Can anybody play the drums? (8 Viewers)

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
It’s classed as rape for 13 years and under😲 14 to 15 may get classed different. Wtf has he been doing 😐

Think it’s 13 and under can’t consent ever. 14/15 there can be circumstances. The length of time and stuff this looks like grooming and the family have found out and pressed charges to take a while guess.
 

Samueljames1991

Well-Known Member
Think it’s 13 and under can’t consent ever. 14/15 there can be circumstances. The length of time and stuff this looks like grooming and the family have found out and pressed charges to take a while guess.
I think the circumstances are if a 15 year old is seeing a 17 year old or 14 year old and 16 year old

Illegal but they're all still kids and theres less than a two year age gap.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
I think the circumstances are if a 15 year old is seeing a 17 year old or 14 year old and 16 year old

Illegal but they're all still kids and theres less than a two year age gap.
Tbh I wouldn't even have a problem if he was 18 and she was 15, knowing how immature lads are, albeit the law says differently, but this fekker is 24 and got a kid. No excuses.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I think the circumstances are if a 15 year old is seeing a 17 year old or 14 year old and 16 year old

Illegal but they're all still kids and theres less than a two year age gap.

Don’t think the two years is in law. I was looking into this for another internet argument a while ago. There’s the laws and there’s the guidance as well. Generally it’s set up pretty well to recognise the complexity in relationships.

Just saying this girl could be 15 and have “consented” but it’s still rape because of the circumstances of how it happened, her maturity, etc. We don’t know 100% she’s under 13.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Not sure but just after King did his big speech about the reasons for sacking MR, he asked “why no loan players?” like a Neanderthal.

I thought that person and the guy who said ‘and this is another mistake [sacking Robins]’ guy were dicks.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Not sure but just after King did his big speech about the reasons for sacking MR, he asked “why no loan players?” like a Neanderthal.
I thought that person and the guy who said ‘and this is another mistake [sacking Robins]’ guy were dicks.

What the fuck has that got to do with him being accused of being nonce for fucks sake?!
 

Briles

Well-Known Member
Shouldnt discuss ongoing trials as they might prejudice the outcome.
I dont think there's a law about discussing ongoing trials unless you are providing new info
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I dont think there's a law about discussing ongoing trials unless you are providing new info

It’s contempt of court. I think the worst here comes under saying if you think he’s guilty here at worst.


IMG_3405.jpeg
 

Briles

Well-Known Member
It’s contempt of court. I think the worst here comes under saying if you think he’s guilty here at worst.


View attachment 42676
"Might be". I dont reckon they'll be arsed on here
 

Chicken Mcgraw

Well-Known Member
Atmosphere suffered today without a drummer, a lot more women and children too I’m guessing because of the location and time of year. We need to be louder at Luton.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top