The offer (17 Viewers)

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
  1. Three-year contract with one-year rolling if required.
  2. Priority use of stadium on match days.
  3. Rent benchmarked to division the club is in.
  4. Club pays match day costs.
  5. Access to F&B revenues for days the club is renting the stadium
Some more detail:
  1. So only paying for 23–30ish days per season.
  2. Would need some details looked at to cover any cup replays or other last minute schedule changes, e.g. TV
  3. For League 1 in the £175k–200k range. Would increase if we got promotion to Championship/Premier League (!). Rent is payment to use the stadium match day facilities.
  4. Club match day costs are for things like stewarding, police, medical & emergency etc.
  5. The eternal food & beverages issue. No idea what the club would want but I'd imagine Compass wouldn't be too unhappy sharing a percentage of the revenues of an extra 250,000ish punters a year.

[SUB][I've heard – although I have no proof so take it with a pinch of salt and if anyone has heard similar/different, please chip in – that as part of their deal, Compass pay ACL nearly £1.5m per annum and keep all revenue. This would mean that ACL don't have as much motivation to do this deal and might also have to negotiate on their deal with Compass to sort out a deal with CCFC. But as I say, no proof so could be a red herring.][/SUB]

The only problem I see is f&b because of the complications involved. But this could be offset with all of the parking revenue and pitch side advertising which should be worth far more.
 

Steve1974

New Member
I'm very sceptical about this. Getting cov home would be great but with one major problem! Sisu. Let's face facts and look at the history here. Do you trust them? I don't.
 

Baginton

New Member
Higher wattage bulbs in the offices? Remember how dark and dingy they were last time?

SISU are professionals with an attention for detail, never forget that.

Some eight year old told the us government to change font when printing documents, and it saves them £400 million
dont overlook the small things !

PUSB
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
More likely that a new place would be paid for in a similar way to how the Ricoh was; get development land, sell bits to retail concerns, ker-ching.

Not sure that's going to work in the present environment. That type of retail is nowhere near as strong as it was when the Ricoh got built, a lot of the major retailers are sitting on a large number of sites having shelved plans to build on them. The attraction of the Ricoh site was land in what would have been considered a prime position that was previously unavailable. Hard to imagine a site outside the city that would have the same attraction. That's before you even consider how many sites are available that a suitable retailer couldn't just purchase themselves if they wanted to build a store.

If it was that easy wouldn't every club be getting new grounds built for them without having to put a penny in! Down here Pompey have recently tried that trick. A plot of land on the Fratton Park site was sold to Tesco however there were planning restrictions meaning it could only be used by the football club. The original plan was for Pompey to get a new stand as part of the deal involving change of use, they actually ended up with (or at least will if the store ever gets built which is doubtful) a few spaces in Tesco car park for the club to use on matchday. That's a million miles from getting someone to fund a new stadium and that's for a site slap bang in the middle of the city.
 

quinn1971

Well-Known Member
Not sure that's going to work in the present environment. That type of retail is nowhere near as strong as it was when the Ricoh got built, a lot of the major retailers are sitting on a large number of sites having shelved plans to build on them. The attraction of the Ricoh site was land in what would have been considered a prime position that was previously unavailable. Hard to imagine a site outside the city that would have the same attraction. That's before you even consider how many sites are available that a suitable retailer couldn't just purchase themselves if they wanted to build a store.

If it was that easy wouldn't every club be getting new grounds built for them without having to put a penny in! Down here Pompey have recently tried that trick. A plot of land on the Fratton Park site was sold to Tesco however there were planning restrictions meaning it could only be used by the football club. The original plan was for Pompey to get a new stand as part of the deal involving change of use, they actually ended up with (or at least will if the store ever gets built which is doubtful) a few spaces in Tesco car park for the club to use on matchday. That's a million miles from getting someone to fund a new stadium and that's for a site slap bang in the middle of the city.


Probably got this wrong but if sisu and acl do somehow get back round the table and start to negotiate a deal to get us back to the Ricoh won't compass have to get involved, not sure how it works with compass but would sisu have to pay off compass if they want the f&b money, I'm probably wrong but it seems compass has hardly been mentioned in any of this, can't see them just giving it away. Anybody know how things would stand if compass didn't want to sell to sisu, could that happen ?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
More likely that a new place would be paid for in a similar way to how the Ricoh was; get development land, sell bits to retail concerns, ker-ching.

That's really really not likely. Especially without the help of a local council to clear the way.

I don't think Sisu have given a thought to financing, considering it's not going to be built. Much like the rest of the stadium, they've said whatever sounds good to someone not really paying too much attention.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
If that is true, it doesn't sound too unreasonable does it?

If they can agree that, why not a long term deal?

That gives Sisu everything they've been asking for since day 1. It's what they said they wanted in the original 42 year lease before the spat their dummy out and left.

Why would they need a new stadium if they're getting all the match day revenues? If they don't need a new stadium, why a 3 year deal?

Just stop fucking about and come back FFS
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Also: says it all the the offer has come on here through Sisu's own Weber Shandwick, but not just sent to ACL.

Stop pissing about FFS.
 

The Gentleman

Well-Known Member
More likely that a new place would be paid for in a similar way to how the Ricoh was; get development land, sell bits to retail concerns, ker-ching.

Just curious Rob, but what retail outlets do you think that it could be attached too? Considering the areas that it could potentially be, do you think that they would be classed as a prime retail locations?
 

Rob S

Well-Known Member
The two stadium funding details I've heard in the last month or so are 'with joint investors' and 'co-development, like the Ricoh' (massively simplified but you get the gist). If there is to be a new stadium – and I'm not ruling it in or out but until ground is broken, there isn't one, only the possibility – it will go along the lines of

  1. Buy land (most likely an option based on planning approval)
  2. Announce purchase but not location
  3. Apply for outline planning
  4. Lots of people go completely nuts
  5. Er...
No idea which retailers would be/have been approached but if the location is good enough, who knows? I'd guess at a supermarket as they seem to immune to competition and one or other of the chains is on the up at any one time. (E.g. Morrisons popping up on the old Ford foundry site in Leam almost next door to Sainsbury.)

Oh, and apparently the club want all match day revenue so include ads, car parks etc.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Yes but Morrisons are struggling have just made a lot of managers redundant, and now Tesco have fallen behind so it must be an Aldi store or maybe a pound land?

We are saturated with out of town shopping areas looks like they have jumped on the wagon late as usual?

The new one behind Morrisons, is halve empty so who would give permission for more?


The two stadium funding details I've heard in the last month or so are 'with joint investors' and 'co-development, like the Ricoh' (massively simplified but you get the gist). If there is to be a new stadium – and I'm not ruling it in or out but until ground is broken, there isn't one, only the possibility – it will go along the lines of

  1. Buy land (most likely an option based on planning approval)
  2. Announce purchase but not location
  3. Apply for outline planning
  4. Lots of people go completely nuts
  5. Er...
No idea which retailers would be/have been approached but if the location is good enough, who knows? I'd guess at a supermarket as they seem to immune to competition and one or other of the chains is on the up at any one time. (E.g. Morrisons popping up on the old Ford foundry site in Leam almost next door to Sainsbury.)

Oh, and apparently the club want all match day revenue so include ads, car parks etc.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
The two stadium funding details I've heard in the last month or so are 'with joint investors' and 'co-development, like the Ricoh' (massively simplified but you get the gist).

Neither of those options seem to hold up to much scrutiny. A joint investor will want a decent shot at a return and any co-development will need SISU to have something that is more attractive than all the other plots of lands available. In both cases you're really reliant on SISU somehow adding value to a piece of land, how are they going to do that? In this market that would be incredibly difficult in a prime city centre location let alone a site that will be outside the city.

Seems to me like one of those things that sounds great when they say it but as soon as you look below the soundbites it doesn't really add up.
 

Rob S

Well-Known Member
It's all a moot point until we know more about potential location & it's certainly not my job to sell any ideas of a new ground as, er, Getting Cov Back to the Ricoh is the priority for me. There's nothing wrong with being skeptical or cynical but dismissing it outright doesn't make much sense either. A north of Cov location would bring different options to a south-of one and the size will too. I think the preference is for a campus (ground, training & retail in one) but that would need a bigger plot. Other factors like accessibility come into play too.

Bottom line is, as soon as/if they announce any land deal, we'll see what happens.
 

The Gentleman

Well-Known Member
It's all a moot point until we know more about potential location & it's certainly not my job to sell any ideas of a new ground as, er, Getting Cov Back to the Ricoh is the priority for me. There's nothing wrong with being skeptical or cynical but dismissing it outright doesn't make much sense either. A north of Cov location would bring different options to a south-of one and the size will too. I think the preference is for a campus (ground, training & retail in one) but that would need a bigger plot. Other factors like accessibility come into play too.

Bottom line is, as soon as/if they announce any land deal, we'll see what happens.

Jesus Christ Rob, you sure you're not on the Sisu PR payroll? I think dismissing outright makes perfect sense. Every line we have been sold by Sisu on the new stadium has been bullshit so I think it goes way beyond skeptical and cynical. You give me one shred of positive movement on the new stadium, go on just one. The flip side being I can give you numerous quotes, lies and constant bullshit from Sisu about it. You talk about supermarkets but a large Tesco in very prime land in Wolverhampton has been shelved so tell me where you would need one outside a city or even further afield now. Shoppers are moving and an Aldi or Lidl attracts a lot of shoppers on foot so could you see them walking miles there and back?

Also how long would these retailers be willing to wait for the thing to be built? Using the Shrewsbury model rather than the Rotherham one because Legoland will be something no-one bar Sisu want, would these retailers be willing to wait upto 9 years after investing on the chance that Sisu might fuck off in the meantime? You won't have a couple of farmers objecting, you will have wealthy landowners, vote grabbers, bored pensioners, and a shit load of fans in opposition to name a few.

Lastly, your final line means sod all because as most people know, because buying land is buying land, nothing more and nothing less. Until we see groundworks happening then I think we can all dismiss it outright.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top