Search results

No, I mean those on here. You've raised issue with those "being offended on behalf of women", but what are your thoughts on those who are suggesting women should just put up with such actions?

Yes

Maybe you could get a women to explain it to you?

And your thoughts on those who believe they're entitled to decide what women should put up?

What are you on about? The link you're trying to present simply doesn't exist. The fact you've not directly subjected to something doesn't mean you can't form the opinion that you wouldn't want to be - it doesn't mean you're "pissed off" for not being subjected to such actions.

The fact you acknowledge it still happens demonstrates the situation is an ongoing one. The fact you think such actions are acceptable doesn't mean women should - that's the point you seem to be missing.

So how does builders being disciplined for it mean it's outlawed? You're think only builders do it? Also who, aside from you, has mentioned 'most women' being subjected to such behaviour? The fact you've not observed something taking place doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

And on what basis, information and/or evidence have you based this claim?

I am.

Try actually reading what I said before asking questions.

covmark and Astute, you're talking absolute drivel. The mere fact you believe women are all fair game and should just put up with it is exactly the problem. It's not for you to decide what other people should put up with or find acceptable.

Boris Johnson as Foreign Secretary!

To deter a tyrannical government, prevent slave revolts and repel invasion - unfortunately the twitchy paranoia has moved from muskets to high power assault rifles!

Obourne out - Hammond in

"COVENTRY City say they are still seeking further information on whether they can retain their ‘lifeblood’ youth academy and its prized elite status if rugby club Wasps move in to its Coventry base. Sky Blues managing director Chris Anderson said they are still awaiting clarity from parties...

By way of update I've had no reply, or even acknowledgement of my email, from Armstrong, Seppala or Anderson despite follow up emails requesting such responses.

I've had the following reply from Sport England - "Thank you for your email. Sport England are aware of the issues at the Alan Higgs Centre and will be providing a formal response to Coventry City Council in due course. Kind regards James"

My bad, the 'and' should read 'to'.

? The email is to the council about the current setup at Higgs, so not sure how that's inaccurate info being given out by the council.