Do you want to discuss boring politics? (9 Viewers)

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Tricky one for Malc this!

Not tricky. looks like a good start, keep the pace up and embarrass other parties. reset the performance bar.Just a shame that they want set a target so that we could measure how they are doing compared to an ambition. Seem to have no problem setting targets for the NHS.
 

  • Like
Reactions: PVA

PVA

Well-Known Member
Go tell people whose houses have been devastated by floods and sewage and who have lost everything of sentimental value that it is only a little bit of water.

Well, in comparison to the natural disasters of other countries it is a little bit of water.

Tragic as it is for those people, and it must be absolutely horrendous, it's really not comparable to the things that happen in those countries in that hilarious Facebook meme is it?
 

robbiekeane

Well-Known Member

PVA

Well-Known Member
Tricky one for @shmmeee . More money kept in working person's pocket.


I saw this floating around online and wondered how long before it ended up on here 😅
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
That as soon as there is any form of disaster in those countries / continents there are similar appeals to the people of the UK. The only offer of aid I recall was by Idi Amin of Uganda who, iirc, offered bananas to the UK and sent hardworking Ugandan Asians.

In addition they receive billions of pounds in Foreign Aid that could be beneficially spent in this country. On flood defences, dredging waterways etc. Pot holes even.
I’m not sure why you’re conflating private charitable donations (which always flow from the wealthy to the poor) with state foreign aid which - aside from often being a morally decent thing - is often conditional and serves as a soft power lever for the British government to pull.

Despite your spirited attempts at late night internet research (a Syrian space program? Really?) this is just a copy-paste Facebook meme aimed at generating resentment from British people towards poor (and mostly non-white) foreign people. I would suggest if these people are so objectionable to you, then cutting our foreign aid to them might actually end up with more of them wanting to settle in our suddenly well-funded country.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Tricky one for @shmmeee . More money kept in working person's pocket.


We’ve done this argument. Just search the thread at this point.

Though you seem to think these petitions mean something. So I assume you want us to rejoin the EU as that’s the one that’s had the most signatures.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
I’m not sure why you’re conflating private charitable donations (which always flow from the wealthy to the poor) with state foreign aid which - aside from often being a morally decent thing - is often conditional and serves as a soft power lever for the British government to pull.
Despite your spirited attempts at late night internet research (a Syrian space program? Really?) this is just a copy-paste Facebook meme aimed at generating resentment from British people towards poor (and mostly non-white) foreign people. I would suggest if these people are so objectionable to you, then cutting our foreign aid to them might actually end up with more of them wanting to settle in our suddenly well-funded country.
You can’t even be bothered to do some day time internet research even when pointed in a direction which might help you. Having received it it might have been expected that they could have coped with problems using some of those funds without the need to immediately seek private charitable donations. That of course would be assuming that the money hasn't been squandered on expensive programs or embezzled.

To repeat your comment - a Syrian space program, really. Yes, see below.


My point about foreign aid is that some countries receiving it really don’t need it if they are capable of funding space and / or nuclear weapons programs. A bit like Elton John and the WFA.

On the other hand, we aren’t spending enough on flood defences or prevention. Or children’s breakfasts at school.

So the money could be better spent at home.

Soft levers! Don’t soft levers bend rendering them pretty ineffective?

When was the last time foreign aid earned the UK any respect or favours?

Your turn to prove your point.
 
Last edited:

SBT

Well-Known Member
You can’t even be bothered to do some day time internet research even when pointed in a direction which might help you.


My point about foreign aid is that some countries receiving it really don’t need it if they are capable of funding space and / or nuclear weapons programs. A bit like Elton John and the WFA.

On the other hand, we aren’t spending enough on flood defences or prevention. Or children’s breakfasts at school.

So the money could be better spent at home.
Yes thank you Malcolm, I saw the link the first time. If you truly believe that Syria still has a functioning space program then I won't stand in your way, but it still doesn't explain why you lumped them in with Afghanistan and every country in Africa.

The idea that Britain is struggling to pay for flood defences because of its foreign aid budget doesn't really (ahem) hold water I'm afraid. But you go and have a good laugh at Afghanistan in the meantime.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
When was the last time foreign aid earned the UK any respect or favours?

In India most “aid” is loans and equity investments in the private sector that deliver a return:


In Syria it’s mostly getting kids back into school and is humanitarian aid after the war. It’s in our interest to not let ISIS or other groups use the humanitarian crisis as a way to gain more power.

 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Yes thank you Malcolm, I saw the link the first time. If you truly believe that Syria still has a functioning space program then I won't stand in your way, but it still doesn't explain why you lumped them in with Afghanistan and every country in Africa.

The idea that Britain is struggling to pay for flood defences because of its foreign aid budget doesn't really (ahem) hold water I'm afraid. But you go and have a good laugh at Afghanistan in the meantime.

We either have a £22billion black hole or we don't
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Yes thank you Malcolm, I saw the link the first time. If you truly believe that Syria still has a functioning space program then I won't stand in your way, but it still doesn't explain why you lumped them in with Afghanistan and every country in Africa.

The idea that Britain is struggling to pay for flood defences because of its foreign aid budget doesn't really (ahem) hold water I'm afraid. But you go and have a good laugh at Afghanistan in the meantime.
FFS I didn’t lump them in.

Very good joke by the way. However, every little would help.

Im not laughing at Afghanistan or any of the countries mentioned.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
That as soon as there is any form of disaster in those countries / continents there are similar appeals to the people of the UK. The only offer of aid I recall was by Idi Amin of Uganda who, iirc, offered bananas to the UK and sent hardworking Ugandan Asians.

In addition they receive billions of pounds in Foreign Aid that could be beneficially spent in this country. On flood defences, dredging waterways etc. Pot holes even.

"Sent hardworking Ugandan Asians" lol - Britain offered ugandan asians a refuge from a tyrant. Come on Malc you are much better than this.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Yes thank you Malcolm, I saw the link the first time. If you truly believe that Syria still has a functioning space program then I won't stand in your way, but it still doesn't explain why you lumped them in with Afghanistan and every country in Africa.

The idea that Britain is struggling to pay for flood defences because of its foreign aid budget doesn't really (ahem) hold water I'm afraid. But you go and have a good laugh at Afghanistan in the meantime.
Yep I’m really annoyed at this argument and I’m just as angry at the labour government for not getting on the front foot and explaining how government spending works

There are amounts that have to be paid and then there are discretionary amounts that are choices

Rather than going round in circles nail them and manage the discussion
Get on the front foot over foreign aid and why it’s more important than blah
Manage the discussion around deportation and how much it costs or home office costs for managing claims against border guards
Show the working out
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
In India most “aid” is loans and equity investments in the private sector that deliver a return:


In Syria it’s mostly getting kids back into school and is humanitarian aid after the war. It’s in our interest to not let ISIS or other groups use the humanitarian crisis as a way to gain more power.

Like this
Get on the pr wing and help them out ffs
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Yep I’m really annoyed at this argument and I’m just as angry at the labour government for not getting on the front foot and explaining how government spending works

There are amounts that have to be paid and then there are discretionary amounts that are choices

Rather than going round in circles nail them and manage the discussion
Get on the front foot over foreign aid and why it’s more important than blah
Manage the discussion around deportation and how much it costs or home office costs for managing claims against border guards
Show the working out

You don’t combat what’s essentially xenophobia with stats unfortunately.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
You don’t combat what’s essentially xenophobia with stats unfortunately.
Maybe
I’d hope you’d push the argument from why are we supporting Syrians instead to brits to one that is
Oh I hadn’t realised we were deporting more people than ever and increasing investment in the home office to reduce the time spent waiting for a decision and this has reduced the spending on accommodation from millions to that many millions
Who are you using to stop the boats Nigel and Rupert?
how are you paying for that?
why didn’t you invest blah blah blah

Also lots more families having to leave our church cause of visa issues
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
FFS I didn’t lump them in.

Very good joke by the way. However, every little would help.

Im not laughing at Afghanistan or any of the countries mentioned.
Of course you weren't. "Is this plea each or between them" was a comment borne out of genuine concern, I'm sure.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
This BTW is what’s always worried me about the lefts position of “pretend people can change sex to be nice”.

Douglas Carswell:

0cbe81d8-c502-4bb5-b01a-93219079d6a8.jpg

We’re getting all the hits of the 1930s right now.

(and gender is fluid dipshit it’s a social construct, you mean sex)

The underlying ideology of the elites has always been a way to reconcile the fact that they’ve got far too much and how is that fair? Perhaps the most eye opening thing I’ve seen is this YouTube documentary from one of the Johnson & Johnson heirs:



The ultra wealthy struggle with the morality of their wealth and the only way out of it is to claim they’re genetically superior to those who aren’t wealthy. All the racism, homophobia, sexism, etc comes from a need to justify their unearned position.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
I hate the politics in a statement ostensibly from the DHSC, Tories shouldn't do it and neither should Labour. It's pathetic. The statement makes the DHSC look stupid as it was they that published the original NHP and now they're rubbish their own plan.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
It was all stuff originally planned to be complete by 2030 (which yes realistically wasn't going to happen). Now lots of it has been pushed back 10 years, which means years more of substandard healthcare settings and high maintenance costs and reduced economic boost from investment.

It’s still on the left to do better though. And for five years now it’s shown no appetite to. I couldn’t even name a left wing person that’s come to prominence since maybe 2015?

Still a lack of charismatic leaders, still a lack of being able or prioritise to get elected, still an unwillingness to meet voters where they are. 2017 looked like the start of that then the borrowed votes from the anti Brexit vote convinced them they just needed to go further to the left to win and they blew it.

My kingdom for a serious left wing policy platform headed by a charismatic leader backed by a serious electoral strategy.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
It’s still on the left to do better though. And for five years now it’s shown no appetite to. I couldn’t even name a left wing person that’s come to prominence since maybe 2015?

Still a lack of charismatic leaders, still a lack of being able or prioritise to get elected, still an unwillingness to meet voters where they are. 2017 looked like the start of that then the borrowed votes from the anti Brexit vote convinced them they just needed to go further to the left to win and they blew it.

My kingdom for a serious left wing policy platform headed by a charismatic leader backed by a serious electoral strategy.
I don't disagree with that but it doesn't mean I can't criticise the actions of the government. It's not even from a perspective of "what they're proposing isn't left wing enough" it's from the perspective of "it doesn't line up with their purported aims and is economically illogical"
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I don't disagree with that but it doesn't mean I can't criticise the actions of the government. It's not even from a perspective of "what they're proposing isn't left wing enough" it's from the perspective of "it doesn't line up with their purported aims and is economically illogical"

I don’t know the details so will defer to you on your specialist subject, it just read to me as “we should borrow to invest more now”
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top