A Deal Is Simple Really (11 Viewers)

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
you know that bit in toy story when woody shouts at the delusional buzz: 'you are a toy!'.....

The have no interest in investing in the stadium to the benefit of the club. They want it cheap to benefit them.

I'm not repeating it again. Just no

yawnnnnnnnnnn!!
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Although a bit abstract, what benefits SISU benefits CCFC, or may make CCFC a more attractive proposition to any potential buyer. Who knows. It's likely to be better than the existing situation.

Potentially. I can see that unifying incomes does sum to a better whole. But.....

.... again, why are SISU back at the table? Could it be that there's something about the spectre of further financial investigations arising from a rejected CVA that they must avoid at all costs? Could this be so profound as to force the Football League into a change of heart? Or Appleton for that matter.

And what then, if other bidders were back at the table? And these fabled ownerships and incomes could be united under a different owner? What best then for CCFC?
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
I think the difference here is not so much supporting the entity know as SISU but supporting the entity know as the Sky Blues and finding a way that will achieve that. Owners will come and go. In the immediate term it is clear the football club is dependent on SISU. We need to get them back at the Ricoh. The stadium is council owned....that should change.

I'm not going to argue on the last point, I agree. But I refer you to my post above. Why are SISU back? And scratching beneath the surface, is the future so reliant on SISU?
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
While they own the football club and refuse to talk to any potential purchasers then yes, unfortunately we are reliant on SISU.

is the future so reliant on SISU?
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Seems not. The FL don't seem to give a toss and SISU seem prepared to leave ACL to sink or swim. I'm just hoping (though I still think it's a long shot) that common sense will prevail and a deal will be struck. The most important thing at the moment is to stay in Coventry.

But in turn, aren't SISU reliant on the Football League and ACL?
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
Wat the council and Higgs have put into the arena soes not equal its market value. The council put very little into the stadium, Tesco funded the majority. However that does not give the club the divine right to get a large chnk of the equity in the property for free. Why should SISU benefit from something they have not contributed to, the increased debts are mostly due to ineffective management we should not expect the council / ACL to subsidise their incompetency through giving them the stadium or part of for free or on the cheap.

IMO ACL won't sign the AVC
There will be a points deduction
The FA will step in and force CCFC to play at the Ricoh
There will be a mass player exodus by 31/08/13

Tesco didn't fund the stadium, they bought an adjacent plot of land the council owned, where the retail park now is & the council used the money they got from selling their land towards building the stadium.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
The Council put in roughly 10% of the cost of the complex. Not a bad return.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Don't disagree. But I guess they are like any owner - and I'm including any future custodians - they want a piece of the action.

With regards the complex, SISU put in feck all and are still after a return
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
MMM ...does it matter they are back as you put it? They are back, then that's all that matters surely? As others are beginning to realise a deal must be found and if they are at the table then lets hope one is found. Stop looking for the negative in everything, throw out the anger and hope a deal with SISU can be sorted that at least starts with our club back at the Ricoh and then take it from there............
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
Seems not. The FL don't seem to give a toss and SISU seem prepared to leave ACL to sink or swim. I'm just hoping (though I still think it's a long shot) that common sense will prevail and a deal will be struck. The most important thing at the moment is to stay in Coventry.

The problem is if ACL manage to swim without us (assuming Sixfields happens) and then use the pitch area for something or someone else then SISU will actually have to build a stadium if we are ever to return to Coventry. I would rate the chances of a new stadium being built as being about as good as my odds of being the sole jackpot winner for this Fridays Euro Millions lottery. Therefore we're likely to be ether be marooned forever somewhere else and/or homeless for the first time certainly in living memory. Not a happy prospect, the clue to where Coventry City Football Club should be playing is in the name.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
You would put your mortgage if you have one on that would you?

Yes I would how can not owning our ground not be under the current ownership or even if it is sold off to another party?
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
yawnnnnnnnnnn!!

You may well yawn, but if he's right (and a lot think he is), how does this help our club in the long term? I want the club to own the stadium, but I want the club's owners to care about the club. Only ok about SISU getting stadium IF 'responsible' owners buy it off them.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
You may well yawn, but if he's right (and a lot think he is), how does this help our club in the long term? I want the club to own the stadium, but I want the club's owners to care about the club. Only ok about SISU getting stadium IF 'responsible' owners buy it off them.

Fair enough.

How does not owning our stadium in the long term not help the Football Club?

The reason I Yawned is because MMM like about 100% of supporters don't want to move to Northampton, he doesn't want to see us move into a SISU built Stadium on the edge of the city, yet when it's mentioned SISU want to do a deal to purchase a stake in the Ricoh this is also condemned, where does it end? What does this guy want? I understand no one wants SISU as owners but lets be honest they're going nowhere and we better used to them being around.

I said this earlier but SISU don't have the club at heart like the fans do, the thing is they care about there investment and as much as it pains me to say it they're right to its there business they have to look at maximising its revenue streams and they have to make sacrifices or play hard ball in order for this to happen.

I want the Ricoh to be owned by CCFC 100% and if this is SISU then fine, but that's what needs to happen, it then opens up the avenue of allowing a better offer for the club to come in, in the future if they (SISU) decide to sell and I can't see a reason why this move wouldn't benefit CCFC..
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
MMM ...does it matter they are back as you put it? They are back, then that's all that matters surely? As others are beginning to realise a deal must be found and if they are at the table then lets hope one is found. Stop looking for the negative in everything, throw out the anger and hope a deal with SISU can be sorted that at least starts with our club back at the Ricoh and then take it from there............

I desperately want to see the club at the Ricoh. More than you can ever imagine. But SISU won't agree to that, or even talks associated with that without preconditions. The signing of the CVA and stadium ownership.

On the latter point, does it matter if SISU achieve ownership and sell on the bundled commodity? Well, it's be better than where we are. But still miles away from a situation I'd be happy with. Why? Because the 'added value' this once in a lifetime sale would generate would go to SISU. Not to the club, the players, the youth set up. It would be removed from the city. Surely, any City fan would yearn fit the worth staying with the latter?
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
Fair enough.

How does not owning our stadium in the long term not help the Football Club?

The reason I Yawned is because MMM like about 100% of supporters don't want to move to Northampton, he doesn't want to see us move into a SISU built Stadium on the edge of the city, yet when it's mentioned SISU want to do a deal to purchase a stake in the Ricoh this is also condemned, where does it end? What does this guy want? I understand no one wants SISU as owners but lets be honest they're going nowhere and we better used to them being around.

I said this earlier but SISU don't have the club at heart like the fans do, the thing is they care about there investment and as much as it pains me to say it they're right to its there business they have to look at maximising its revenue streams and they have to make sacrifices or play hard ball in order for this to happen.

I want the Ricoh to be owned by CCFC 100% and if this is SISU then fine, but that's what needs to happen, it then opens up the avenue of allowing a better offer for the club to come in, in the future if they (SISU) decide to sell and I can't see a reason why this move wouldn't benefit CCFC..

I agree with most of what you say, except having to get used to them being around (will only do that if they become more customer friendly - and can't
understand how no-one at SISU have seen what a massive own goal TF is for them). SISU aside, 100% agree need to be in Cov and own our own stadium. Big worry for me though is if SISU get hold of Ricoh, it becomes a cash cow and club sees nothing of it. Wish I owned a crystal ball.:eek:
 

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
You may well yawn, but if he's right (and a lot think he is), how does this help our club in the long term? I want the club to own the stadium, but I want the club's owners to care about the club. Only ok about SISU getting stadium IF 'responsible' owners buy it off them.

I agree with you Harry and that would be a good outcome.

Only problem I see would be SISU would inflate the price so much to get a decent return, only a screwball would buy it.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The reality is we have two options available to us. Sisu own CCFC and play at Northampton or sisu own CCFC and play at the Ricoh.

Staying at the Ricoh will mean ACL and the council significantly compromising from their current position. I am sure for many that pill may be bitter.

Ultimately though, for me the Ricoh is nothing without the football club. It could burn down tomorrow. It is a pointless structure with no benefit to me whatsoever. So I care not for the implications to ACL or the council.

For me this battle has to be won by sisu.
 

skybluehugh

New Member
That's what you believe, a speculated opinion based on hatred or a conception of the owners. No hard facts or anywhere near relative truth Dear Chap.

And what hard facts do you have to counter the argument? He has all the past experiences of SHITSU's dealings upto date. Which in my view would back it up, no bother.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
And what hard facts do you have to counter the argument? He has all the past experiences of SHITSU's dealings upto date. Which in my view would back it up, no bother.

Well have 2 choices. Watch us at the Ricoh or watch us crumble at Northampton. If watching at the Ricoh means ACL disappear who cares?

They are as greedy as sisu anyway. They have been like a parasite to the club since the ground opened. They need to go almost as much as sisu.
 

skybluehugh

New Member
Engage my brain? That's not nice.. Skipping over that.

I am not talking about SISU's business records, but would it benefit a CCFC owned by SISU to own the Arena, Simply put yes.

Mindless abuse? I haven't abused based on anyone's opinon, however I do believe people are slating this idea to purchase the Arena which frankly purchasing our own ground and being 100% joined at the hip is a fantastic idea, is based on hatred and disapproval of the company that owns CCFC.

But should you have any beteter ideas then this that would keep us in Coventry, maximise our revenue, pull the crowds in to a stadium and have the feeling of a place called "Home" feel free to enlighten me...


But CCFC will not own the ARENA, SHITSU will. And before you say it's the same thing it isn't. What it is is that SHITSU own the football club that plays in their ground. You can guarantee that they will charge CCFC for playing there, take ALL the profit from the food & beverage and charge the club for anything it can including office space properly. Yes them owning the ARENA is going to be great for the club, MY ARSE
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
But CCFC will not own the ARENA, SHITSU will. And before you say it's the same thing it isn't. What it is is that SHITSU own the football club that plays in their ground. You can guarantee that they will charge CCFC for playing there, take ALL the profit from the food & beverage and charge the club for anything it can including office space properly. Yes them owning the ARENA is going to be great for the club, MY ARSE

Wow a conspiracy theory..
 

skybluehugh

New Member
its not to some fans though,thats just it

some fans hate sisu more than they love ccfc

and that is the saddest part of all this.

If you really believe that then I'm sorry you really are a SHITU PLANT. what about the 1000's that went on the march on Saturday? Would you say they hated SHITSU more than loved the club. BOLLOCKS
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
If you really believe that then I'm sorry you really are a SHITU PLANT. what about the 1000's that went on the march on Saturday? Would you say they hated SHITSU more than loved the club. BOLLOCKS

Hugh do yourself a favour chap and take a chill pill, it doesn't matter how much you hate SISU or want them rid of our club, the truth is they won't be going anywhere.

Being able to do a deal to own the Ricoh can only benefit CCFC if you cannot see that then open your eyes.
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
125 year lease means any successors to SISU will be the councils puppets aswell? if there are claused that can be triggered to buy the ground outright i would agree with your deal.

the football club should own its own stadium.

Buy it outright
I would imagine that clause could be in there.
I take it you realise that it would cost about 150-200 million?
 

skybluehugh

New Member
Well have 2 choices. Watch us at the Ricoh or watch us crumble at Northampton. If watching at the Ricoh means ACL disappear who cares?

They are as greedy as sisu anyway. They have been like a parasite to the club since the ground opened. They need to go almost as much as sisu.

As I have stated on this forum and to you in previous posts. I will not watch CCFC at home weather it be in Northampton or the Richo until we have new owners. Also Grendel I am not as selfish as you. I want ACL to get the best deal not just for the club, but the CITY OF COVENTRY who laid out the money to build the place, when the club fucked up their finances.
 

skybluehugh

New Member
Hugh do yourself a favour chap and take a chill pill, it doesn't matter how much you hate SISU or want them rid of our club, the truth is they won't be going anywhere.

Being able to do a deal to own the Ricoh can only benefit CCFC if you cannot see that then open your eyes.

I have just taken you advice and taken the chill pill because if I hadn't I old be telling you to "go and take a running jump you condescending twat" but the pill must be working.
 

LB87ccfc

Member
Hugh do yourself a favour chap and take a chill pill, it doesn't matter how much you hate SISU or want them rid of our club, the truth is they won't be going anywhere.

Being able to do a deal to own the Ricoh can only benefit CCFC if you cannot see that then open your eyes.

Although the Football Club owning the Ricoh would be highly appealing, having Sisu controlling it would not be far off a major disaster
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
As I have stated on this forum and to you in previous posts. I will not watch CCFC at home weather it be in Northampton or the Richo until we have new owners. Also Grendel I am not as selfish as you. I want ACL to get the best deal not just for the club, but the CITY OF COVENTRY who laid out the money to build the place, when the club fucked up their finances.

The council tax payer contributed nothing to the building of the stadium and gain nothing from any profits it makes. You are talking nonsense.

You are letting blind hatred cloud Amy rational thought processes. Remember ACL and the council charged excessive rents as they had the club over a barrel and took full advantage. They have shown no interest in the club at all. We have the worst council owned arrangement in the country. Doncaster, Ipswich, forest, Swansea (check their deal out) all have far better caring councils and Stoke purchased the Brittania for much less than we would be charged. Your zealous defence for a disgusting greedy council exposes you for what you really are. If ACL are liquidated out if this process I will not deny that I will be pleased. They deserve all they get.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top