jimmyhillsfanclub
Well-Known Member
Pardon me but I think you'll find we've signed several strikers since Wilsons departure...... do keep up dear.
Bournemouth FC (7 Viewers)
- Thread starter ecky
- Start date
Pardon me but I think you'll find we've signed several strikers since Wilsons departure...... do keep up dear.
Astute
Well-Known Member
Most of us didn't think it was a good idea at all.
Astute
Well-Known Member
Oh dear, dear.
So signing lots of poor strikers....mainly on loan......was replacing Wilson?
Skyblueweeman
Well-Known Member
Good point Otis, can't disagree with that.
Skyblueweeman
Well-Known Member
jimmyhillsfanclub
Well-Known Member
that's a different argument though fella.....
....Signing players is always a gamble......If the new strikers were banging them in for fun....everyone would be wanking themselves silly....but to date, they've, on the whole, provided a poor return.
Signing a lanky lower league journeyman whose second touch was often a tackle & pairing him with a lad who had yet to really step up from the academy was a bigger gamble last year......but hey, you win some, you lose some.
Skyblueweeman
Well-Known Member
Bradford must have the same bank manager then when they sold Nakhi Wells to Huddersfield last season as well then?? League One player, goal scoring record, sold for a reputed £3m to a Championship club.
Oh no hang on, it's ONLY Sisu's bank manager who could even dream something like that......
rupert_bear
Well-Known Member
If Joy Sepalla knew anything about football she would look at where the likes of Bournemouth and Southampton are presently and ask those charged with running our football club why aren't we somewhere near to where they are. The money pouring through both those clubs would mske sisu and more importantly their investors very happy.
jimmyhillsfanclub
Well-Known Member
Exactly...and Leon Clarke had never hit anywhere near the kind of form he did for us in over 10 years for trying.....win some, lose some.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Would they?
http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/27224806
http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/26813363
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
So if we kept Wilson we wouldn't be doing much better and Bournemouth wouldn't be doing much worse? And I thought I could spout shit on here
If you are still saying that it was a good deal you are either making excuses for those who make the decisions or making excuses for yourself because you said it was a good deal when he was sold. He is knocking them in for fun and setting other players up against much better players. Yet he wouldn't make much of a difference to our results this season?
Your the sad basket case as you seem content with all the goings on at the moment
How can you ever progress as a team when you just sell all your quality players year in year out?
You wonder why 8k only go to watch..
We regularly had 20,000 plus at the Ricoh when we first moved there.
I know you can't keep every player but we are where we are due to Sisu and their lack of ambition.
I tell you now Sisu are using city to offload all the debt and they will walk away..
Skyblueweeman
Well-Known Member
Jesus Christ ecky...no one's content but it's football for crying out loud. You're right, we did regularly get 20k at the Ricoh. Novelty factor. When we were regularly in the top flight, our attendances were 8-10k lower than that. It would be the same if we moved to a new stadium again...a novelty factor.
You could argue that we're in our current situation due to a number of factors but this has been done to death. You'd argue SISU. I'd argue SISU, Richardson and many others but let's not go there again.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
We were getting 20,000 when we sd mcsheffrey to a club in our league and replaced him with Kyle and Mckenzie.
History just repeating itself.
covmark
Well-Known Member
You really are pissing in the wind with the morons on here mate.
Covstu
Well-Known Member
FFS some on here are still acting as if we are a premier league club, the Wilson deal was inevitable and personally thought £3M was a decent amount. The amount of League One players poached by higher leagues season in season out is ongoing and clubs cannot stand in the way of a player getting a role in a higher league and a better salary. Its a shame we cannot keep these players but FFS we have been selling our best players since before i was born so why are people expecting us to change now when we are at our lowest eb since i can remember.
Its shit where we currently are but i think people need to wake up and realise that we are no longer a prem club or even a championship club and cannot expect us to retain a hot prospect like Wilson.
Its shit where we currently are but i think people need to wake up and realise that we are no longer a prem club or even a championship club and cannot expect us to retain a hot prospect like Wilson.
mds
Well-Known Member
Another short sighted thread about everyday football happenings like its only ever us.
Doubt it, but im sure they had a bonus or two from Man U.
The lack of ambition at this club is truly atrocious. Its always been our Achilles heel but now we're scraping the bottom of the barrel! When the Villa were our nemesis year after year we talked of survival ,they , on the other hand were not content with being out of the top ten . There is nothing wrong in yearning to be in the top flight and talking likewise but to actively support the selling of your best player in return for a few loans is weak
jimmyhillsfanclub
Well-Known Member
Horseshit.
No-one is "actively supporting" the sale of key players......
...it just happens that some of us live in the real world & accept that the sale of players to clubs higher up the pyramid is, & always has been, the norm.
All together now....sing along......"Cov do it, Brum do it, even man utd scum do it.....lets do it.....lets sell all our players"
SISU have shafted the club at every opportunity for about 4 years now. The worst example though had to be selling your leading goalscorer in the January when you were already fighting relegation. They'll do it every chance they can in the future too.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Lets compare shall we:
Coventry City - 19th in League 1, owe our owners £44.72m, 2013 accounts show £7.16m loss, don't own our ground but own Ryton.
Southampton - 2nd in the Premier League, owe their owners £32.4m, 2013 accounts show £7.1m loss (excluding transfer fees £8.7m profit), own their own ground and new £30m training centre. Note: have made about £35m profit from transfers over the summer.
Bournemouth - 1st in the Championship, owe their owners £16.2m, 2013 accounts show £15.3m loss (can't find any amount excluding transfer fees but I can see reports saying a large investment was made into training facilities), own their own ground and training centre.
Which club do you think is in the worst position out of those? If either Southampton's or Bournemouth's owners were to sell up there's a good chance they will at least get their money back. Depending on how they are run from the point of the these accounts its also possible for both to run profitably in the future.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Us obviously. Never said we weren't. However, the point was made that Bournemouth and Southampton's owners were raking it in. They clearly aren't and are having to throw money to stay where they are.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Perhaps that the difference between a club regularly getting crowds of 15-16k in the PL at highfield road with one getting 34-36k at villa park.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Astute
Well-Known Member
Would you like to check your fact of the day?
Astute
Well-Known Member
Us obviously. Never said we weren't. However, the point was made that Bournemouth and Southampton's owners were raking it in. They clearly aren't and are having to throw money to stay where they are.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Southampton sold nearly their whole first team. They replaced them and are now doing fantastic this season. And they spent less than they brought in. We sold our strikers. We didn't replace them. We are doing shit.
Perhaps that the difference between a club regularly getting crowds of 15-16k in the PL at highfield road with one getting 34-36k at villa park.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I think its been said before -- sucess on the pitch leads to bigger crowd ,leads to higher gate , and on to more income . If while trying to achieve this you sell your best players your , for want of a better word Fu@ked. Ambition is the key to it all . If SISU dont show any ,at least we can. I still think we could fill the stadium with a good side
LJC_CCFC
Member
Still think that we have a good squad (if not a bit of a risky one with the loans). The main problem has been the formation (5-3-2), we couldn't score, we didn't create and many blamed the squad. We change up to 4-4-2 and we've beaten Peterborough and drawn with Orient scoring 5 in the process. I could never say a Pressley team will be defensively solid, but watch us take off and replicate the first part of last seasons form in the 4-4-2.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
Stupid comment....all I am saying is that we would have scored more goals definitely, so we would have had more chance of winning and yes who is to say if we had scored first in some of those close games and Draws that we would then not have gone on to win. So you see it doesn't take 2 goals.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
But we had an 8 match unbeaten run when Reda was playing using 5-3-2, don't get me wrong I think it is shit to watch but it does work sometimes.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Of course but also some club are bigger than others, and have bigger fan bases. Villa are and were a bigger club than us.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Quite, you have to show some ambition at some point and with a club like Coventry with the potential support we could generate if we had a modicum of success, you have to give it a go at some point. SISU did throw some money at it 5/6 years ago but the cash was largely wasted and the wages paid were ridiculous to average players. That experience I suppose has dulled the appetite for 'taking a punt'.
LJC_CCFC
Member
Yeah there is certainly a time and a place for it, but from MK onwards we were dreadful playing it. Both the Posh and Orient games reminded me of the first part of last year, we can only hope the defence (REDA) can hold stronger than last year.