You know fuck all, but you keep stirring stuff like you do.
I wanted everybody to be anonymous, there was an accountant there by chance but I don't think ML is an accountant so for him to be quizzed about detailed accounts stuff was probably way over his head too, so wouldn't be as effective. Everybody there was anonymous to ML, if there was somebody he knew I thought the meeting would have panned out differently as obviously things may not have been said or things covered over.
If OSB would like to have a chat with ML, then I would be happy to pass his details over but when the person there who was an accountant (who I am sure won't mind me saying probably hasn't studied the CCFC situation as much as OSB) asked about accountancy things, ML couldn't answer as it wasn't his field.
Again, why are you trying to stir as much as you are? Nobody else seems fussed, nobody else makes posts demanding apologies from individuals and yet you won't take me up on the offer on the chance to speak to him for yourself? Does he know who you are or something?