Leicester (8 Viewers)

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
What a season this could be for them...

They're one of the worst teams in PL history, we go up via the Playoffs & Forest get into the Champions League. Beautiful.
Incredibly they still have double Southampton's points total. What a waste of a top flight spot that was.
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
It’s pretty toxic at Southampton who presumably expected even less!
Just like Leicester they expected much more.

After our last 25 years our expectations would be lower. Hopefully we could get over the constant defeats and enjoy the moment because it can get toxic very quickly with constant defeats.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
We’d be calling for Lampards head come October.
 

Robinshio

Well-Known Member
Nearly 11 hours without a home goal or point. I remember our forum early January with people speculating on the season ticket drop off for next season. 2 months later we are getting record gates. We are as fickle as the rest. Only the 7k who followed to league 2 are guaranteed
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Took some. Many still backed him.

But playing at Prem level should mean everyone being more realistic.

I wonder if a mid season takeover and new manager wouldn’t be on the cards anyway. I strongly suspect Doug doesn’t want to keep us longer than necessary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AOM

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Ah you meant the club. We were also in very bad form for a similar stretch in 23/24, the club stuck with him.
I backed him then and when he was dismissed. My low moment came in L1. We lost away at Shrewsbury and I couldn't see how he was going to turn it around. He did and I'm grateful. It was because of that, why I was always prepared to believe we could turn it again and if you look at all the successful teams, in recent times, they have longevity and the manager is usually in for a number of window. I'd give Lampard the same support even if we lost every game in the Prem, knowing we'd be stronger the season after and with parachute payments too.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I backed him then and when he was dismissed. My low moment came in L1. We lost away at Shrewsbury and I couldn't see how he was going to turn it around. He did and I'm grateful. It was because of that, why I was always prepared to believe we could turn it again and if you look at all the successful teams, in recent times, they have longevity and the manager is usually in for a number of window. I'd give Lampard the same support even if we lost every game in the Prem, knowing we'd be stronger the season after and with parachute payments too.
That run of form in 23/24 would have cost most Championship managers their job, not because it’s right, just because that’s the nature of the league. King gave him more time and was justified in the end.

This season I thought he deserved more time, King this time did not and by any measure, his decision was justified. It was perhaps even what MR himself needed.
 

Travs

Well-Known Member
This illusion that we're a totally different fanbase from Leicester (or indeed anyone else) is complete bollocks.

Historically pretty similar to Leicester..... similar crowds, similar cities, similar history. If we got promoted and have a crap season, the knives will be out for Lampard and King before long.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
This illusion that we're a totally different fanbase from Leicester (or indeed anyone else) is complete bollocks.

Historically pretty similar to Leicester..... similar crowds, similar cities, similar history. If we got promoted and have a crap season, the knives will be out for Lampard and King before long.
Are the knives out for McKenna at Ipswich?
 

Senior Vick from Alicante

Well-Known Member
That run of form in 23/24 would have cost most Championship managers their job, not because it’s right, just because that’s the nature of the league. King gave him more time and was justified in the end.

This season I thought he deserved more time, King this time did not and by any measure, his decision was justified. It was perhaps even what MR himself needed.
I think King had saw the signs the year before and had to act, it was mostly the same squad and they were drifting. King made the right decision for both Robins and the club. Unpopular decision but maybe Robins had reached his ceiling, although not proven yet if Stoke survive it will be interesting to watch them next season to see if he turns them around.
 

The Great Eastern

Well-Known Member
Are the knives out for McKenna at Ipswich?
I can only quote the one Ipswich fan I regularly speak to and he is appalled at McKennas tactics. They are seemingly bound to get relegated if they carry on playing the way they currently are. Tried to explain to him that becoming a yo-yo team isnt the end of the world. I strongly suspect he had visions of Ipswich repeating the brilliant season under George Burley where they qualified for the UEFA cup 1st season after promotion. Was never, ever going to happen this time round despite their spending on new players.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I can only quote the one Ipswich fan I regularly speak to and he is appalled at McKennas tactics. They are seemingly bound to get relegated if they carry on playing the way they currently are. Tried to explain to him that becoming a yo-yo team isnt the end of the world. I strongly suspect he had visions of Ipswich repeating the brilliant season under George Burley where they qualified for the UEFA cup 1st season after promotion. Was never, ever going to happen this time round despite their spending on new players.
Going from League 1 to the Prem in straight seasons is an incredibly tough ask in itself, never mind staying there. They haven't disgraced themselves and I imagine most of their fans are still behind him.
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
I wonder if a mid season takeover and new manager wouldn’t be on the cards anyway. I strongly suspect Doug doesn’t want to keep us longer than necessary.
Could well be. The only plans we know of from King is to get promoted. But new owner getting rid of Lampard 🤔
 

MusicDating

Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
What does this mean exactly Gynn?


List of outstanding charges on companies house. As I understand it, Macquarie loan Leics money up front that they would have received in later installments of a transfer. At a hefty interest rate I suspect.


This is one of the outstanding charges, which I assume relates to Timothy Castagne who moved to Fulham on August 29, 2023 for £13m. So Leics will get f all on 31st Aug 2025 as that'll go straight to Macquarie to satisfy the charge. Legally of course this is all fine, but I do wonder if they do this as another way of bypassing the PSR rules. It's also kicking the debt's can down the road ofc...

1742564933077.png
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member

List of outstanding charges on companies house. As I understand it, Macquarie loan Leics money up front that they would have received in later installments of a transfer. At a hefty interest rate I suspect.


This is one of the outstanding charges, which I assume relates to Timothy Castagne who moved to Fulham on August 29, 2023 for £13m. So Leics will get f all on 31st Aug 2025 as that'll go straight to Macquarie to satisfy the charge. Legally of course this is all fine, but I do wonder if they do this as another way of bypassing the PSR rules. It's also kicking the debt's can down the road ofc...

View attachment 42165
It wouldn't surprise me if they found yet another way of misinterpreting the rules. But the rules should be good enough for this not to help their cheating the system. Loaning the money from a company or owner should be covered in the same way. It should be spent at the same moment. Transfer fees and wages are paid out whatever.

Could be that they have taken a massive gamble on staying up and it has fantastically backfired 😂
 

Macca1987

Well-Known Member
It wouldn't surprise me if they found yet another way of misinterpreting the rules. But the rules should be good enough for this not to help their cheating the system. Loaning the money from a company or owner should be covered in the same way. It should be spent at the same moment. Transfer fees and wages are paid out whatever.

Could be that they have taken a massive gamble on staying up and it has fantastically backfired 😂
I hope so, never have I wanted a team to be punished as much
Their bending and playing the rules over time has really pissed me off
Time for a reckoning from the EFL
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
I hope so, never have I wanted a team to be punished as much
Their bending and playing the rules over time has really pissed me off
Time for a reckoning from the EFL
They have pissed off both the EFL and the PLFA. Can't see anything but the pair of them getting together to make sure something sticks.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
It wouldn't surprise me if they found yet another way of misinterpreting the rules. But the rules should be good enough for this not to help their cheating the system. Loaning the money from a company or owner should be covered in the same way. It should be spent at the same moment. Transfer fees and wages are paid out whatever.

Could be that they have taken a massive gamble on staying up and it has fantastically backfired 😂
Is this a kind of repeat of Leeds under Ridsdale and O:Leary?
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
Is this a kind of repeat of Leeds under Ridsdale and O:Leary?
I would say very similar. Leeds need to go up this season, sell or get some serious money from somewhere. But as far as I know they have kept within the rules so far.
 

Covkid1968#

Well-Known Member
Living Leics way I have through necessity befriended a number of their fans. and to my great surprise some of them are pretty decent lads...there is though one complete bellend who I would love the whole thing to unravel for. This would give me great pleasure....its already proving to be amusing listening to him and his Mrs, who are both season ticket holders, bemoaning just how unfair it all is. I nearly spat my pint out laughing when he said he was getting behind a Vardy to be manager campaign. Listening to that just fills my heart with joy...

At my previous local in South leics there was an even bigger bellend...he was the numpty who ran on the pitch and gobbed off to the Tottenham goalkeeper many years ago. I plan to get back down to South Leics to go and have a pint in my old local just to take the enjoyment to the next level.
 

MusicDating

Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
I hope so, never have I wanted a team to be punished as much
Their bending and playing the rules over time has really pissed me off
Time for a reckoning from the EFL

So reading a bit more into this, I don't think it's interest bearing, more that Macquarie have loaned Leics less than the money they'll receive from other clubs installments/EPL monies. eg so they sold Maddison for £40m, Macquarie gives them £35m up front and then waits to receive the £40m over time in the planned installments.

Seems like it gets around a loan from the owners which would fall under PSR.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member

List of outstanding charges on companies house. As I understand it, Macquarie loan Leics money up front that they would have received in later installments of a transfer. At a hefty interest rate I suspect.


This is one of the outstanding charges, which I assume relates to Timothy Castagne who moved to Fulham on August 29, 2023 for £13m. So Leics will get f all on 31st Aug 2025 as that'll go straight to Macquarie to satisfy the charge. Legally of course this is all fine, but I do wonder if they do this as another way of bypassing the PSR rules. It's also kicking the debt's can down the road ofc...

View attachment 42165

The most recent charge is from January 2025, it's obviously not referred to in the accounts. Interesting that they're still borrowing money against future income, it surely can't end well for them. KP is struggling for cashflow apparently, which is probably why they're having to lend money from third parties. I'd imagine their fancy training ground and academy is mortgaged up now.
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
So reading a bit more into this, I don't think it's interest bearing, more that Macquarie have loaned Leics less than the money they'll receive from other clubs installments/EPL monies. eg so they sold Maddison for £40m, Macquarie gives them £35m up front and then waits to receive the £40m over time in the planned installments.

Seems like it gets around a loan from the owners which would fall under PSR.
Unless they have worked out another way to beat the rules that are set in black and white it shouts of desperation for cash.

Clubs are only allowed to spend money that corresponds with their income. Getting transfer fees early doesn't give them a higher turnover. All it does is gives a boost to the bank balance in the short term.

Remember when we turned down an offer for Hyam but then accepted a lower bid for him that was cash on the nail under SISU?

It's reasons like this that I think they're in a financial mess after gambling all to stay in the Prem to get away from the sanctions due.....unless they have a new plan on how to beat them.

Whatever happens next is going to be interesting. I just hope the cheating barstoods get what they deserve.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top