stupot07
Well-Known Member
Completely agree CCFC.
Forum.. (4 Viewers)
- Thread starter wal3590
- Start date
Completely agree CCFC.
I think we should expect all to happen through Appleton TBH,fishers nightmare scenario by the sound of it. I think that means he's redundant ,while implying a threat over us.
:jerkit::jerkit::blue::blue:
stupot07
Well-Known Member
I assume you are on about F&B'S (£600k)? To be fair TF took that as 1 example of match day income, there are others e.g selling naming rights for the stadium and stands, etc.
Mary_Mungo_Midge
Well-Known Member
You're right. It is. The FL will allow a delay in the location of those fixtures being published as I understand, but given how complex this looks, there must be a time when they pull the rug on Timmy. He'd have, as I see it in administration, a choice between not fulfilling fixtures, or going cap in hand to ACL.
Is that the unwritten sub-plot to these strange forums? To garner opinion for a rush out if administration?!? As without such, he faces the unthinkable choice above?!?
MalcolmPowder
Member
Im amazed that no one asked Tim Fisher if even though he is not sure what prospective bidders for CCFC Ltd would be bidding for, would CCFC Holdings be submitting a bid to the administrator for Ltd ? And also , were ACL aware that their contract for lease and licence of the RICOH was with a "non trading property subsidory" for all of SISU's tenure?
I genuinely feel that SISU wheeling out Fisher explaining their "long term vision" whiffs of desperation on their part , as if it was and cut and dried as Fisher made it sound tonight, they wouldn't be within a hundred miles of a fans forum in June.They only communicate when in the shit, and usually come out worse than they started.
CCFC Holdings/SISU get golden share- RIP City
Holdings/SISU get Limited- RIP City
AN Other get limited - Maybe a future
I genuinely feel that SISU wheeling out Fisher explaining their "long term vision" whiffs of desperation on their part , as if it was and cut and dried as Fisher made it sound tonight, they wouldn't be within a hundred miles of a fans forum in June.They only communicate when in the shit, and usually come out worse than they started.
CCFC Holdings/SISU get golden share- RIP City
Holdings/SISU get Limited- RIP City
AN Other get limited - Maybe a future
lifelongcityfan
Well-Known Member
Naming rights for a club in the fourth division with no fans....you are having a laugh!! have you been to any away grounds this season and seen the sponsors.... peanuts.
Stadiums like the Ricoh, emirates etc with succesful clubs in the Premiership/Championship are the only ones with significant revenues from naming rights.
How are sisu going to improve the playing side to get us up the league and attract new fans...SISU have no plans to improve the playing staff
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
It is my sincere but fading hope that PH4 or AN Other secures ownership for CCFC Ltd in ACL with Timmy boy echoing 'The club is not for sale' in the distance.
We can but dream.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
lifelongcityfan
Well-Known Member
even though his payslip says Limited
stupot07
Well-Known Member
#Notonepennymore isn't going to help improve playing staff.
1
1940 oldfive
Guest
Bluegloucester
New Member
No, but it may hasten their exit.
lifelongcityfan
Well-Known Member
As if giving them money will. It hasn't for the last few seasons
Mary_Mungo_Midge
Well-Known Member
That campaign is a reaction. Blame the cause, not the effect
lifelongcityfan
Well-Known Member
nopm is exactly the right strategy..forces the enemy to sell, and still in time to reunite the club and ricoh with owners that will invest in the team
kornhoilo28
New Member
Why wont sisu sell?!!!!! even TF said sisu are keeping us going, im fearing the worse after tonights forum!
He is Self employed .......Sub -Contract .........and for all his lies he is here to sell us ...........Through his company Calimere Point .............Just like the role he took on at Charlton .Maybe if we could look at his Input there would provide some clues .......Dare I say have a Chat on their forums could be fruitful.
lifelongcityfan
Well-Known Member
of course they will selll...they are business men and the crap that is going on at the moment is just trying to force up the price
it will take them at least 6 years befor they show a profit, even then it will be small. By that time they have sunk in excess of 100milliion...if someone offered them a decent price they will take it
it will take them at least 6 years befor they show a profit, even then it will be small. By that time they have sunk in excess of 100milliion...if someone offered them a decent price they will take it
Why wont sisu sell?!!!!! even TF said sisu are keeping us going, im fearing the worse after tonights forum!
I'm in a minority of 1,but I believe Sisu started planning their exit at the end of 2011.....where we are now and where we end up are part of these plans....They're going on their terms..:jerkit:
Bluegloucester
New Member
What terms are they?
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Like Leicesters owners? £75m debt in loans since 2010
Why wont sisu sell?!!!!! even TF said sisu are keeping us going, im fearing the worse after tonights forum!
Apart from the input to last season ,they have us at Breakeven trading wise . They do not require to make any investment other than you or I could facilitate through regular banking .The only way we have to become more Indebted is through moving away and mangement /interest charges. :jerkit::jerkit:
:blue::blue::blue::blue:
lifelongcityfan
Well-Known Member
I would prefer to be in leics shoes...debt same as ours still with a chance of prem and a good standard of football with decent gates and own their own ground
us???? same debt (75m), owners obsessed with suing every company that has any dealing with us ,no ambitions on the playing side of things ( steven Prssley -- prime example) and doesnt give a shit about the fans##
what is your soution?
Last edited:
Does that Include buying the Stadium?
Bluegloucester
New Member
Sisu don't have that sort of money.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
I have no idea, but I think nopm can only harm the club. I understand if people don't want to travel out of city but nopm is get sisu out at all costs.
I wouldn't want to be in leicesters shoes, losing £15.5m per annum. I would prefer the Swansea model of living within our means and building something sustainable.
Their £75m debt has come in 3 years, sisu have (alegedly) spent £45m in 5 1/2 years the other £25m is historical debt.
Last edited:
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Does that Include buying the Stadium?
Not sure, I know they they're losing £15.5m per annum before player transfers.
Bluegloucester
New Member
How can we build something sustainable when we are alreay £70m in debt? We need new owners to achieve this.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
How are new owners going to do it? They won't start on £0 debt and investments will be loans adding more debt to the club.
I would welcome new owners, but I don't advocate the A.B.S (anyone but sisu) stance that I see the nopm campaign as representing.
SkyblueBazza
Well-Known Member
I suspect that is purely academic - whatever the outcome, the much-maligned TF will be moved out one way or another once clear ownership is sorted.