While the tone is much better than most things we have heard from SISU recently I have to be honest and say I struggle to take anything they say at face value. They've been caught out too many times being less than truthful and 'plan a' seems to change every 5 minutes. Also the timing, with the march tomorrow, seems a touch suspicious.
That said if they are serious the way forward was made very clear by ACL. Pay the £590K, stop any further legal action and we'll talk.
I said on a thread earlier in the week matchday revenues are to all intents and purposes irrelevant if we're talking about a short term, 2 year, deal while SISU build the new ground. We can all see the net revenues at the Ricoh are hugely preferable to those at Sixfields so if they really do want to move forward it seems to be counterproductive to bring that up again.
How would you calculate a fair rent? The £150K, £400K inclusive of matchday costs, seems reasonable to me but as they haven't mentioned a number do they want it lower. I would have thought if a previous offer was acceptable they would state they would return if that previous offer was still valid.
As some have said actions speak louder than words and until we see some evidence that SISU are making a genuine attempt to move back to the Ricoh I will take statements like this with more than a pinch of salt.