Really? Richardson only came on board to Wasps in 2013... interesting well known fact there.
Where do I say Richardson?
Really? Richardson only came on board to Wasps in 2013... interesting well known fact there.
"...it is a well known fact WASPS were talking to ACL ( therefore CCC & Higgs ) in 2011"
Oh, really? In 2011, Wasps were fully committed to the Booker Sports Village project. They'd spent a lot of money on it, and had received the backing of Wycombe District Council.
The council then had a change of leadership, and did a U-turn, late in 2011. The next plan involved the club being bought by the owner of Barnet FC. That deal fell through at the 11th hour, in April 2012.
In view of those established facts, suggestions that 'it's a well-known fact' that talks about the Ricoh were being held in 2011 are complete and utter nonsense.[/Q
"...it is a well known fact WASPS were talking to ACL ( therefore CCC & Higgs ) in 2011"
Oh, really? In 2011, Wasps were fully committed to the Booker Sports Village project. They'd spent a lot of money on it, and had received the backing of Wycombe District Council.
The council then had a change of leadership, and did a U-turn, late in 2011. The next plan involved the club being bought by the owner of Barnet FC. That deal fell through at the 11th hour, in April 2012.
In view of those established facts, suggestions that 'it's a well-known fact' that talks about the Ricoh were being held in 2011 are complete and utter nonsense.[/Q
Perhaps I move in more informed circles!
Richardson is the primary shareholder in MGI, so if he doesn't own Wasps directly, he owns it through MGI anyway.
Wasps will probably want a pitch with shorter grass to allow for a better running game, we've got some of the quickest players in the premiership and will want to be using them.
I think there is the problem, how long could ccc wait? .
We were told by Ann that ACL were doing well, so why couldn't they wait until they COULD negotiate with SISU or even until SISU had left? After all their decision means that a team from 85 miles away now has control of the Ricoh for 250 years. Surely, one or even five years of patience would ultimately have benefited OUR team. The city's team.
"the club would only return to the Ricoh if negotiations over arena ownership were re-opened by the council" looks like an invitation to me, as well...
I think what it is Torch, is that the council simply did not believe that Sisu would spend the next 2-4 years not trying to distress them further. They were still appealing the JR decision after all, and this allied to a third of the councils budget being slashed due to Tory austerity cuts dictated it was a risk they were not prepared to take.We were told by Ann that ACL were doing well, so why couldn't they wait until they COULD negotiate with SISU or even until SISU had left? After all their decision means that a team from 85 miles away now has control of the Ricoh for 250 years. Surely, one or even five years of patience would ultimately have benefited OUR team. The city's team.
What absolute tosh. Other than the loan (which they will earn interest on) no tax payers money was used to fund ACL. In fact ACL told the JR that ACL was flourishing without the club.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Then you fucking cut it, with under soil heating and modern working practices grass can be made to grow easily 6 inches overnightYes I have seen top class Rugby Union at Twickenham and elsewhere. The pitch looks nice and green and if you get up close about 6 inches in length. You couldn't play football on that. Of course you can play Rugby Union on a good surface but it's not that critical like it is for football.
Point taken and bad wording from my side where i was not clear in my point, I was referring to the Legal costs that were building for the JR and beyond. Those costs were reported close to £500K and only had the prospect of Going up.
Because of funding from central Govt , There will be 1,000 job cuts, no lollypop ladies for the children to go to school etc.. . That is where I was indicating CCC should be focussing. ALC was not filling that hole with any dividend. Interest payment on the mortgage may have offset it a little but I could not defend a council who put public money into this when other basic services were being starved of money.
We were told by Ann that ACL were doing well, so why couldn't they wait until they COULD negotiate with SISU or even until SISU had left? After all their decision means that a team from 85 miles away now has control of the Ricoh for 250 years. Surely, one or even five years of patience would ultimately have benefited OUR team. The city's team.
So what if SISI are serious about building the stadium of Joy and CCC turned Wasps down flat not believing that SISU will build and in the hope that either SISU will seriously come to the table or new owners will do a deal, as the latter doesn't happen the Ricoh becomes the white elephant some on here have been saying all along it already apparently is and becomes deserted and loss making and then it comes to light that CCC had a buyer but they misjudged what SISU were actually going to do and turned it down? What do you think the Coventry Tax payer would have to say about that?
SISU over played their hand and got burnt, its as simple as that. CCC saw a confirmed route out of this mess and took it. Thats called cause and effect.
Sorry NW, looks nothing like an invitation to me. AL's deadline had passed without any approach from SISU. It's purely posturing. Maybe, just maybe, they could have picked up the phone earlier, said they were dropping the unencumbered aspect, but wanted a 250 year lease.... Who knows, that may have worked....
I think what it is Torch, is that the council simply did not believe that Sisu would spend the next 2-4 years not trying to distress them further. They were still appealing the JR decision after all, and this allied to a third of the councils budget being slashed due to Tory austerity cuts dictated it was a risk they were not prepared to take.
Point taken and bad wording from my side where i was not clear in my point, I was referring to the Legal costs that were building for the JR and beyond. Those costs were reported close to £500K and only had the prospect of Going up.
Because of funding from central Govt , There will be 1,000 job cuts, no lollypop ladies for the children to go to school etc.. . That is where I was indicating CCC should be focussing. ALC was not filling that hole with any dividend. Interest payment on the mortgage may have offset it a little but I could not defend a council who put public money into this when other basic services were being starved of money.
Your lad off school today??The problem is everyone is right. CCC should have held on until SISU either stopped all the litigation or were ready to negotiate. But what was the risk of being left with the 'white elephant' that some were going on about as well as the time and money wasted?
Both sides are at fault here. SISU's plan worked on CCC getting rid of the arena on the cheap. But they failed to consider that someone else might be interested. And it is our football club and ourselves who are left to suffer. This is why I am pissed off with CCC for letting the arena go to Wasps but at the same time understand why it was done.
Then you fucking cut it, with under soil heating and modern working practices grass can be made to grow easily 6 inches overnight
"Perhaps I move in more informed circles!"
Like the Coventry & District Home for the Bewildered? Or the Warwickshire branch of The Friends of Joan of Arc?
No, we need Neutral Fan to clarify. Only he's got his daily mention of MGI in the bag so he wont be back until tomorrow
Rob Smith said:With regard to the financial set up of Wasps we simply do not know any or hardly any of the details. What we do know is Wasps RFC are the trading company, have bought the leasehold, most likely pay rent to CCC on the freehold, own 50% or 100% of ACL the operating company. Wasps are 100% owned by Canmango Ltd a holding Company registered in London, largest shareholder David Thorne. Canmango Ltd are 100% owned by Moonstone Ltd who shares are 100% owned by MGI Fiduciary Services in which Derek Richardson is the primary shareholder. Both Moonstone Ltd and MGI are Malta registered companies, so quite difficult to establish details.The funding for the purchase will have come down from these Companies and will be presented as loans in the Wasps accounts.
What the hell kind of shitty comment is that? Jealousy of landlords? What planet are you on? A planet where all people with property are fine upstanding citizens who are simp winning at capitalism while providing an excellent service for the poor ungrateful underclass who should be happy with the overpricing because, well that's just the market. And if your sick, disabled, work three jobs or lack the life skills in order to maintain a home, well that just makes you jealous of the hand that feeds you (at market value).
The feeling I get when I go to the Ricoh is that, in its emptiness for the last year, ACL have let it go. CCFC have been powerless to do anything about that and from the sounds of things, that is only set to continue.
Anne Lucas said no contact before July 2014 so clearly Eastwood is a liar isn't he Don?
No, she said that she became involved in July but that other council officers were talking to Wasps in the months prior to July.
Funny how you and Nick just make stuff up to paint Anne Lucas to be a liar but you never mention the far more damaging lies from SISU and their management team.
She has never said that - stop lying.
You are the liar, asshole.
Playing with words - SHE may have only met WASPS in July for the first time but it is a well known fact WASPS were talking to ACL ( therefore CCC & Higgs ) in 2011
So wasps looked at the Ricoh in December 2013.
Did SISU get given a deadline of Jan 14 to put in decent offer for ACL. Otherwise the council would be forced to consider alternatives options.
SISU let the deadline go and said we are building a new stadium, freehold or nothing?
No, she said that she became involved in July but that other council officers were talking to Wasps in the months prior to July.
Funny how you and Nick just make stuff up to paint Anne Lucas to be a liar but you never mention the far more damaging lies from SISU and their management team.
Interesting that Ann Lucas said today on the radio that Wasps made contact for the first time in July.
Moved is franchising. Franchising is moving. Dress it up however you want. It was wrong when SISU did it and it's doubly wrong for Wasps as it's permanent.
Wasps haven't had a permanent home in the professional era.