maybe if people actually listened to other peoples arguments rather than dismissing it out of hand as "but but but" and then a few days later repeating the same silly accusations or misrepresentations of peoples feelings. Then this forum would be a nicer place to be instead of heading towards being the next gmk.
Wasps are trying to build a longterm fanbase with free tickets, sisu in at a short term temporary northampton were not trying to do this, they were trying to prevent an embarrassing ghost town (with very limited success).
why is it that you are incapable of looking at a situation on it's own merits and come to a reasoned conclusion. This might sound harsh but this is at least the 3rd time I've seen you post a comment like this on this issue, each time you are responded to with a reasoned argument but then you do it again.
In fairness Noggin, it is just as reasonable to point out that it will be embarassing for Wasps (and CCC) to turn out in front of the kind of attendance they've traditionally had at Wycombe (6,000 - 7,000), at the Ricoh. The ghost town scenario, if you will.
It's not unreasonable to point out that giving away thousands of tickets might be as much about that as it is about marketing. Long term, giving this many tickets away has to impact how many paying customers you're going to draw in - so it's hard to think it's sustainable. Why as a casual supporter would I pay for anything that I can likely pick up for free?
And it does of course reinforce the point that rugby isn't a game that other than in a very few places gets anything like football levels of attendances.
Is that a reasoned enough argument for you? Just because people don't agree with you doesn't mean that they are unreasonable or wrong.