But if you're flying the flag of financial prudence, what if they had sold 2.5K of the additional allocation and sent 1K back, like they claim happened last time?
Wouldn't their share of the 2.5K additional tickets sold to CCFC fans covered any loss associated with the 1K return?
Could have fulfilled the criteria of financial prudence you laud, and kept more fans happy, no?
You can't argue that MMM because the scenario's are totally different, firstly the game is Televised live so that might put people off making the trip, secondly it's a Friday and you'd have to ensure travel from Coventry leaving at least 15:30-16:00 which means hitting all the traffic and nightmare of all the travelling involved going into London, finally its January, most people haven't been paid and the financial hangover is still an impact from Christmas, I doubt that we would of sold an extra 1K of the extra allocation had it been given to us.
Well lets answer your question using the thread at least 30 different posters have responded to this thread of those 30, only 3 posters have objective views of this move (10%) a minority of fans unfortunately. It may have helped please the people who can't be pleased, but if they had sold 1000 out of the 3500 avaliable, they still would have of had to pay £81,250 (roughly) to Arsenal when they would of only made £32,500 on the second allocation. That's almost a loss of £50,000, it's not worth it and the correct decision.