Search results

Have to agree. Can’t help but think one crucial signing this window could bring the best out of the players around them. I don’t think this Chelsea kid is that player.

No, nothing reliable. BTA has come from Sky

Something like this in possession: MVE Thomas Kitching Sheaf Dasilva Sakamoto Allen Rudoni Wright Simms

He would suit a Rico Lewis style step into midfield. He’s very tidy on the ball but his lack of mobility would mean we’d struggle in transition. Keeping with the Man City comparison, I would much prefer MVE playing a Kyle Walker (not this season) role ie) staying in the back 3 in possession and...

He’s not training for Sphinx he’s training at Sphinx in those 1 on 1 sessions

He’s been training at Sphinx, guessing that’s why this has cropped up

Hypothetically if Saddle is correct and it’s Lati, Bta out with Rak Sakyi in. Who plays cb when Thomas is injured? If we wanted to play a back 5 as we have been we’d have no back up cb

I’d be inclined to agree but it would be an easy out for him to say that BTA doesn’t fit with the new manager’s plans and had to be let go. Still I’m with you I think he’ll stay

If we intend to invest the time into Bassette, it would make sense to accept the offer however, if both him and Lati go we will need a cb, rb, cm and a forward of some sort in January. Seems like an awful lot to do.

Would have to agree with this strategy. I’d love us to focus on signing either a very good cm or cb that will improve us next season. Feel like that would help bring out the best in our current players.

I would actually agree with King on avoiding loans this window. Needs to change in the summer though

At very worst it looks like we could break even on the current bunch. I’m more concerned about where we go in the summer if, MVE, Sheaf, Wright leave.

Do you not find it weird they would post him voluntarily though? Or would the admin not be aware of any ongoing negotiations anyway? Does seem odd for the club to say he’s ill and can’t attend an event but then voluntarily show he isn’t ill!

Do you not find it weird they would post him voluntarily though? Or would the admin not be aware of any ongoing negotiations anyway? Does seem odd for the club to say he’s ill and can’t attend an event but then voluntarily show he isn’t ill!

I’d be disappointed to see him go. Young, versatile and is seemingly asked to play in a different role week to week. If he does go, we’d need a cb and a rb to replace him. I don’t know if the plan is for Burroughs to be the back up rb. If not, I think it leaves us too much to do in January...

I’ve grown out of all that. You may have noticed all my posts in the last year or so have been strictly football

I think a couple of the admin have a personal problem with me. I will happily apologise to them and resolve it through pm’s if possible.

Correct, unsure why the the last one was banned

Why am I banned for posting genuine football discussions yet this poster just posts constant insults and remains?

Slightly confused why you would post this on here as you attempted to ridicule the forum during the podcast. Anyway I have a few points. You say it wasn’t Doug King and Austin who prevented loan signings and the signing of ‘over 30’s’ as you put it. You say it’s just conjecture made up on...