Judicial review day 3 - judgement day (3 Viewers)

J

Jack Griffin

Guest
The prudential borrowing increased the council's exposure by 155% from 12/13 according to their website. Wonder what the original £9m was for.

The original contribution to the Arena building project..?
 

Sub

Well-Known Member
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert · now Sisu finished. Judge says he will reserve judgment. Won't hand it down before June 30.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
part of me hopes the judge sums up with...

"it seems to me that this is all standard business practice, but don't get me wrong, 2 turkeys does not an eagle make. I am not posturing and there is a belief that I wont do this, but I will consider my verdict and have already narrowed it down to 2 or 3 possibilities. I will announce it within 3 weeks."
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
part of me hopes the judge sums up with...

"it seems to me that this is all standard business practice, but don't get me wrong, 2 turkeys does not an eagle make. I am not posturing and there is a belief that I wont do this, but I will consider my verdict and have already narrowed it down to 2 or 3 possibilities. I will announce it within 3 weeks."

bloody hell, it is "within 3 weeks"

almost poetic justice
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
As this has turned into MumsNet, anyone been to ThinkTank in Birmingham? Was thinking of taking the little one.

Not been, but I'd recommend Burton Dassett. £1.50 to park, and massive hills for them to climb up and roll down, hence they're completely knackered by the time they get home and I can watch the football in peace in the evening. You owe me a pint. :)
 

Godiva

Well-Known Member
So are you saying that the matches held at the RIcoh during the London Olympics could have possibly been held at the Parken Stadium in Copenhagen?:eek:

No - I am saying that international matches have been played at the Ricoh - so de facto the Ricoh is an international stadium.
Any public means given to the Ricoh has to be considered unfair trade unless the same means are given to all other international stadiums in the EU.
Otherwise it's unfair trade between member states.
 

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
In that case ARVO is the same as the 5 funds who brought in the initial loans. Is he saying is was ARVO all the way?

I don't get why this is relevant to the state aid thing. Are they trying to say they have put in £50M which shows they have money and could have brought the YB loan if they had the chance?
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
wonder if this will impact on Pressleys "we will be very active in the last 2 weeks of the month"
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Not been, but I'd recommend Burton Dassett. £1.50 to park, and massive hills for them to climb up and roll down, hence they're completely knackered by the time they get home and I can watch the football in peace in the evening. You owe me a pint. :)

Burton Dassett is indeed a quality (if windy!) place. Many happy weekends of my youth spent plummetting down the dunes by what's now the toilets!
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
No - I am saying that international matches have been played at the Ricoh - so de facto the Ricoh is an international stadium.
Any public means given to the Ricoh has to be considered unfair trade unless the same means are given to all other international stadiums in the EU.
Otherwise it's unfair trade between member states.

How many since the loan? Any lined up?
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
Not been, but I'd recommend Burton Dassett. £1.50 to park, and massive hills for them to climb up and roll down, hence they're completely knackered by the time they get home and I can watch the football in peace in the evening. You owe me a pint. :)

Don't take your family there at night for Gods sake!
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
So are we at least going to get a 3 week proper PR war to talk about, or will people be gagged until the decision so as not to pre-empt the judge?
 

Sky Blues

Active Member
The Football League fixture list is released June 18, so decisions on whether City are in or out of the league (for whatever reason) will have to be made before the results of the judicial review are known.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert · 12s Sisu QC says ARVO has invested over £50m into Coventry City since 2008.

The audited accounts do not show that............... it was for ARVO 13.4m by 31/05/13 plus interest £1.56m...... and the Cayman Islands register of Mutuals shows ARVO Master fund as registered 20/03/2012. I am sure there is a reasonable explanation though.

Total owed to SISU investors by 31/05/13 was £28.5m plus interest £456k

all together £43.91 if you accept it was all cash paid in on behalf of the club, and if that claim is true means in last year it has cost SISU/ARVO at least £7m to have invested over £50m to date
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
The Football League fixture list is released June 18, so decisions on whether City are in or out of the league (for whatever reason) will have to be made before the results of the judicial review are known.

It won't effect them, CCFC are playing at Sixfields next season whatever the judgement.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
The Football League fixture list is released June 18, so decisions on whether City are in or out of the league (for whatever reason) will have to be made before the results of the judicial review are known.

We'll be in the league, playing at Sixfields. It's the easiest option and therefore the one the FL will take.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
So are we at least going to get a 3 week proper PR war to talk about, or will people be gagged until the decision so as not to pre-empt the judge?

I expect Labovich will get on CWR soon, then there is this forum on 27th, just before the judgement, pity wish it was a few days after.. too many question will still be unanswered.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
I expect Labovich will get on CWR soon, then there is this forum on 27th, just before the judgement, pity wish it was a few days after.. too many question will still be unanswered.

I know it's a paradoxical thing to say as I think the forum's daft anyway... but surely, *surely* they have to rearrange it now for after the verdict?!?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top