Issues Could Be Solved... (6 Viewers)

[chiefdave]

“I have to keep an open mind if any application were to come in. The council has no choice, if any application comes in it would have to be looked at"

“I had not heard anything and it came as a complete surprise to me. But I would say, if there was a speculative enquiry put into planning it would not necessarily have been put to me until later in the process."

Clear enough to me, if a future application came in there is no choice but to consider it (that's a long way from saying there is any chance of getting permission) and any talks the club have had with N&B council are at such an early stage no one has even bothered to tell him about it.

Yet more evidence that SISU have got absolutly nowhere in over 6 months.

 

---

[italiahorse]

Clear enough to me, if a future application came in there is no choice but to consider it (that's a long way from saying there is any chance of getting permission) and any talks the club have had with N&B council are at such an early stage no one has even bothered to tell him about it.

Yet more evidence that SISU have got absolutly nowhere in over 6 months.

The clock is ticking

"Should the club not comply with this timeframe, the matter will be considered by The Football League Board at the relevant time with reference to both the permission to relocate and the membership agreement entered into in August 2013. Expulsion from the League would be a realistic outcome at that stage"

 

[chiefdave]

"Should the club not comply with this timeframe, the matter will be considered by The Football League Board at the relevant time with reference to both the permission to relocate and the membership agreement entered into in August 2013. Expulsion from the League would be a realistic outcome at that stage"

We know they are only checking once a year which will be between seasons. If, as seems likley, by the first check there are no plans, site purchased or planning permission applied for something must be done by the league surely?

 

[skyblueinBaku]

We know they are only checking once a year which will be between seasons. If, as seems likley, by the first check there are no plans, site purchased or planning permission applied for something must be done by the league surely?

Sisu will spin some BS and the FL will assume their normal supine position.

 

[duffer]

Just to go back to the planning issues for Exhall. SISU's project is ultimately for a 25,000 seater-stadium, so presumably they'll want to make sure that they get planning permission for something that size. In itself, that makes things harder.

Worse though, far worse than that, they've said that selling part of the development for retail is a key part of the funding. So you're trying to get permission for not just a stadium, but also for a large retail development. This on green belt land, where there is generally a presumption against development except for exceptional circumstances. Regardless of the stadium, there's hardly an exceptional need for another large retail park in this area, given what already exists nearby on the Ricoh site (which seemingly itself has scope for further retail development).

It's an absolute non-starter this - it's as farcical as the Brandon idea.

If you couldn't get housing through, which is an absolute priority in planning terms, there's surely no way that retail will be considered.

 

[Paxman II]

A modular stadium is the way these days. MK Dons are doing it. The increase could be done during the close season.
As for the practicality of the location and the cost scenario it is difficult to match them up.
A lot would depend on the developers requirements and the council. Planning can be approved quicker under certain conditions.

Still think it's al a bit crazy though. I think it just needs the owners of the Ricoh Arena to let it be known they will sell it freehold and name their price.

Maybe our friends Hoffman and Uncle Joe' s consortium friends will buy it? Then buy out SISU's franchise and unite the two? Thought they would have bought the football club off SISU by now while it is suffering at Sixfileds without a base at it's lowest ebb? Once they had that even for a crazy figure that SISU demand of say £25m would they not be able to buy the Ricoh for it current valuation of some £15m? yada yada yada...

 

[mrbluesky87]

Can someone help?? I live near the Ricoh and is only a walk away, Exhall not much further however I would be very reluctant to go as it is outside of the City Boundary. Does anyone know of any clubs that play outside of the boundary of which they represent??? I doubt for one minute this will happen but just in case.

 

[SkyBlueBlood]

FFS if there were problems with access for a few houses how do they expect it to be better when somewhere between 2000 and 30000 fans turn up on a Saturday!

 

[SkyBlueBlood]

Can someone help?? I live near the Ricoh and is only a walk away, Exhall not much further however I would be very reluctant to go as it is outside of the City Boundary. Does anyone know of any clubs that play outside of the boundary of which they represent??? I doubt for one minute this will happen but just in case.

Grimsby play in Cleethorpes and coventry play in Northampton!

 

[bigfatronssba]

Money can solve most problems, but no matter how much you throw at it this land is still in the greenbelt.

Football grounds dont get built on the greenbelt.

 

[runner]

Money can solve most problems, but no matter how much you throw at it this land is still in the greenbelt.

Football grounds dont get built on the greenbelt.

It's not going to Exhall ... don't think it will be anywhere if honest, but if it is ... my gut would be Warwick Uni area.

 

[Broken Hearted Sky Blue]

Grimsby play in Cleethorpes and coventry play in Northampton!

Grimsby have always played in Cleethorpes

 

[skybluetony176]

Can someone help?? I live near the Ricoh and is only a walk away, Exhall not much further however I would be very reluctant to go as it is outside of the City Boundary. Does anyone know of any clubs that play outside of the boundary of which they represent??? I doubt for one minute this will happen but just in case.

Nottingham Forest. They have had several site's around Nottingham previously but unlike what sisu are proposing they up sized and moved to what was best for the club and it's ambition. It's just the other side of a river which is the boundary, not too different to the M6 and Coventry
Minus ambition off course.

 

[shmmeee]

A modular stadium is the way these days. MK Dons are doing it. The increase could be done during the close season.

The architect said at the forum it would take 6-9 months to implement a new phase of seating. So it certainly couldn't be done close season.

 

[shmmeee]

Nottingham Forest. They have had several site's around Nottingham previously but unlike what sisu are proposing they up sized and moved to what was best for the club and it's ambition. It's just the other side of a river which is the boundary, not too different to the M6 and Coventry
Minus ambition off course.

Not sure I'd agree it's like the M6, I lived in West Bridgeford for 2 years and would've always said I lived in Nottingham.

Besides, it was in the City boundary when they built it, hence the "City Ground".

Nottingham was granted its Charter as a City in 1897 and it was called the City Ground to commemorate this as the land on which it stands was at that time within the City boundary.

Also, they're Nottingham Forest, not Nottingham City and the forest in question (Sherwood) isn't in the city.

So very different to this I'd say.

 

[stupot07]

Not sure I'd agree it's like the M6, I lived in West Bridgeford for 2 years and would've always said I lived in Nottingham.

Besides, it was in the City boundary when they built it, hence the "City Ground".



Also, they're Nottingham Forest, not Nottingham City and the forest in question (Sherwood) isn't in the city.

So very different to this I'd say.

Don't they call it Exhall Coventry, even though it's in Bedworth?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

 

[skybluefred]

Don't they call it Exhall Coventry, even though it's in Bedworth?
Who do they pay rates to--Coventry or Nuneaton/Bedworth.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

 

[stupot07]

Who do Grimsby pay their rates to? Where does Nottingham forest pay their rates to, where do man Utd paid their rates?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

 

[Broken Hearted Sky Blue]

Who do Grimsby pay their rates to? Where does Nottingham forest pay their rates to, where do man Utd paid their rates?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

To be honest I dont give a fuck where THEY pay their rates,I dont give a fuck what THEIR geographical location is, I care about one club and that is Coventry City Football Club end fucking of

 

[bigfatronssba]

Who do Grimsby pay their rates to? Where does Nottingham forest pay their rates to, where do man Utd paid their rates?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

Unlike those places you have named we live in a city with clearly defined boundaries.

 

[stupot07]

Unlike those places you have named we live in a city with clearly defined boundaries.

Which isn't what you were saying 6 months ago....

http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threa...ers-Investors-Please-Note?p=437283#post437283

 

[Hobo]

Such a heated debate on rumour and speculation. The floundering SISU haven't even bought land in Exhall yet.

 

[letsallsingtogether]

So do forest and united not play in there historical grounds?

That was the comparison that idiot on CWR gave. If they were moved away from there current homes do you think they would be happy and endorse it?

Who do Grimsby pay their rates to? Where does Nottingham forest pay their rates to, where do man Utd paid their rates?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

 

[bigfatronssba]

Which isn't what you were saying 6 months ago....

http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threa...ers-Investors-Please-Note?p=437283#post437283

Opinions change, even yours it would seem.

Do you still agree with these words? :-

"I have no idea why exhall, is classed as Coventry, it is quite clearly Bedworth. And Brandon and binley woods are small villages in Warwickshire."

 

[Leamington Pete]

Just to go back to the planning issues for Exhall. SISU's project is ultimately for a 25,000 seater-stadium, so presumably they'll want to
make sure that they get planning permission for something that size. In itself, that makes things harder.

Worse though, far worse than that, they've said that selling part of the development for retail is a key part of the funding. So you're trying to get permission for not just
a stadium, but also for a large retail development. This on green belt land, where there is generally a presumption against development except for exceptional circumstances. Regardless of the stadium, there's hardly an exceptional need for another large retail park in this area, given what already exists nearby on the Ricoh site (which seemingly itself has scope for further retail development).


It's an absolute non-starter this - it's as farcical as the Brandon idea.

If you couldn't get housing through, which is an absolute priority in planning terms, there's surely no way that retail will be considered.

Absolutely bang on. So many hoops to jump through to get planning anyone can see it is very very unlikely it will ever be granted. If this is really the site SISU are banking on they truly are on the ropes surely?

 

[Leamington Pete]

Such a heated debate on rumour and speculation. The floundering SISU haven't even bought land in Exhall yet.

Floundering indeed. Usually clubs announce new stadium and show artist impressions when they've got a site and council approval. We haven't even decided which bit of land we'd LIKE to buy, let alone decided which council we're going to do battle with. What a joke.

 

[Otis]

Floundering indeed. Usually clubs announce new stadium and show artist impressions when they've got a site and council approval. We haven't even decided which bit of land we'd LIKE to buy, let alone decided which council we're going to do battle with. What a joke.

No, you've got it wrong, Pete.

We will draw up the artist's impression, then sell season tickets and then car park places and then advertsing space.

And only then we will try and find some land and then try and find some money and then try and build it.

 

[Leamington Pete]

No, you've got it wrong, Pete.

We will draw up the artist's impression, then sell season tickets and then car park places and then advertsing space.

And only then we will try and find some land and then try and find some money and then try and build it.

Of course yes, I forgot. Stop stressing everyone, everything will be ok. Good old SISU.

 

[stupot07]

So do forest and united not play in there historical grounds?

That was the comparison that idiot on CWR gave. If they were moved away from there current homes do you think they would be happy and endorse it?

Our historical ground now has flats and house on it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

 

[stupot07]

Opinions change, even yours it would seem.

Do you still agree with these words? :-

"I have no idea why exhall, is classed as Coventry, it is quite clearly Bedworth. And Brandon and binley woods are small villages in Warwickshire."

Yes, I still agree with that. I don't want a new ground, but If a new ground (or even the Ricoh original) was built there or Brandon or say the other side of baggington airport just outside Coventry it would not put me off going. There are other examples of clubs playing outside their boundary.

This is all smoke and mirrors anyway, we'll be back at the Ricoh, but not until after the JR.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

 

[Calista]

Regardless of administrative boundaries, Old Trafford and the City Ground are clearly in Manchester and Nottingham respectively. You can argue all day about whether Exhall is in Coventry or not (it comes down to whether you regard Bedworth and Coventry as one place).

It doesn’t matter – what matters is that the Ricoh Arena is clearly not in any other place than Coventry. The financial pain of its construction was dumped on the people of Coventry by the football club, and it was completed with the express purpose of providing a permanent home for the city’s football team.

As Shmmeee so rightly said, in buying Coventry City Football Club, SISU got into the Coventry business whether they like it or not. Openly stating that their new site must be outside the city boundaries is just playing political games at the fans’ expense, and is surely not acceptable in planning terms.

 

[Captain Dart]

It's not going to Exhall ... don't think it will be anywhere if honest, but if it is ... my gut would be Warwick Uni area.

But no discussions with Warwick Uni
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/university-warwick-rules-out-becoming-6505383