Can anybody play the drums? (9 Viewers)

[MalcSB]

Who?

Just seen Zak has kissed and made up with Pete and Roger and is now re-employed by the Who.

 

---

[fernandopartridge]

Rape can be difficult to prove in many cases too. Horrible c**t.

Should imagine that it is statutory rape, which is having sex with a girl under the age of consent and unable to consent, rather than having sex with a woman who does not give consent.

 

[oscillatewildly]

Just seen he has kissed and made up with Pete and Roger and is now re-employed by the Who.

The circumstances surrounding his sacking were a little odd to say the least.

 

[SkyBluePower]

Just seen he has kissed and made up with Pete and Roger and is now re-employed by the Who.

Did Townsend ever finish that book he was researching

 

[Samueljames1991]

Been remanded in custody

 

[rob9872]

Been remanded in custody

Yep 22nd May at Warwick Crown Court. Hopefully he'll be going down two days before we go up.

 

[no_loyalty]

Yep 22nd May at Warwick Crown Court. Hopefully he'll be going down two days before we go up.

I can feel a song coming on .

 

[David O'Day]

"Might be". I dont reckon they'll be arsed on here

You'll be surprised, legally you can talk about on going legal cases if you report the facts as per the case

You may not think it's much but this is a large Coventry City forum and it's the case against a semi famous Coventry fan. Defence lawyers have collapsed cases on less before.

Also due to the nature of the cases and the age of the victims they'll likely soon impose reporting restrictions.

 

[chiefdave]

You'll be surprised, legally you can talk about on going legal cases if you report the facts as per the case

You may not think it's much but this is a large Coventry City forum and it's the case against a semi famous Coventry fan. Defence lawyers have collapsed cases on less before.

Also due to the nature of the cases and the age of the victims they'll likely soon impose reporting restrictions.

I had no clue who the bloke was before now but I've had accounts who are posting screenshots of messages show up on my twitter feed. Is it wise to be putting that sort of thing into the public domain when there's an upcoming trial?

 

[David O'Day]

I had no clue who the bloke was before now but I've had accounts who are posting screenshots of messages show up on my twitter feed. Is it wise to be putting that sort of thing into the public domain when there's an upcoming trial?

This is it, most people like be fine but all it takes is one to even innocently post the wrong thing.

Most forums I have been part of don't allow talk of upcoming and ongoing trials for that reason.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

This is it, most people like be fine but all it takes is one to even innocently post the wrong thing.

Most forums I have been part of don't allow talk of upcoming and ongoing trials for that reason.

What forums you on?

 

[David O'Day]

What forums you on?

ones where all the cool kids hang out

 

[Briles]

I'm almost certain that calling someone a nonce for being charged with rape of a child wont be frowned upon. Mind you it is 2025

 

[MalcSB]

Agree. He's a dirty little nonce sho will be rightly locked up.

That sounds a lot like giving an opinion on innocence or guilt in advance of a trial.

 

[rob9872]

That sounds a lot like giving an opinion on innocence or guilt in advance of a trial.

Nope that sounds a lot like someone who saw the screenshots posted everywhere of someone texting a child.

We also don't know there will be a trial. He's most likely pleaded guilty since it's pretty indefensible and the court date is for sentencing since the magistrates didn't have the power to do so for crimes of such gravity.

 

[Flying Fokker]

Nope that sounds a lot like someone who saw the screenshots posted everywhere of someone texting a child.

We also don't know there will be a trial. He's most likely pleaded guilty since it's pretty indefensible and the court date is for sentencing since the magistrates didn't have the power to do so for crimes of such gravity.

Doubt it.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

Nope that sounds a lot like someone who saw the screenshots posted everywhere of someone texting a child.

We also don't know there will be a trial. He's most likely pleaded guilty since it's pretty indefensible and the court date is for sentencing since the magistrates didn't have the power to do so for crimes of such gravity.

Sounds like it to me but he may plead not guilty. I doubt he can pay for legal advice

 

[MalcSB]

Nope that sounds a lot like someone who saw the screenshots posted everywhere of someone texting a child.

We also don't know there will be a trial. He's most likely pleaded guilty since it's pretty indefensible and the court date is for sentencing since the magistrates didn't have the power to do so for crimes of such gravity.

Key word there is the second “someone”.

 

[SBT]

I'm almost certain that calling someone a nonce for being charged with rape of a child wont be frowned upon. Mind you it is 2025

You kind of have to wait until they’re found guilty

 

[rob9872]

Key word there is the second “someone”.

And the real key if we're being pedantic, is that my reply was in response to a quote about the texts and therefore I am referring to that 'someone' and haven't implied any names

 

[MalcSB]

You kind of have to wait until they’re found guilty

And even then a guilty verdict may not be definitive.

 

[alexccfc99]

Was that guy where King clapped back at him pretty hard?

Pretty sure he was the one who asked him about the performance director and what she does, it definitely irked the owner a bit

 

[Nick]

Imagine being a person that wants to be mates with somebody because they bang a drum, the woman on CWR couldn't get enough of him. Was quite obvious he was very strange after he wanted people to not walk to Wembley because he wasn't.

Didn't quite expect to that extent.

 

[Grendel]

Shouldnt discuss ongoing trials as they might prejudice the outcome.

Hardly applies in reality does it

 

[Grendel]

You'll be surprised, legally you can talk about on going legal cases if you report the facts as per the case

You may not think it's much but this is a large Coventry City forum and it's the case against a semi famous Coventry fan. Defence lawyers have collapsed cases on less before.

Also due to the nature of the cases and the age of the victims they'll likely soon impose reporting restrictions.

LOL

 

[Grendel]

View attachment 42662

Was on one of the Facebook groups

Is that actually him? He's not 24 surely?

 

[Grendel]

Imagine being a person that wants to be mates with somebody because they bang a drum, the woman on CWR couldn't get enough of him. Was quite obvious he was very strange after he wanted people to not walk to Wembley because he wasn't.

Didn't quite expect to that extent.

Yes Lorna Bailey - bit embarrasing

Sky Blues fans buy season ticket for Arena drummer

More than £840 has been raised by Coventry City fans to show appreciation for Lynden Holtom-Stott.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[Liquid Gold]

Is that actually him? He's not 24 surely?

 

[Chicken Mcgraw]

Yes Lorna Bailey - bit embarrasing

Sky Blues fans buy season ticket for Arena drummer

More than £840 has been raised by Coventry City fans to show appreciation for Lynden Holtom-Stott.

www.bbc.co.uk

Anyone that begs for freebies like this is clearly a weirdo. Seen a couple of City fans do this now

 

[Grendel]

I think we can discuss it as it seems rather common knowledge

Lynden Holtom-Stott - Sexual Abuser from Bedworth | Abuser Profile | Red Rose Database

Lynden Holtom-Stott is a Sexual Abuser, Rapist, Child Sexual Assault in Bedworth. A 24-year-old man from Bedworth, Lynden Holtom-Stott, has been charged with multiple sexual offences involving a child, sending shockwaves through the local community.<br><br> The charges, which include serious...

madebyredrose.co.uk

 

[Grendel]

View attachment 42744

I was being sarcastic - the actual guy looks about 12

 

[fernandopartridge]

The police have announced publicly his name and what he's been charged with including a photo of him. It'd be a bit of a stretch to say people talking about it would prejudice the trial, otherwise why would the police release that information?

 

[Nick]

The police have announced publicly his name and what he's been charged with including a photo of him. It'd be a bit of a stretch to say people talking about it would prejudice the trial, otherwise why would the police release that information?

Exactly.

 

[Sky_Blue_Dreamer]

I was being sarcastic - the actual guy looks about 12

 

[rob9872]

The police have announced publicly his name and what he's been charged with including a photo of him. It'd be a bit of a stretch to say people talking about it would prejudice the trial, otherwise why would the police release that information?

And this tbh is where I have an issue. Forget this case, more of a general point. Mud sticks (weirdly I remember Colin Stagg, Christopher Jefferies, yet not quite so easily the actual perpetrators). No details should be shared until conviction by the police, media etc in the same way there is rightly anonymity for the victim.