If it's hard for you to believe then that's your lookout as it's wrong!
The vast majority are capable of working for it - and a lot could help themselves by not spewing out kids. We have one daughter. I would like more children but we made a concious decision not to because we can't really afford to and it would potentially mean moving house for more space a tighter squeeze on the purse strings and possibly my daughter missing out on things. Lots of other would be parents choose a different course and they are entitled to but I still fail to see why I should pay for that decision.
Where is the incentive to work for 40 hours to get eg £200 per week if they can get £150 p/w for doing nothing? Make them earn it and all of a sudden that £50 to try and better themselves seems far more appealing.
80 years ago today a party won an election with almost 50% of the vote, they blamed and exterminated the sub-normals, poor, political opponents, the itinerants, the slavs, the populas still had no work, money, luxuries or food, the wealthy did, castles, mansions, luxuries, opulance, social standing mostly earned by accident of birth. Then moved on to the Jews, have to have scapegoats do the rich. In todays times it's the Eastern European, who's that, the Pole, Kosovan, they have mobile phones you know, the muslim, the asian. But lets not worry William and Kate are nice people. Your views my friend are dangerous
that's your average socialist for you!
