Grendel's the slavish obsessive here, which is why I ignore him. Everything for him is about the council. I'm guessing he went to the toilet once and they didn't come round to flush it for him. Or he's just a troll - because as soon as he gets challenged for evidence he throws out a couple of insults, a couple of strange questions, and then runs away. Watch and see.
As for GMK, I know a few people on there in real life. They're top lads, and we've had a few pints together in the past. If Grendel is as much of an arse in person as is he is on this forum then I doubt they'd have much time for him either.
Nope never run away and never avoid answering questions.
Your statements are steeped in irony. You are the slavish defender of the council and will swoop and swerve and dig out as much evidence as possible to defend them.
I never understand the troll argument. To me its the argument of the lazy and the defeated. What would your definition of a troll be on a football site? Someone who takes the side of the club and whose sole objective is the return to the Ricoh or someone who would only want them back if they were "fair" to a third party? A third party that have been distinctly unfair to them in the past.
I never in any of your posts see any association or emotional attachment to the club. I never see any statement that even could remotely seem you as a supporter.
Your frequent argument of breaking the lease being a bad thing is ultimately disturbing. Even the most die hard of council trolls (there easy to throw the cheap and lazy insult isn't it?) accept the rent was too high. Yet you are a frequent opponent of this stance.
You see I'm not interested in "right" or "wrong" - I am purely interested in the club. If there was some collateral damage on the way to third parties why would I care?
That's the difference - one poster purely interested in the club - the other not interested at all.
