Leicester (31 Viewers)

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
What a season this could be for them...

They're one of the worst teams in PL history, we go up via the Playoffs & Forest get into the Champions League. Beautiful.
Incredibly they still have double Southampton's points total. What a waste of a top flight spot that was.
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
It’s pretty toxic at Southampton who presumably expected even less!
Just like Leicester they expected much more.

After our last 25 years our expectations would be lower. Hopefully we could get over the constant defeats and enjoy the moment because it can get toxic very quickly with constant defeats.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
We’d be calling for Lampards head come October.
 

Robinshio

Well-Known Member
Nearly 11 hours without a home goal or point. I remember our forum early January with people speculating on the season ticket drop off for next season. 2 months later we are getting record gates. We are as fickle as the rest. Only the 7k who followed to league 2 are guaranteed
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Took some. Many still backed him.

But playing at Prem level should mean everyone being more realistic.

I wonder if a mid season takeover and new manager wouldn’t be on the cards anyway. I strongly suspect Doug doesn’t want to keep us longer than necessary.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Ah you meant the club. We were also in very bad form for a similar stretch in 23/24, the club stuck with him.
I backed him then and when he was dismissed. My low moment came in L1. We lost away at Shrewsbury and I couldn't see how he was going to turn it around. He did and I'm grateful. It was because of that, why I was always prepared to believe we could turn it again and if you look at all the successful teams, in recent times, they have longevity and the manager is usually in for a number of window. I'd give Lampard the same support even if we lost every game in the Prem, knowing we'd be stronger the season after and with parachute payments too.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I backed him then and when he was dismissed. My low moment came in L1. We lost away at Shrewsbury and I couldn't see how he was going to turn it around. He did and I'm grateful. It was because of that, why I was always prepared to believe we could turn it again and if you look at all the successful teams, in recent times, they have longevity and the manager is usually in for a number of window. I'd give Lampard the same support even if we lost every game in the Prem, knowing we'd be stronger the season after and with parachute payments too.
That run of form in 23/24 would have cost most Championship managers their job, not because it’s right, just because that’s the nature of the league. King gave him more time and was justified in the end.

This season I thought he deserved more time, King this time did not and by any measure, his decision was justified. It was perhaps even what MR himself needed.
 

Travs

Well-Known Member
This illusion that we're a totally different fanbase from Leicester (or indeed anyone else) is complete bollocks.

Historically pretty similar to Leicester..... similar crowds, similar cities, similar history. If we got promoted and have a crap season, the knives will be out for Lampard and King before long.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
This illusion that we're a totally different fanbase from Leicester (or indeed anyone else) is complete bollocks.

Historically pretty similar to Leicester..... similar crowds, similar cities, similar history. If we got promoted and have a crap season, the knives will be out for Lampard and King before long.
Are the knives out for McKenna at Ipswich?
 

Senior Vick from Alicante

Well-Known Member
That run of form in 23/24 would have cost most Championship managers their job, not because it’s right, just because that’s the nature of the league. King gave him more time and was justified in the end.

This season I thought he deserved more time, King this time did not and by any measure, his decision was justified. It was perhaps even what MR himself needed.
I think King had saw the signs the year before and had to act, it was mostly the same squad and they were drifting. King made the right decision for both Robins and the club. Unpopular decision but maybe Robins had reached his ceiling, although not proven yet if Stoke survive it will be interesting to watch them next season to see if he turns them around.
 

The Great Eastern

Well-Known Member
Are the knives out for McKenna at Ipswich?
I can only quote the one Ipswich fan I regularly speak to and he is appalled at McKennas tactics. They are seemingly bound to get relegated if they carry on playing the way they currently are. Tried to explain to him that becoming a yo-yo team isnt the end of the world. I strongly suspect he had visions of Ipswich repeating the brilliant season under George Burley where they qualified for the UEFA cup 1st season after promotion. Was never, ever going to happen this time round despite their spending on new players.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I can only quote the one Ipswich fan I regularly speak to and he is appalled at McKennas tactics. They are seemingly bound to get relegated if they carry on playing the way they currently are. Tried to explain to him that becoming a yo-yo team isnt the end of the world. I strongly suspect he had visions of Ipswich repeating the brilliant season under George Burley where they qualified for the UEFA cup 1st season after promotion. Was never, ever going to happen this time round despite their spending on new players.
Going from League 1 to the Prem in straight seasons is an incredibly tough ask in itself, never mind staying there. They haven't disgraced themselves and I imagine most of their fans are still behind him.
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
I wonder if a mid season takeover and new manager wouldn’t be on the cards anyway. I strongly suspect Doug doesn’t want to keep us longer than necessary.
Could well be. The only plans we know of from King is to get promoted. But new owner getting rid of Lampard 🤔
 

MusicDating

Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
What does this mean exactly Gynn?


List of outstanding charges on companies house. As I understand it, Macquarie loan Leics money up front that they would have received in later installments of a transfer. At a hefty interest rate I suspect.


This is one of the outstanding charges, which I assume relates to Timothy Castagne who moved to Fulham on August 29, 2023 for £13m. So Leics will get f all on 31st Aug 2025 as that'll go straight to Macquarie to satisfy the charge. Legally of course this is all fine, but I do wonder if they do this as another way of bypassing the PSR rules. It's also kicking the debt's can down the road ofc...

1742564933077.png
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member

List of outstanding charges on companies house. As I understand it, Macquarie loan Leics money up front that they would have received in later installments of a transfer. At a hefty interest rate I suspect.


This is one of the outstanding charges, which I assume relates to Timothy Castagne who moved to Fulham on August 29, 2023 for £13m. So Leics will get f all on 31st Aug 2025 as that'll go straight to Macquarie to satisfy the charge. Legally of course this is all fine, but I do wonder if they do this as another way of bypassing the PSR rules. It's also kicking the debt's can down the road ofc...

View attachment 42165
It wouldn't surprise me if they found yet another way of misinterpreting the rules. But the rules should be good enough for this not to help their cheating the system. Loaning the money from a company or owner should be covered in the same way. It should be spent at the same moment. Transfer fees and wages are paid out whatever.

Could be that they have taken a massive gamble on staying up and it has fantastically backfired 😂
 

Macca1987

Well-Known Member
It wouldn't surprise me if they found yet another way of misinterpreting the rules. But the rules should be good enough for this not to help their cheating the system. Loaning the money from a company or owner should be covered in the same way. It should be spent at the same moment. Transfer fees and wages are paid out whatever.

Could be that they have taken a massive gamble on staying up and it has fantastically backfired 😂
I hope so, never have I wanted a team to be punished as much
Their bending and playing the rules over time has really pissed me off
Time for a reckoning from the EFL
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
I hope so, never have I wanted a team to be punished as much
Their bending and playing the rules over time has really pissed me off
Time for a reckoning from the EFL
They have pissed off both the EFL and the PLFA. Can't see anything but the pair of them getting together to make sure something sticks.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
It wouldn't surprise me if they found yet another way of misinterpreting the rules. But the rules should be good enough for this not to help their cheating the system. Loaning the money from a company or owner should be covered in the same way. It should be spent at the same moment. Transfer fees and wages are paid out whatever.

Could be that they have taken a massive gamble on staying up and it has fantastically backfired 😂
Is this a kind of repeat of Leeds under Ridsdale and O:Leary?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top