Search results

Indeed but his other crosses were poor.

I think that’s the main difference rather than individual players rotating.

He had a good game I wouldn’t say great. Defended well but didn’t use the ball well, a lot of stray passes etc.

Yes but I think they’ll then flog the club to MA cheap after Jan. They will get more in total selling off in bits, with inflated Jam transfer window prices, than they would selling as a whole to Ashley.

But also it will drive the price up. He will want to drive it down and SISU will want guaranteed return. I think they will look to offload a few players in Jan. Easier money that negotiating with MA.

Indeed. It is insane that somebody in such a position be involved in any local enterprise. Surely the whole idea is you are compensated to be a neutral advisor/manager type not to bend over backwards to give grants and development opportunities to a business you are involved with?

It’s surely a problem if there is a conflict of interest as an unelected official is essentially steering the council, deciding what ideas are put to them, and controlling the narrative.

Best for quality of life and keeping sane, IMO. I’ll be on this thread hours every day.

Can’t blame you after all this talk of chocolate

Is the effect still the same though, it’s listed as an investment of x million in CCFC generating x amount of interest per year?

I guess those loses show up as debtors on SISUs accounts and so effectively an asset? Would that be why they’d manufacture “losses” and hang around, it inflates their balance sheet? Or have I got that all wrong…

If that’s the case we will soon hear about I’m sure.

Pretty straight forward fella, Bounty are being taken out of Celebrations for a trial period. The shortage will be made up with an equal distribution of the other confectionary. The arguments are over whether or not Bounty are a good sweet, which is why the thread is so long. Do keep up.

Bas Basically most of them want to be convenient for them as individuals with zero other considerations…I thought us football fans were supposed to be the stupid ones!

Yeah but we haven’t got any money so presumably a potential future owner is covering it really.

They’re still a stakeholder and everyone has been badgering them asking them if they will do what they can to ensure games stay on, haven’t they?

It’s a good palette cleanser. Removing it is like having steak and chips without a side salad or something. Great in theory but a bit overindulgent.

Didn’t Duggins admit there was a meeting planned but said it wasn’t needed in the end?

That could be a good shout

Interest from loans?