It's interesting that people are asking to hear the council side of things.
All we have heard for the last 2 years via the PR company is the council side of things and SISU's story really hasn't changed that much
I think there is more to come if it gets to the JR and the council will be shown in even more of a bad light
It would be very hard for SISU to try and have the JR without portraying the council in a bad light.
Still not sure if I have seen anything that portrays them in a bad light so far.
Some emails where on the back drop of the owner threatening to stop funding the club unless a deal is agreed for the Ricoh.
The same owner who stopped paying the rent which devalued a company, they then tried to buy for the lower value they created.
The council see a way to stop them buying that company on the cheap.
The council have no legal obligation to tell SISU what they are doing. Do they have an ethical obligation I would say in light if SISU's behaviour no.
The only email that was a bit wrong was the language used by the Higgs charity. However that is born out of sheer frustration that SISU via relegation, not agreeing a rent deal and not paying the rent have devalued the charities' shares.
If the council say yes those emails are correct we thought if SISU became aware of our plan they would scupper it. We had no legal obligation to tell them so we didn't.
What does that actually mean?
When the council announced they had done the buy out. Did you think that they had told SISU before? I didn't, I don't think anybody did. Why is that a shock revaluation now?
Also at the time if I recall I think TF or the club may have said words to the effect that what the council did does not affect SISU's plans and is nothing to do with them?
Now it is massively important?