Shock result (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Deleted member 5849
  • Start date
Forums New posts
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Cutting through the mentalism ;) who can honestly put their hands up and say they're surprised by the result?

I'll admit to being surprised. From the outside it looked like an open and shut case that Higgs were owed the money.

Just shows why I'm neither a lawyer, nor a judge ;)
 
Nick

Nick

Administrator
I am quite surprised, I have only read the tweets about it and it seemed the judge wasn't keen on sisu
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
Deleted member 5849 said:
Cutting through the mentalism ;) who can honestly put their hands up and say they're surprised by the result?

I'll admit to being surprised. From the outside it looked like an open and shut case that Higgs were owed the money.

Just shows why I'm neither a lawyer, nor a judge ;)
Click to expand...

Ditto ,seems he focused heavily on the Afters ,rather than the real/true intnetions of the Pre and during .
 
skybluetony176

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I taught myself not to be surprised after sisu won the JR appeal. I realised there and then that I know as much about law as grendulls accountant knows about accounting.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
Deleted member 5849 said:
Cutting through the mentalism ;) who can honestly put their hands up and say they're surprised by the result?

I'll admit to being surprised. From the outside it looked like an open and shut case that Higgs were owed the money.

Just shows why I'm neither a lawyer, nor a judge ;)
Click to expand...

I was only surprised after
SISU gave evidence and the judges response to that evidence and their QC summing up.

Although the Higgs' QC never really took full advantage of SISU's evidence.

There was more on here than he used. Such as bashing people in court. Tim saying ACL were about to go bust. Tim saying public ally ACL were not worth anything really.

SISU saying the price they offered was just charity

That they were going to pull funding if they did not get a deal

That the decision to not pay rent was separate.

The Higgs QC never really dug into these points.
 
Nick

Nick

Administrator
Maybe it will make people try to establish the facts and see things as a judge would with personal hatred aside?
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
dongonzalos said:
I was only surprised after
SISU gave evidence and the judges response to that evidence and their QC summing up.

Although the Higgs' QC never really took full advantage of SISU's evidence.

There was more on here than he used. Such as bashing people in court. Tim saying ACL were about to go bust. Tim saying public ally ACL were not worth anything really.

SISU saying the price they offered was just charity

That they were going to pull funding if they did not get a deal

That the decision to not pay rent was separate.

The Higgs QC never really dug into these points.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you should offer your services next time?
 
R

RFC

Well-Known Member
Deleted member 5849 said:
Cutting through the mentalism ;) who can honestly put their hands up and say they're surprised by the result?

I'll admit to being surprised. From the outside it looked like an open and shut case that Higgs were owed the money.

Just shows why I'm neither a lawyer, nor a judge ;)
Click to expand...


Not at all surprised, more to come after 10th June!!!!!!!!!! PUSB
 
R

RFC

Well-Known Member
What's required are a few more 'open' minds to step back and look at the 'bigger' picture.
 
letsallsingtogether

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
What so the judge will say sisu you lied CCC you lied get out of my court..


We have then achieved what.

Back to square one even I could't take that.
RFC said:
Not at all surprised, more to come after 10th June!!!!!!!!!! PUSB
Click to expand...
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
martcov said:
Are you one of those "open minds"? Up until now I had you as a SISU spokesman...
Click to expand...

tbh if I wanted to embark on a major media assault from the ACL side, the first thing I'd do is employ RFC as he can't help but make SISU look bad!
 
Houchens Head

Houchens Head

Fairly well known member from Malvern
Shock result? I didn't even know we were playing! Who were we up against? Man U? Liverpool? Did we win? What was the score?
 
Nick

Nick

Administrator
Interesting how somebody who seems to know their stuff, was in court seemed to know the outcome...

Was he the Judge? ;)
 
duffer

duffer

Well-Known Member
Must confess that after the stuff about the six-weeks exclusivity came out, I thought it was pretty much nailed on for Higgs. What was surprising was how far down the track the judge was prepared to go in digging up stuff from August and beyond. I'm also surprised at how much of an easy ride the SISU witness seemed to get compared to the AEHC ones.

You have to presume that the charity thought they had a reasonably solid case - if there's one thing that's certain about court, it's that nothing is certain about court!

In terms of the JR, there's some stuff in the document in the other thread that makes me wonder about SISU's case. I'm not convinced this result actually makes it more definite that they'll win there, but it's a sure reminder that there's no way to be certain.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
duffer said:
I'm not convinced this result actually makes it more definite that they'll win there.
Click to expand...

I said before this I thought it had absolutely no bearing on the JR, and I'm not going to change my mind now.

Two separate cases, two different objectives.
 
fernandopartridge

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Deleted member 5849 said:
Cutting through the mentalism ;) who can honestly put their hands up and say they're surprised by the result?

I'll admit to being surprised. From the outside it looked like an open and shut case that Higgs were owed the money.

Just shows why I'm neither a lawyer, nor a judge ;)
Click to expand...

I am not surprised. This is the nature of litigation.

Like I say, despite the warm words and soundbites, the parties rarely demonstrate any commitment to reaching an agreement.
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Deleted member 5849 said:
Cutting through the mentalism ;) who can honestly put their hands up and say they're surprised by the result?

I'll admit to being surprised. From the outside it looked like an open and shut case that Higgs were owed the money.

Just shows why I'm neither a lawyer, nor a judge ;)
Click to expand...

Read my comment page 173 Higgs v SISU row court thingy that went on for ever
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top