Search results

What about the impact on innocent civilians who do not wish to live under Putin's rule. How does that work under your process of appeasement (let's call it for what it is, eh).

For clarity, that's my attempt at an unfunny joke. @Ashdown is spot on, imho...

Bollocks! 😁

Which would seem to be a pretty good reason for banning bump stocks, to me. Pity the republicans don't agree...

In fairness to Starmer, I think he probably does like the game, as opposed to it being purely a man-of-the-people electoral device. Until we've got a PM who is not only a Cov fan, but can immediately name the unused CCFC sub from the 87 final, I won't be happy regardless. No bandwagon jumpers. 😁

You won't be laughing when Forest Green Rovers mysteriously appear in the Premier League fixtures next year. The leftie woke environmentalist tentacles' reach, is long. 😁

Fair enough, appreciate the honesty. I am 100% with you on the cronyism thing. If Starmer is serious about cleaning up politics then everything has to be completely open and above board. I think it's fair enough to build solar etc. if that's your stated policy, but the actual tendering process...

I'm no expert on this, but I think the fact that you're probably about to die would impact most untrained shooter's fine motor control. And probably a lot of well-trained ones too. Anyway, AR-15, the reports are saying. I'm guessing he didn't have the Republican approved bump stock fitted, or...

Indeed, and the biggest risk to food security is, arguably, climate change.

If you're a Tory supporter, then I think the cronyism argument isn't somewhere you'd really want to go. 😁 Is there any evidence that someone in the Labour party is making money out of this policy or indeed doing it for that reason? As for how much land, I don't know, but I think that all of...

Hmm. So these NatCs (couldn't make it up!) are presumably against, Sunday opening, capital punishment, adultery, lying, and stealing. They've not really been following what their leaders and donors have been up to or asking for, presumably.

I'm sure they're not, but the article is in a farming magazine. I'm not exactly a Blairite. I was looking for something with a bit of data about food security versus solar use. If you've got some alternate research that suggests the figures are different, then get it out there. Currently the...

In the spirit of (hopefully) polite debate, I did a bit of digging on this. The suggestion that even these large solar developments are a threat to UK food security, doesn't seem to be backed by evidence. A quote from an article linked to below... "Solar panels cover an estimated 0.1% of the...

I don't see many people saying it's right. Is it unfair to point out though, that Trump seems to struggle to just say "that's wrong" - when the violence or threats are against his opponents?

What's that line about wrestling with pigs? You both get dirty but the pig enjoys it? I'm getting that vibe here. Best to ignore the idiots, I guess..

What on you warbling on about ? Go lie down baby, that dribbling has made your bib all wet.

Prosecutorial overreach? Did you see the pictures. Did you think you they were there for a nice day out? Don't know about me having a cup of tea mate, I think you need to get back on the meds - you're delusional.

Outstanding. Normally it takes a paragraph of wittering, or at least a few sentences of incoherence, to expose oneself as a complete idiot. You've done it in twelve words. Kudos.

Nothing justifies violence, but the hypocrisy by Trump supporters here and elsewhere is breathtaking. Here's Trump mocking the victim of a hammer attack (on the family of a political rival)...

Hmm. Russia is spending almost 20% of GDP on the war, there's a huge labour shortage, high inflation, and an interest rate of 16%. There's no way that Russia on its own comes out financially on top here if that's what you're suggesting, this war will have done long term damage to the Russian...