Shameless Money Grabbing (2 Viewers)

J

Jack Griffin

Guest
Well even if it wasn't then it tells the lie to this bit

Highlight of the season

The club choosing The Grace Research Fund as shirt ‘sponsor’ – a rare touch of class and altruism.

Was it an altruistic move, I think not, it was just the only option open & a commercial sponsor would have been chosen in preference if anyone had offered.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Personally, I think Newcastle being sponsored by Wonga is a lot worse than a one-off for a big game.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member

The Reverend Skyblue

Well-Known Member
Two points

a) I have just liked two Torchy posts in a single thread, something that has never happened before.

b) I finally fixed my lawnmower after a month of many failed attempts
 
Last edited:
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
Two points

a) I have just liked two Torchy posts in a single thread, something that has never happened before.

b) I finally fixed my lawnmower after a month of many failed attempts

What are the chances of that!
Harry+Hill.JPG

Ooooohh.. I might go off Harry Hill, Vile supporter!!!
 

oscillatewildly

Well-Known Member
Probably no more shameless than back in '87 when the club sold 1987/88 season tkts early with the guarantee of a cup final tkt when you purchased one.
It used to be known as a "results game", but as a couple of posters have already pointed out, it is very much a "money game". Especially when a windfall occurs, as in both those episodes.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Don't stoke city and Fulham have betting companies as sponsors?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I don't have a problem with the one off sponsor for the arsenal game. I'd even go as far as saying it displays good business sense to cash on the opportunity.

Thing is, it's consistent bad decision making (ie lack of business sense, where what's best for the club and not sisu's investors is concerned) that put us in such a ridiculous position where we had the option. We should have had a full time paying sponsor from day one of the season right until the last game of the season. The fact that nobody found us an attractive option isva failure.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
Nothing wrong with it at all.

However, let's not kid ourselves. Allowing the charity to have their names on the shirts was purely because no one else would sponsor them.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Nothing wrong with it at all.

However, let's not kid ourselves. Allowing the charity to have their names on the shirts was purely because no one else would sponsor them.

And of course, wasn't actually the club's decision, but CBRE's.

It was shameless money grabbing, in that they didn't show any shame, and they were grabbing money. You could argue about whether shame was needed, of course.

Out of interest: do we know how much the club got from sponsorship this season compared to other seasons?
 

Sky Blue Dal

Well-Known Member
Is it shameless? I would say no.

But

Its a shame why they couldn't find a space on the shirt to add Grace research fund logo. Surely it wouldn't have caused any problem with 12Bet if they did.
 
Last edited:

Astute

Well-Known Member
What are the chances of that!
Harry+Hill.JPG

Ooooohh.. I might go off Harry Hill, Vile supporter!!!

Used to have lots of vile supporters but not the club I would call Vile. Similar colours though :D
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
Perfectly sensible thing to do in my opinion what club would turn it down? I don't see his problem with it. Surely any sensible business would seek to maximise all its income streams ..............:thinking about:

I thought the Grace name on the kit was only supposed to have been for a month or two anyway and the club didn't actually receive anything
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Perfectly sensible thing to do in my opinion what club would turn it down? I don't see his problem with it. Surely any sensible business would seek to maximise all its income streams ..............:thinking about:

I thought the Grace name on the kit was only supposed to have been for a month or two anyway and the club didn't actually receive anything

Indeed !!

For £24M according to Daniel Gidney
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top