Search results

Just gone through this thread and there are some interesting points made by OSB58 regarding the ability of ACL to be able to provide any revenues to the shareholders until the loan / debt is fully paid even if CCFC were to own 50% of it.

I agree its not easy but even OSB58 when looking at the accounts indicated that ACL was not being promoted as much as it should be with a passive approach. The new Regime at ACL have appointed an events specialist to push this so they are not taking it lightly. The Ricoh is far more...

I can see what you are saying but.... he is not likely to and is on the record that he is not calling it in (in the accounts). The accounts reflect business at Adams Park not at the Ricoh. ACL lost 400k when CCFC did not pay any rent. I think in their entire history ACL lost money only in 2...

No if they are smart they will sweat the asset more... more concerts, exhibitions etc... sponsorship and TV cash and don't forget the naming rights of the stadium to possibly JLR Beer and Pies are nice but they need to be sold on the big concert days rather than the 3 hrs round the football.

In theory nothing is there to stop him taking his money but why would he do that? he is behind WASPS and they are running the show so infect he already has it.

Yes they have a sugar Daddy that has made a significant investment at the front end of a business plan they are currently executing. These figures reflect the old regime and earning so its difficult to make a call as to what they really mean in the current context. If they are succeeding yow...

This alarms me as the initial criteria could well exclude the best man for the job. Take Mowbray every management appointment has been to a club recently relegated from the pre league so a good squad and money to spend and only 51% at Celtic where they only expect to lose 2 games a season...

Understand what you are saying but isn't JR1 still under appeal so until that's cleared up its difficult if not impossible to move into the second and pending enquiry? SISU through litigation have effectively stopped any public review process

Les Ried certainly swallowed Timmys we have met with Rugby council speech as it was central in his article about there being no home for CCFC in Cov. You would have thought that with his award winning investigative journalist senses he would have sussed it out. Don't think you can rely on him...

its all gone down the pan as far as SISU's concerned

Les Ried Reported it when trying to bash CCC http://www.coventryobserver.co.uk/2015/02/21/news-No-site-in-Coventry-for-Sky-Blues-stadium-claims-councillor-125594.html

Are you suggesting that RBC are lying in response to a FOI request?

Come on CET.....follow this up....openly lying to supporters groups , having it recorded in the minutes and released in the public domain? How can you let them get away with this without challenging them?

Why not? He obviously cares about the club and has an opinion do we all have to have the same point of view in order to post on here?

After Sheffield RFC posted "its not Pressley its the players" on Monday SISU said "its not the players its Pressley" Just who is it RFC... there is one common thread to all this SISU. The Government of this country and even the US President only get 5 years to achieve their objectives before...

Mark Warburton...... he could look after the money side too

nonsense. You get equity in a business by buying in.

There was no reason the last two times either.... its a legal requirement

If not wouldn't that be a benefit in kind and taxable? But is describing a free season ticket for Coventry a benefit stretching the point somewhat?

The Otium accounts are due on the 28th of this month should make for interesting reading