Match Thread Coventry City - Queens Park Rangers Match Thread - Tuesday 11th Feb (96 Viewers)

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
A couple of decent turns in the middle
Of his own half isn’t going to cut it. Needs to be influencing the game in the right areas


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He hasn’t been given the ball in those positions.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
We seem to have got the upper hand, but uninspiring game.

Still not sure we should have changed the two up top system, esp at home in a very winnable game.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Feels like we are in desperate need of another midfielder in that gap between simms and grimes , maybe a switch to 433 at some point in the second half .

It's solid but feels like we are heading towards a point this way
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
We're playing for a tight win as that's what we need to do here. Hopefully EMC can light us up a bit.
Should be 1-0 up, Simms shouldn't be giving the keeper a chance.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
It's not been great but let's not lie and pretend it's been pants either

Would like to see us move saka and rudoni more forward or even go 433 second half of emc can do a 20 mins cameo
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Watford and Norwich doing their bit. Just need a goal off someone’s arse.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Decent half overall. Tempo needs to be quicker, particularly on both wings. Dasilva and Milan are slowing it down at times. Opportunities to get at the full back or get a ball in the box and they are stopping and playing backwards.
 

Frostie

Well-Known Member
Just a bit dull & predictable.
Personally would have gone 3-5-2 rather than 3-4-3. As expected Simms isolated & it doesn't get the best from Rudoni or Sakamoto either. We're nullifying our own creativity.
 

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
I'm no fan of BTA but Simms is really missing a partner up top.

The two of them at least had something going between them in our run of four wins.

Said it plenty of times, playing a lone striker doesnt work.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top