Council and Sky Blues in court tomorrow (23 Viewers)

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
No one liquidates through spite - absurd Also this bit about not owning the Ricoh - id ask OSB if that is commercially sensible if I were you.[/QUOTE said:
They do liquidate because a company is losing several million pounds each year though. And after all, you keep telling us that there are no serious buyers out there.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

wingy

Well-Known Member
When would the deadline be for SISU to pull out of the JR ? Is it too late for that?

Not suggesting they would, I just wondered...

Around the time they realise SP will walk + the time for correspondence to bounce between the two parties .
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
And how does the stance of "don't let sisu get the Ricoh for cheap" help the club?

It doesn't. The council is subject to public scrutiny and they are accountable to the voters who are not exclusively CCFC fans ( or rather CCFC is not the highest voter priority ). As a fan, I want the club to survive as a priority, but there are the interests of 315000 people to consider.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
But in both those cases sisu didn't batter anyone in court.

Sisu have now been beaten by both ACL and CCC in court, and failed to beat the Higgs.

Didn't ACL lose?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Didn't ACL lose?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)

You mean with the admin process? I didn't think ACL had been in court yet, though frankly I'm losing track of court cases, we have more of those than matches these days.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
No one liquidates through spite - absurd

Also this bit about not owning the Ricoh - id ask OSB if that is commercially sensible if I were you.

And as usual you only read what you want to or what goes best with some kind of point you are trying to put together. So now I said that they will liquidate our club I suppose.

Liquidation is still a possibility though. They have threatened to liquidate our club for over two years. So if no bidder comes forward for our club that is willing to pay as much as liquidating our club and they don't want to rent the Ricoh, build a stadium and don't want to keep loaning our club money what do you say they would do? Like I said I don't think it will happen, but with seeing the way they do things it wouldn't be a shock.
 
Last edited:

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I don't think they would liquidate, there'll always be a buyer, but I expect them to threaten it again if things aren't going their way. It's the last card in their hand.

Of course, the real question is: what do we as fans do if they do sell? Do we accept anyone again? Do we ask some serious questions of them (if that's still possible with Sisu's systematic destruction of any fan representation)?

Personally, I'm not convinced Byng would be any better if it is him. But I worry that most will be do focussed on getting rid of Sisu we won't care what's next.

I know I'm in a minority here, but there are some options worse than liquidation IMO and dragging out the death of the club a few more years is one of them.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
You mean with the admin process? I didn't think ACL had been in court yet, though frankly I'm losing track of court cases, we have more of those than matches these days.

ACL have taken SISU to court twice over rent arrears and won on both occasions.
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
Sick Boy, on the contrary, because of Sisu we DON'T have the kind of club we deserve.

It would have to take some really appalling owners for fans to hope they lose court cases against the Council.
To be fair though most people see the difference between a custodian of your club (who it seems does not care)and the club itself.
 

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
No one at all would be celebrating if CCFC went . After your secret meeting with Labovich , do you think they will play their last spiteful card if the JR doesn't go their way and liquidate CCFC along with all their debts OR put it up for sale and try to at least get something back...

Think he missed this one.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
ACL have taken SISU to court twice over rent arrears and won on both occasions.

Was that the orders just before admin? I'd forgotten about those. I thought he meant the actual admin process, which I'm not sure anyone "won".
 

John_Silletts_Nose

Well-Known Member
I think the point is that the case is about the procedures undertaken by CCC regarding the loan to ACL.

So not really to do with CCFC as such. Any contact was between SISU and CCC so SISU would already have title to their side of the documents.

The costs. These must be mounting up. 8 barristers and lawyers for the Higgs case 5 for this today, time and cost of putting a 110 page statement together with 2500 supporting documents, a detailed experts report on the ACL loan deal........ and we haven't got to the main event yet.

I know things are never clear cut in putting things to a court but their counter claim dismissed as no basis in law, a lengthy & costly statement dismissed, an experts report stated as not relevant ............. does make you wonder as to what they are doing and the advice they are getting

It wasn't really a case of winners or losers as such today ....... it was a process to go through that is quite normal usually.....but it does come across as a miscalculation by SISU though

ps Simon could have put SISU QC on twitter stupot would have been more accurate ;)

I would be interested to understand the total costs involved for all the areas you outlined and include the costs involved in the rent dispute, administration of CCFC and CCFC H, etc.

I expect these costs to be significant and the club could have simply purchased half of ACL for £6.5 million. This choice would have led to no points deductions, no transfer embargos, no loss of fans, higher income and maybe even a promotion to a higher league!
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I would be interested to understand the total costs involved for all the areas you outlined and include the costs involved in the rent dispute, administration of CCFC and CCFC H, etc.

I expect these costs to be significant and the club could have simply purchased half of ACL for £6.5 million. This choice would have led to no points deductions, no transfer embargos, no loss of fans, higher income and maybe even a promotion to a higher league!

They're backed into a corner now. It reminds me of the teenagers I work with, keep pushing and they fight harder and harder not to lose face. Give them some time on their own, out of the spotlight and they usually see the error of their ways and calm down.
 

John_Silletts_Nose

Well-Known Member
They're backed into a corner now. It reminds me of the teenagers I work with, keep pushing and they fight harder and harder not to lose face. Give them some time on their own, out of the spotlight and they usually see the error of their ways and calm down.

Or you could speak to their parents, in this case the investors.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
You mean with the admin process? I didn't think ACL had been in court yet, though frankly I'm losing track of court cases, we have more of those than matches these days.

Misread it, though he's said Higgs.

Re: Admin process, no one won that one :(


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
Misread it, though he's said Higgs.

Re: Admin process, no one won that one :(


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)

Re the admin process: Paul Appletons bank account says differently.
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
I would be interested to understand the total costs involved for all the areas you outlined and include the costs involved in the rent dispute, administration of CCFC and CCFC H, etc.

I expect these costs to be significant and the club could have simply purchased half of ACL for £6.5 million. This choice would have led to no points deductions, no transfer embargos, no loss of fans, higher income and maybe even a promotion to a higher league!

Am I imagining it or was it not 4.5 million?
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
And how does the stance of "don't let sisu get the Ricoh for cheap" help the club?

Because on five years form if SISU did get the Ricoh on the cheap there is no evidence it would benefit the club anyway. That is the point! People do not trust SISU because of the way they, no one else has handled things.
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
Because on five years form if SISU did get the Ricoh on the cheap there is no evidence it would benefit the club anyway. That is the point! People do not trust SISU because of the way they, no one else has handled things.

So far I do not feel that they have made decisions in the best interests of the club.
We need owners who realise success on the pitch is the answer...
 

sw88

Chief Commentator!
I think the point is that the case is about the procedures undertaken by CCC regarding the loan to ACL.

So not really to do with CCFC as such. Any contact was between SISU and CCC so SISU would already have title to their side of the documents.

The costs. These must be mounting up. 8 barristers and lawyers for the Higgs case 5 for this today, time and cost of putting a 110 page statement together with 2500 supporting documents, a detailed experts report on the ACL loan deal........ and we haven't got to the main event yet.

I know things are never clear cut in putting things to a court but their counter claim dismissed as no basis in law, a lengthy & costly statement dismissed, an experts report stated as not relevant ............. does make you wonder as to what they are doing and the advice they are getting

It wasn't really a case of winners or losers as such today ....... it was a process to go through that is quite normal usually.....but it does come across as a miscalculation by SISU though

ps Simon could have put SISU QC on twitter stupot would have been more accurate ;)

I think today was a waste of the judges time!

For SISU to turn up and want to add more and more evidence is laughable. Glad the judge seen sense to dismiss most of their requests
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top