Search results

Fuck me, I thought the CT and Observer were embarrassing - this is another level. Makes Cov's local rags look like the Wall Street Journal.

In terms of what happens next, one thing's for sure...and that's nothing's for sure!

Why not?

But there might be a long wait before that happens i.e. to get a new civil claim prepared. In the meantime there would be no legal stuff ongoing which could hinder Boddy and Eastwood from doing a deal.

Has it been suggested they will try escalating to the ECJ? They weren't allowed to do so for JR1....

Yeah. If he was good enough to do so he would have got past Ryan Haynes. The fact that he wasn't able to do so tells you a lot about him, either in terms of his game or his attitude.

My feelings exactly. It's not a pain free option to take CCFC out of Cov, it would cost Sisu a fortune as well as hitting Wasps on the pocket, so the best bet now is to suck up the decision, play nice, wait for Wasps to go under and then pick up the Ricoh on the cheap as part of the insolvency...

Call it "legal fatigue". Many including me, who once followed this closely, are long past bored of the whole repetitive saga and just want to fast forward to the end.

I think that there is some doubt that JR2 is indeed stone dead. Jr1 was definitively over when things got to this point but for some reason now the Euro courts are being mentioned. So perhaps without clarification from Sisu it's not clear that this particular set of legals is finished. Tbf I...

What kind of odds could you get on us beating Sunderland in the play-off final this season??

I still have a sneaky feeling that if we're in with a shout on the final day then we might just make it...

Nah that was when the judge went to Crawley away

Previous form / my prediction....

"SISU Capital notes the decision today by the Supreme Court and will not be commenting further at this time."

Dale Evans will lend him a quid.

That's two choices. Ricoh.

Looking forward to the Sunderland rematch when they inevitably mess up the play-offs.

I don't think that's what thy mean. They mean that the appeal, if heard, would be to overturn a judge's decision. The original decision was based on the judge's interpretation of the law, but if this interpretation was faulty then as a matter of public importance then the judgement should be...

Is this deffo the end of JR2? The identical decision (not to hear an appeal) by the Supreme court ended JR1. But could the CT story implies SISU could appeal to the EU courts....that wasn't the case last time, but could it be the case now (and, if so, why?)

There is no verdict because they have simply declined to hear the appeal. The point of an appeal is that it asks a higher authority to look again at a judgment made further down the chain (in the high court, in this case) and there has to be a valid point of law i.e. that the judge made an error...