Christie's Off Then... (5 Viewers)

wal3590

Well-Known Member
Let him go........his heart isn't at coventry anymore as his performances have proved over the last few weeks. Definately a case of his head being turned by his money grabbing agent!.....Good Luck to the lad and I'm sure he will enjoy warming the bench just like Bigirimana and Westwood for the first two seasons.....We have plenty of cover and Philips looks a really good prospect and IMO will be a better defender

Did make me chuckle how you can spell Bigirimana right but not "Definately" :claping hands:
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
Did make me chuckle how you can spell Bigirimana right but not "Definately" :claping hands:

I've given up worrying about the spelling of definitely now. It seems 1 in 10 can spell it.
One that's annoying me is Jack Wilshere. I've heard Wilkshire, Wiltshere, Wilktshire, Wiltkzszheere. How hard is it.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
I like Cyrus but to be honest, I think Christie is a little overrated. He does well at this level because of his sheer pace, but defensively he's not brilliant and technically he's not up to much.

If we get anywhere close to £1mil I think that would be great business. Phillips/Willis are more than good enough to step up.
 

CJ_covblaze

Well-Known Member
I reckon if it goes to tribunal we will get maybe 300k.

No doubt it will all be sisus fault but I think we have cover for him

To add a bit of perspective here's some of the tribunal fees we've paid in the past...
Robbie Simpson's 40k
Leon Best's 650k up front plus 400k in add ons
Gary Borrowdale's was 400k up front and 250k in add ons.

For Simpson I think Cambridge were robbed. For Best it was about right. As for Borrowdale if he was worth 650k a tribunal will probably smash Bale's transfer record for Christie!
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
To add a bit of perspective here's some of the tribunal fees we've paid in the past...
Robbie Simpson's 40k
Leon Best's 650k up front plus 400k in add ons
Gary Borrowdale's was 400k up front and 250k in add ons.

For Simpson I think Cambridge were robbed. For Best it was about right. As for Borrowdale if he was worth 650k a tribunal will probably smash Bale's transfer record for Christie!
I still can't believe what QPR allegedly paid for him ,was It £650K.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I'd guess £500k-750k considering the games he's played and the fact he's been with us forever. How many did he play in the Championship? Isn't there a formula they use for tribunerals?

Anyway, I'd expect £750k if he goes in Jan.
 

mrtrench

Well-Known Member
This is BAU (business as usual). Most clubs must sell their best players when bigger clubs come-a-calling. The Northampton Sky Blues are no exception.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
This is BAU (business as usual). Most clubs must sell their best players when bigger clubs come-a-calling. The Northampton Sky Blues are no exception.

I think most think it's decent business to sell to be fair, not seen a single person blame Sisu or even the fans for this one.
 
We'll get half a million quid plus ad ons if we're lucky. We're a skint League 1 club and he is out of contract in the summer. It's a must however he must be sold in January if he won't sign a contract; losing the likes of Westie and Gunna in the past for free was a disaster.
 

Sky Blues

Active Member
I thought so, but let's not let common sense get in the way of a jolly good witch hunt.

Was that aimed at me? A "witch hunt" for stating the bleedin' obvious that you will get more for good, young, British players if you don't let them get into the last six months of their contract?

Fernando, I'm not suggesting Christie is the same or better than the Gareth Bale of six years ago, but the Gareth Bale of six years ago is not the same as the Gareth Bale of today, or even four years ago for that matter.

The point isn't that players won't move on, the point is some clubs are better at extracting a good return when they have to sell their young players than others. If you point that out here though it seems you get accused of conducting a "witch hunt"
 

Nick

Administrator
I think most think it's decent business to sell to be fair, not seen a single person blame Sisu or even the fans for this one.

You must have missed this, get your head out of the sand :p

Of course it would be Sisu's fault. If we were a team playing in our own ground, not constantly dipping in and out of embargo, not constantly in court, not under the threat of total shutdown - he might - just might, think CCFC was a decent place to play football.
Take your head out of the sand Nick. Get your arse off the fence, just for once.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
To add a bit of perspective here's some of the tribunal fees we've paid in the past...
Robbie Simpson's 40k
Leon Best's 650k up front plus 400k in add ons
Gary Borrowdale's was 400k up front and 250k in add ons.

For Simpson I think Cambridge were robbed. For Best it was about right. As for Borrowdale if he was worth 650k a tribunal will probably smash Bale's transfer record for Christie!

Not sure if this has been mentioned but tribunals are set fees now based on how many games the player has played and at what level, we would get around 200-300k for Christie I think
 

Nick

Administrator
Was that aimed at me? A "witch hunt" for stating the bleedin' obvious that you will get more for good, young, British players if you don't let them get into the last six months of their contract?

Fernando, I'm not suggesting Christie is the same or better than the Gareth Bale of six years ago, but the Gareth Bale of six years ago is not the same as the Gareth Bale of today, or even four years ago for that matter.

The point isn't that players won't move on, the point is some clubs are better at extracting a good return when they have to sell their young players than others. If you point that out here though it seems you get accused of conducting a "witch hunt"

No sorry, it wasn't aimed at you.

I do think since Waggot has been here we have been better at "bargaining" when it comes to transfers both in and out though.
 

SkyBlueJord

Active Member
We'll get half a million quid plus ad ons if we're lucky. We're a skint League 1 club and he is out of contract in the summer. It's a must however he must be sold in January if he won't sign a contract; losing the likes of Westie and Gunna in the past for free was a disaster.

I'm pretty sure we turned down a bid of £600,000 in the summer for him from Huddersfield?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
You must have missed this, get your head out of the sand :p

Genuinely did. Was that specifically about Christie or sales in general? I've seen that latter a few times, but not noticed the former.
 

Nick

Administrator
Genuinely did. Was that specifically about Christie or sales in general? I've seen that latter a few times, but not noticed the former.

No it was in this thread after I said:

I reckon if it goes to tribunal we will get maybe 300k.

No doubt it will all be sisus fault but I think we have cover for him
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
I seem to remember someone saying about £500k, which was probably inclusive of add ons.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)

It was around 150k.
 

andyboy81

New Member
Would rather him stay until the end of his contract and move on a free / Tribunal.

We would probably get £300k MAX for him which in this day in ages is virtually a kick in the bollocks. Wouldn't be invested back in the team anyway and only free up the wages that would need to be replaced.
 

magic82ball

New Member
I reckon if it goes to tribunal we will get maybe 300k.

No doubt it will all be sisus fault but I think we have cover for him

Lets use your quote in context shall we Nick.

If it goes to tribunal it will definitely be SISU fault for:

a. Not tying him down to a longer contract in the summer after a good couple of seasons ala Westwood, Gunnarsson, King, etc.
b. Not selling him in the summer when we could have achieved a greater fee.

No one is doubting were a selling club but it just appears were not very efficient at it. That is most certainly SISU's fault.

No witch hunt here, just facts.
 

andyboy81

New Member
Lets use your quote in context shall we Nick.

If it goes to tribunal it will definitely be SISU fault for:

a. Not tying him down to a longer contract in the summer after a good couple of seasons ala Westwood, Gunnarsson, King, etc.
b. Not selling him in the summer when we could have achieved a greater fee.

No one is doubting were a selling club but it just appears were not very efficient at it. That is most certainly SISU's fault.

No witch hunt here, just facts.

a) But Surely if he refuses to sign there isnt really that much you can do?
b) Wasn't the Huddersfield offer the only one on the table and that was about £250k - £300k. They'll probably get around that at tribunal so whats the point in releasing him a year early? Pretty sure If they had took that figure people would have gone Mental on here!
 

magic82ball

New Member
How do you know he was refusing to sign in the summer? Or even the summer before that when his potential was clear? was a longer term contract even offered then?

Also was he offered to clubs? I cant believe all of this sudden interest has come from his form this season considering his lack of it and injury problems. Should he have been offered to the supposed interest clubs in the summer I am sure we would of got an offer above the Huddersfield one.

Further more if the speculation of interest is to be believed, the club should sell in January for the purported £1m rather than risk a derisory tribunal fee. We have Philips, Clarke & Willis who are all perfectly capable understudies in that position. As a fan, I would not want this as I don't believe the money would be reinvested but from a business perspective, this would be the better option.
 

jesus-wept

New Member
Doesn't matter if we sold for £200k, half a million, or a million the football team will not see one penny of it AND we lose a player, a very good player, is that what you all call good business. I hope if you read these posts Cyruss you go and tell Waggott to do one stay atleast until the summer and you have the money in your back pocket, not sisu.
 

magic82ball

New Member
Doesn't matter if we sold for £200k, half a million, or a million the football team will not see one penny of it AND we lose a player, a very good player, is that what you all call good business. I hope if you read these posts Cyruss you go and tell Waggott to do one stay atleast until the summer and you have the money in your back pocket, not sisu.

Did you read my last sentence?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top