SIR ERNIE
Well-Known Member
protest against ACL for what exactly?
...for refusing to give SISU the Ricoh for peanuts?
SISU Appeal Judicial Review (15 Viewers)
- Thread starter AFCCOVENTRY
- Start date
protest against ACL for what exactly?
...for refusing to give SISU the Ricoh for peanuts?
cloughie
Well-Known Member
It was so poor it made you respond, touch a nerve did it
Do you want ccfc back at the Ricoh?
Well there are two (rather three in fact) parties that need to agree a deal. Putting pressure on one part alone won't bring a result.
Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
And you know what you end up with if you pay peanuts..................a bunch of monkeys (disguised as clowns)
Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
The local Authority chose not to accept the only offer in town
Sorry Dillifagmother - what was the offer?
Sorry Dillifagmother - what was the offer?
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
I am not alluding anything of the sort. Bottom line is CCFC Ltd will be liquidated and after the professional costs involved ACL will recieve very little if anything at all. The article seems to imply the club will pay ACL £590k it wont and does not need to.
Administration can not end a lease, an administrator does not have the power to dismiss a property lease. A liquidator does. In a CVA the lease period becomes irrelevant (it was 42 years btw) because the landlord becomes entitled to compensation to cover how long it might take to get a new client. Often this is 3 years rent, in this case I believe Appleton gave around 1 year. The intention therefore has always been to liquidate CCFC Ltd because unless the landlord cancels the lease or there is a contractual break clause thats the only way of breaking it
The debt on the lease was stopped from getting bigger under the lease by the administration because the administrator used his legal right not to occupy the premises. The debt up to the date of administration didnt disappear or as you put it "removed from debt"
It was ACL that voted against the CVA.
The JR application has been renewed. The plaintiff is allowed 7 days to make that "renewal" so that they can have a verbal hearing to see if they can persuade the judge to take it forward. It is not a new case it is not an appeal it is due process and known as renewal which allows an oral examination of the case
Not rocket science to figure out that they would follow the process as far as they can. No great insight in that. It keeps a pressure of sorts on ACl certainly means further cost
Last edited:
SIR ERNIE
Well-Known Member
I want Cov back at the Ricoh under new owners.
So do ACL.
You're right there are two parties to pressure:
1. NOPM to SISU
2. embarrass the FL by exposing their incompetence in allowing this shower anywhere near a football club.
Seyeclops666
New Member
All your effort and you're still a sour .....
Last edited:
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
And the costs will be paid by......
Well I suppose they just end up as CCFC debt but it won't be the Council and ACL as planned.
This particular weapon is know backfiring
Well I suppose they just end up as CCFC debt but it won't be the Council and ACL as planned.
This particular weapon is know backfiring
Why don't you organise one? How about a protest march through the city, all those people that have been waving "ACL Out" banners are sure to join you.
cloughie
Well-Known Member
that could be 2 with grendel.............. no just 1 as the likes of grendel could even be arsed to go on the march or the ricoh on sunday
2nd thoughts protest against ACL, CCC, yes he will be up for it, just nothing against the wonderful sisu who just take the piss out of the fans and the club
whats left of it that is
Last edited:
Florence1898
New Member
There is only one stadium and that's the Ricoh. There is no intention of building a new stadium if there was they would not keep throwing money at the JR. Ironically they will never get the stadium as there is the little matter of the freehold and they forget all financing can be refinanced.
Florence1898
New Member
It will be many months before any appeal is heard, there are a lot more games to play at Northampton with fewer and fewer fans
The Prefect
Active Member
I understood that the Football League insisted that the CVA payments were to be made whether or not CCFC Ltd was liquidated as part of the agreement to give Otium the Golden Share. I suppose you could view ACL as being a football related creditor (that should be paid in full as per the FL's insolvency rules) as they provided the pitch Coventry City played on for so many years.
It wouldn't surprise me if the Football League insisted that HMRC were paid also as part of the same deal for Otium to get the Golden Share. At the end of the day ACL and HMRC were the only two substantial creditors when you remove any debts owed to SISU related companies.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
With fans like you and RIPHunt we deserve all we get. I am against all sides.
You and RiP are so far up ACL's arse they'll need a JCB to extract you.
You and your happy clappy council loving crew are far more responsible for our demise than fans who go to Northampton.
Samo
Well-Known Member
I have been using this site for a good while now and in all that time I've never seen a decent, well rounded, considered view from this poster. Just spite, wind up, nastiness and negativity. I'd advise all to ignore him.
You wear your misanthropy like a shroud for all to see.
BurbageSkyBlues
New Member
Never seen anything that remotely resembles creative suggestions to move forward.....just negativity towards other posters, usually in the form of sarcasm or piss taking.
Ignore is the best policy!
georgehudson
Well-Known Member
'i am against all sides',
a typo perhaps,
or maybe the words of a misguided paroxysm,
grendel, this is planet earth
a typo perhaps,
or maybe the words of a misguided paroxysm,
grendel, this is planet earth
SkyBlueBlood
Member
Laughed out of Court, but they want to go back for more?????????????
The laughing stock of English Football, but still best buddies with the Football League??????????
KUNTZ
The laughing stock of English Football, but still best buddies with the Football League??????????
KUNTZ
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Why are there hardly any people who think like that?
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Remind me how that one finished for Keyser?
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
The two out of ten is how many people think like you
There are apparently a few that post on here - but you will never see them on the same march together.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
He walked away and disappeared. Only the myth was left.
Last edited:
RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
I am sorry but I can't see it. When and IF SISU return to Coventry it will be of their own choice and they won't be forced down that road.
Of course we need to get Coventry back in Coventry, but I can't see how we are any closer to that happening to when the first protest began?
skyblueiom
Well-Known Member
Although not obvious, this is still investors' money, so I cant see them being overly chuffed with their wonderful investment....and you think anyone would be happy to invest in a fund managed by these clowns? The more bad press the better imho!
RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
Agreed, although future investor's will be a rareity for SISU that doesn't help CCFC and getting rid of them.
The investment being Coventry City Football Club was doomed from the start unless we had a company that was willing to invest £20,000,000 and do their background and that's without touching the playing side of the club.
SkyblueBazza
Well-Known Member
If anyone needs any more convincing - instead of funding expensive court actions, designed to further distress ACL...they might double (or more) the ticket sales at Northampton by funding free travel to/from Sickfields...which would then help cover the cost of Clarke, Baker & Murphy. Suggests to me that what happens on the pitch is of little importance to our owners.