I don't quite get what you mean to be honest. These seem like two completely different things. Ukip aren't saying only certain people can live or anything. They're simple saying we need to gain control of this issue.
They are a party built around establishing an imperialist approach to the UK. A defining of what it is acceptable to be counted as 'British' through their exclusion of those that aren't "native" to British Isles.
It's hard to see how a party like this can not be seen as xenophobic. It is certainly a party that is not comfortable with cultural, racial or social integration based upon their published published comments regarding gay marriage, immigration, the sovereign right of the UK and integration into a common European community (as opposed to an economic community).
It is no coincidence that during times of austerity and economic hardship, the right wing extremists stir up anti-foreign attitudes through various media and with different tactics.
It is understandable that when times are truly difficult for people, fears about job security and standards of living are questioned and pockets of society feel threatened. But thoughts, as we only know to well on this site, do not equate to facts. And fear is something that very easy to tap into and use as a way to not only control people, but as a route to becoming influential to controlling people.
Hitler's National party, as I'm sure many including yourself know, came to rise up through Germany's political system at a time of severe economic hardship. There was low self esteem for the country as well as self worth. The humiliation of the end of the World War and the consequences of this led to anger that was easy to manipulate, harness and direct.
Of course, history tells us now with the benefit of hindsight, where that was directed, and particularly at who.
It's so very easy to see how the Jews could be blamed for relative states of affluence whilst the majority of German nationals continued to suffer.
And for the moment, this is where I believe the parallels that can be drawn can end.
How do I see UKIP relating to this? Very easily. Although, not to the extremes by any stretch. But there is an unhealthy 'blaming' of other cultures and societies for problems that the UK currently sees itself addressing.
Do I think Nigel Farage is an Adolf Hitler? Of course I don't. But from a sociological perspective, it is fascinating to be able to draw some parallels between the two events.
My earlier point, which I failed to make clear, was about how far you think UKIP can go under this 'protest banner' that they currently go by, and how comfortable you would feel with any further progress they would make.
Removing the UKIP economically and socially from the EU, in my opinion, is backward thinking and against where the global society in which the UK finds itself will inevitably end up.
Will shouting at it and fighting it in hopes of a return to the British Empire change things? Not in the slightest. It will do more harm than good to any company considering investing in businesses here.
I don't see where UKIP has to move forward. It is a right wing party, and people are naturally free to follow those politics if they believe in them. But the party speaks on a platform that marginalizes people, encourages an insular attitude from it's subjects, and puts up barriers through a very hard line party leader.
Given the support that the party received recently, it will be very interesting to see which direction the party moves in and how it attempts to attract more voters.
I don't believe for a moment that UKIP is a serious threat to the long term political direction of the country, where most people would probably identify with being moderates and fairly close to the 'centre ground'. But their very existence and thriving support base is a worry for those of us who would describe themselves as being more liberal and progressive.
I hope I explained myself better this time
