Search results

Yes the advice in the articles say unless you absolutely have to don't communicate with the person suing you. Sometimes you have to as in if you need each other's business. (Examples Dave gave earlier) Or in the case of CCC they would have a legal duty to communicate about certain things such...

What I find amazing. Is all these people who have wanted any other organisation to bend over backwards as long as it's for the good of CCFC. They actively wanted a children's charity to be put under financial pressure. They wanted a business half owned by CCC half owned by a charity to go bust...

Maybe you have to and you or they need the business. CCC don't. SISU do. So CCC are wiser doing the minimum that have to.

What news?

Think it is quite standard practice if someone is suing you in business. You don't talk to them unless you really have to. Especially if they need you more than you need them. Then you would be really dumb if you did.

Not sure if this is in here already somewhere, good statement .... Sky Blue Trust - Jaw Jaw Not War War – Stop Playing Games With Our Club’s Future

There was all this pressure first time round as well. Turns out it was just so people could try and save wasting time and money on something pointless.

To me it seemed quite clear during JR1 that the council had been advised not to talk to SISU.

You're Being Sued: A Guide to Handling a Business Lawsuit DO NOT: Communicate directly with the plaintiff Many of our expert sources reminded business owners that anything they say regarding the lawsuit can be used against them. For this reason, you should not attempt to contact the plaintiff...

P I am not using Wembley as a barometer. I am using last season as a barometer in which a 12k stadium would have been too small. That was with a mild sniff of success. So unless our owners don't plan on having any future success 12k is too small. Grendel is right there is no debate.

Our average attendance last year was over 12k and for one match we got 17k. That was with a tiny wiff of success. If the owners had genuine ambitions of a return to the championship. You would get planning permission for 25k agreed from the off, to ensure it is possible. Even if you actually...

So if my understanding correct. The observer said mediation has already started. Their explanation of this is that CCFC have participated in this mediation process by making these three requirements. “Putting Coventry City front and centre-stage in the community.” A future stadium solution...

Surely the observer should be asking the CET along as well. SISU have fallen out with them as well. There are some people at work who fall out with people and mediation is required. In the end they usually move to another department. Then all of a sudden a load more people who have never had...

No the council have been quite clear on their stance all the way along. They will not stand in the way of anything. They will do the job they have to do. If SISU want them to do above and beyond their legal requirements and actively push the boat out and help SISU. Then SISU need to stop suing...

And the pitch, 3 football teams and two egg shaped ball teams. Then renting it to the local community as well. It would need to be one hell of a pitch if it isn't artificial.

Yes I recall that one. To me that just confirms Cov Utd would still be there if CCFC came. That fits better with his quote above that the bears, the ladies team and Cov Utd are at the Butts long term.

presumably not this quote.... “This is not short term, it is all part of our long term strategy and we feel it ticks all sorts of boxes and hopefully all clubs will prosper.”

Unfortunately I think you are both right. Its SISU's and Mr Fishers trademark standard negotiating stance. Unfortunately like the Council were misjudged on how they would respond to such negotiating tactics. The same is happening again with Wasps. They won't back down either. CCFC will end up...

I didn't say she should step down she should step away. What is Dermot Coleman's view on CCFC. We don't know because he stays out of it. Joy should now do the same and allow two new people who can build relationships. However this could only happen in the back of dropping the legal action. I...

A ladies team, you sexist bugger! Kicking the others out doesn't really strike well with whole community ethos idea. I can't see that happening.