Grendel
Well-Known Member
The comparison is perfectly legitimate. You crusade for truth and transparency in all aspects of politics or you don't. Take your pick.
Sisu make official complaint over Coventry councillors' conduct (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter ccfc92
- Start date
The comparison is perfectly legitimate. You crusade for truth and transparency in all aspects of politics or you don't. Take your pick.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
The sale was open to other bidders. AL even said so on TV.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
AL said so. Lol.
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
I am not sure I ever declared that SISU were the only show in town? You could also argue that the council's refusal to lower the rent when requested by Paul Fletcher and others led directly to SISU's rent strike. I forget that for many though there is now no pre-SISU, and a myth has been created that we were well run before them and successful.
Are you having some sort of crisis? When have I alluded to the belief I am of superior intelligence? Granted, I will admit to winding up and ridiculing posters on a regular basis
but i'm not sure I have ever claimed to be intelligent or more intelligent than anyone else?Still, nothing like a bit of diversion.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Well, whether you think it's funny or not she said it and then the council received the grand total of one bid and not from SISU either. It's like complaining you haven't won the lottery when you've never bought a ticket.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I am not sure I ever declared that SISU were the only show in town? You could also argue that the council's refusal to lower the rent when requested by Paul Fletcher and others led directly to SISU's rent strike. I forget that for many though there is now no pre-SISU, and a myth has been created that we were well run before them and successful.
Are you having some sort of crisis? When have I alluded to the belief I am of superior intelligence? Granted, I will admit to winding up and ridiculing posters on a regular basis
Still, nothing like a bit of diversion.
Maybe you did maybe you didn't but plenty were. The rent was ridiculous I'm never going to argue with that but the game changer was leaving the Ricoh, with or without the "we have moved on and are building a new" bullshit. It lost the club ALL control of the future of the Ricoh and returning on a game by game basis didn't change that either. Whether you like it or not or can accept it or not when SISU took the club away from the Ricoh it instantly put it on the open market and also made it more attractive as whoever took it on now had the opportunity to install themselves as the anchor tenant. I could see this possibility on day one when they started emptying the club shop. SISU for whatever ever reason didn't see this coming and by the time they did it was too late.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Why did they sell a company that only ever relied on Ccfc as 10% of its turnover and one that had a sound business plan that was never making a loss?
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Err. Because it was bullshit. Surely even you have worked that out?
The real question is why didn't SISU strike when the Iron was hot? If they were serious about paying anything regardless of how small that amount may or may not have been they should have started by the beginning of 2014 for a return for the 2014/15 season. Why didn't they? I know you think that SISU lost the JR on purpose (ha ha ha ha, still laughing at that one. Cheers) but I don't buy that for a moment. Personally, given the monumental way they lost I don't believe even they thought they would win. Either that or they've been greatly mislead by their legal advisors. Which can only lead you to one conclusion. They never thought it would get to court, they thought CCC would come running cap in hand begging for mercy. Didn't really work out for them did it? Oh well, if at first you don't succeed and all that. Everyone loves a chancer, err sorry a trier.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
Oh you mean that rent that Joy never knew we were paying for over a season.I am not sure I ever declared that SISU were the only show in town? You could also argue that the council's refusal to lower the rent when requested by Paul Fletcher and others led directly to SISU's rent strike. I forget that for many though there is now no pre-SISU, and a myth has been created that we were well run before them and successful.
Are you having some sort of crisis? When have I alluded to the belief I am of superior intelligence? Granted, I will admit to winding up and ridiculing posters on a regular basis
Still, nothing like a bit of diversion.
So they brought a football club without knowing all the facts.
I wonder why they would do that??
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Well you haven't. Anne said it - or does she only tell the truth on the TV?
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Seeing as I've just told you clearly I have. Do keep up if you can.
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
Don't be rude Tony, he is busy with his crusade for truth and transparency.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
The only day I have ever had to "keep up" on an intellectual level with Tony would have been the day of my birth.
Anne says the stadium is open to offers from anyone - Anne is telling Tony Truth
Anne says the Ricoh isn't losing money - Anne is telling Tony Bullshit
Utter nonsense.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
So when Tony Blair pledged to bring in a minimum wage and did he was telling the truth.
When Tony Blair said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction was he still telling the truth?
If you want transparency in politics you have to be prepared to accept that the same politician not only bullshits but also tells the truth at times.
Was AL bullshitting when she said that the council would listen to any genuine offer you have to say no. They received one offer, listened to it and then completed a deal. If only another party had have come in with a separate offer we might have been able to say otherwise. But that never happened. You seem to be having trouble admitting that, hence the bullshit merry go round your trying to get people on board.
Last edited:
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
Well it's certainly clear she invited offers, sadly there's no evidence of SISU submitting an offer.
She was slightly wrong on her figures wasn't she, maybe she meant to say if it wasn't for the £400k of legal fees that ACL have had to pay out, they were washing their face.
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
Something to do with Ray Ranson?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Which other party? Anne had already said hell would freeze over before ccfc would buy a share into the club.
Or was that another bit of Tony Bullshit as opposed to Tony Truth?
James Smith
Well-Known Member
In the same vein of people making iffy statements......Where are the new stadium plans/location etc. Tim? You've had nearly Two Years since the fans forum!
HE said she said again,, we have to get off this merry go round,, Sisu lost,, which means we lost.. FACT, sad but very simple to digest. Sisu brought this whole episode onto themselves and most know it, just don't like the CCC so fault must sit with them is not a good enough reason or the other way round...
TF, SW, Paul Clouting, Ken in mean come on these are people you would deal with,, simple answer is you cant... I mean Oyne sat in the ground for 6 moths before anyone knew he was the chairmen, since then SW and TF strolled in and what a pair they have turned out to be..The root cause is for all to see, reaction by the CCC is because of actions taken by the owners, not the other way round,, now does this mean CCC are great and never should be looked into ,, no.. But you can only kick an old dog so many times before he bites you on the arse,, and once he does that you have no other option or bridge to build...
Last edited:
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
So that was council policy was it? The council chamber voted on hell freezing over did it?
Why didn't SISU challenge them by putting in an offer? I would have backed SISU if they did and I'm sure you would have too. We never had that luxury though did we?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
I don't know what they voted on Tony as the council - which is elected to serve the public - hide behind a veil of secrecy.
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
They would have been presented with a decision on whether to accept the Wasps bid, or reject it and then wait for CCFC to move out into their new stadium.
So the prediction for the future would see an empty stadium with no client.
No brainer really.
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
They had already said the Higgs share was worth nothing but as they were a charity they would give them £2M
Grendel
Well-Known Member
On its own on a 43 year lease with zero controlling interest what was it worth?
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
They didn't put an offer in, and they said they wouldn't have done the deal that Wasps did, so it does seem rather a stretch to get to your guess.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
They also put in a bid for the Higgs half which would seem to suggest they would have purchased if offered the same deal as Wasps.
You know the Council 'offered' a longer lease to Wasps.....for fact? Might it have been during the 'negotiation' process, that WASPS 'requested' a longer lease to make it economically justifiable? Just asking, 'cos I don't know either......I wasn't there at the negotiations......but it sounds as if you were! So please tell, was it 'offered' or was it 'requested' or was it 'negotiated'?
Remember, at this point CCFC/SISU/OTIUM had already stated many times that they were NOT interested in the Ricoh, as they had their sights set elsewhere. That only left ONE player in town......the WASPS.
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
The offer that neither party wanted to continue with. I'm not convinced by that argument, especially as they didn't put an offer in later, and they have said they wouldn't have done the deal.
edit: sorry I see you mean the later offer when wasps came in. The deal was already done, they should have made a huge offer to highlight the ridiculousness of that process. They also don't appear to have made the offer from the Company that may have had the right to make the offer, so maybe it was a non offer anyway.
Last edited:
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
They did put a bid in with conditions. Higgs took the bid of the same amount with no conditions, a stand named after them which will accumulate 50p a seat.
No brainer really.
Ian1779
Well-Known Member
Wasps had a fucking great big condition in their bid.... called a veto if they didn't choose their bid.
Nick
Administrator
How do you know all of the conditions or not?
Nick
Administrator
Reminds me of the lad in the nightclub trying it on with a girl and then when turned down saying "Ugly anyway".
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
Were you that lad Nick?