Grendel
Well-Known Member
Many people despised Churchill , do the research !!
Really? Because he changed political parties? Your historic analysis actually is without merit.
Many people despised Churchill , do the research !!
Yes it is with merit, many people, I repeat , despised him. Look at 1945 election result as evidence. So please refrain from pompous "put downs" you make to many on this forum.Really? Because he changed political parties? Your historic analysis actually is without merit.
Don't think he would have been bothered "Moonlight Sonata" springs to mind.
Wonderful. Diggerdaly clearly has a master plan all of his own. However he seems to be keeping it to himself.
Go on, tell us your strategy.
If anyone hasn't seen the excellent One night in November then I'd really recommend it.
Given you say you have no interest in the council you spend a hell of a lot of time and effort defending them.
Funny you and duffer seem to think Winston Churchill was a dreadful leader but hey ho.
Of course its s good strategy. Defeat the council leader over her and the councils stance on the Ricoh. It will send shock waves to self serving politicians. The truth I suspect is if it comes to the club getting hold of the Ricoh or stay in Northampton you and duffer will favour the latter.
Time to decide - club or the council.
So, sorry if this has been asked before, but what exactly is this protest parties policy on the Ricoh?
So, sorry if this has been asked before, but what exactly is this protest parties policy on the Ricoh?
Saw it very good
I see the smear campaign is underway and it's being claimed that Patton isn't a Sky Blue and actually supports Spurs. Whilst you can of course support the cause without supporting the team given that you would imagine the majority of votes would come from city fans thats not going to be a help, unless of course its not true in which case ignore all this!
I'll dip in with a quick reply to a point that has come up a few times and then catch up with the rest in the morning.
'Political opportunist'
The story behind Brian standing is this...
I'd had chats with a few people over the past few weeks who had all mentioned Brian as someone to approach as he had been pretty vocal on the Ricoh affair and had a good reputation around Coventry as a stand up bloke who put principles over party politics. I rang him and he was ill in bed with 'flu but agreed to look through our previous press release etc. and talk more. After a bit more of a chat he agreed to stand, we had a few people in Holbrooks jump at the chance to nominate him and here we are.
So rather than him jumping on a passing ship, is was me dropping the king's shilling in his pint
To be honest not too bothered about what party Churchill was, he wasn't saying he could get us back in Coventry.
Chief dave, he says he is " Coventry born and bred but supports Tottenham" in his video. No smears just facts.
Really? Because he changed political parties? Your historic analysis actually is without merit.
Chief dave, he says he is " Coventry born and bred but supports Tottenham" in his video. No smears just facts.
Is it just me, or are you the most boring person in the world ...... ever?
Is it just me, or are you the most boring person in the world ...... ever?
Personally, I'd vote for you.
Sorry Torch the votes have been counted .... You were second !!
It's an honour being runner up to you.
Does it matter who he supports?
Does it matter who he supports?
All the "usual suspects" getting their knickers in a twist. We only need MMM, Schmeee and SBJ for a full "condemnation" set. Funny how holding a banner with muppets on outside an empty office is "doing something" and this isn't.
You've got to laugh, haven't you?
Agree with you there. As I've said before the solution is very easy. The club purchase Higgs share (and pay for it, not put it on the never never!), they then clear the loan and purchase CCC share. CCC then move the lease to say a 99 year lease with peppercorn rent. If the club (i.e. SISU) want to alter any of the deals in place with existing tenants they do so once they are running the whole complex. The solution is really not that difficult unless any party is determined not to agree a deal or has unrealistic demands. If SISU were to state they would be happy with this I think you would see a lot of pressure on the council to agree to it.
Rob, can Brian come up with a compelling reason as to why sisu can be entrusted with the stadium?