I was just making an observation from what people have said on this site.
I personally don't care if someone has done his time and changed their ways then fine.
If they continue their wrong doing that is a different matter.
After all most have us have done things we are not proud of.
I know I have but hey was a long time ago.
I agree with you there, if they have done their time, etc etc.
Two exceptions I can think of though are Hughes and McCormick.
Yeh its good to have a back up target man now. Or maybe even play them together sometimes.
I am glad that the manager has realised what a difference ohysical presence makes. Could be a very good signing.
We just need one tough tackling centre mid now and we have no excuses. I just hope that's the plan for waggot and co
Now madine is here are we going to change to 451?
Like when we signed a couple of wingers the formation changed to play without themHow? .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
yes that makes perfect sense the first thing madine will do is show players how to throw punches rather than score some goalsHasn't he been inside for assault? Not sure he's the type of person you want around with a young squad. Wouldn't you want to bring in decent role models?
I agree with you there, if they have done their time, etc etc.
Two exceptions I can think of though are Hughes and McCormick.
Now madine is here are we going to change to 451?
6 senior strikers at the club and only one upfront? Would seem strange
Yeah sorry, maybe a smiley would have helpedI think that was his point! To be fair, you can't tell sarcasm easily over the net
Nonsense signing in my opinion. Unless we plan to play 3 up top one of Jackson or Nouble will miss out, and neither should.
As for Madine himself...bad attitude, one season wonder, appears to be more prolific with his fist than his foot. Really don't see how he benefits us, especially since the loan spell is only just long enough for him to unpack a bag before he'll be packing it again.
Our main issue is that we've conceded more goals than every single side outside the bottom 3. But yes, that can be solved with another striker can't it?
It does say an initial 1 month loan so option to extend must be there. We are desperate for a different goalie on loan thoughNonsense signing in my opinion. Unless we plan to play 3 up top one of Jackson or Nouble will miss out, and neither should.
As for Madine himself...bad attitude, one season wonder, appears to be more prolific with his fist than his foot. Really don't see how he benefits us, especially since the loan spell is only just long enough for him to unpack a bag before he'll be packing it again.
Our main issue is that we've conceded more goals than every single side outside the bottom 3. But yes, that can be solved with another striker can't it?
I don't think it's a bad signing, I just don't think they have their priorities straight.
I don't think it's a bad signing, I just don't think they have their priorities straight.
How can goals not be a priority?
None of our strikers are hardly prolific though, are they?
Between the 5 they have 12 goals between them I think in all competitions, which collectively as a strike force isn't terrible but not great either.
Collectively I'd mark our strikers as average but the goalkeeping position is terrible, maybe Pressley has a keeper lined up in which case my comments don't really matter but if there isn't one lined up or actively looking then I think it's poor decision making.
Nouble 3 in 5
Miller 2 in 12
Jackson 2 in 13
Tudguy 0 in 9
Mcqoid 5 in 15
Actually looking at that mcqoid gets a bit of undue stick.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
New GK
Phillips
Martin
Reda
Haynes
O'Brien
Barton (Or new cm)
Fleck
Coulibaly
Nouble
Jackson
Bench:
Burge
Willis
Webster
Thomas
McQuoid
Madine
Miller
Play-offs here we come
LMFAO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors