People are forgetting even hoffman offered to pay the fucking rent! sisu didnt have to pay anythingThe 150 thousand rent could have been sorted bofore they entered the administrators office to sign the cva . Why is linnel saying its not allowed ? He's said it 10 feckin times !
Why is he adamant that SISU couldnt have agreed ACL's offer before the CVA was signed? It may not have been able to form part of the CVA, but it could still have been agreed surely, allowing ACL to then agree to the CVA? Is he missing the point big time on purpose?
He said that Admin issue was more important. Yet agreement would have solved the admin issue, so I don't see his point. He kept interrupting the caller to repeat this....
Why has Linnell introduced the section saying 'The club is facing liquidation after the CVA was not agreed as they have failed to negotiate a rent agreement for the Ricoh.
Then when anyone says why hasn't SISU agreed to the rent negotiation he replies 'The rent agreement wasn't on the table it was only the CVA'
Is he bonkers? Or am I?
The shit he comes out with no way is he a true cov fan
The 150 thousand rent could have been sorted bofore they entered the administrators office to sign the cva . Why is linnel saying its not allowed ? He's said it 10 feckin times !
Well he's not stupid so he must be doing it on purpose, but he's had his own slant on it from day one. I challenged him on here about being neutral, he said himself on here that everyone approaches an issue with their own opinion - obviously himself included!! NOT NEUTRAL!
Well he's not stupid so he must be doing it on purpose, but he's had his own slant on it from day one. I challenged him on here about being neutral, he said himself on here that everyone approaches an issue with their own opinion - obviously himself included!! NOT NEUTRAL!
Stuart is NEUTRAL and is pointing out that many more people are at fault here, NOT just the current owners! PUSB