21/22 Summer transfer mega-thread (8 Viewers)
- Thread starter Ccfcisparks
- Start date
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Good point forgot it was on profit.
SkyblueDad
Well-Known Member
I think Premier clubs do similar deals when selling players down the pyramid
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
Imagine if our third hand sell on on Madderz10 allowed us to sign Ostigard 
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Imagine if our third hand sell on on Madderz10 allowed us to sign Ostigard
We could skip that and just get Maddison to pay it directly he’s that loaded
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
QUOTE="slowpoke, post: 2322024, member: 8018"]
I’m sure I have read somewhere it is 15% but is off the profit so you have to take off what Leicester paid Norwich which I think was £20million so doing the maths it looks to me to be about £900k.
Nice little earner
[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure on this.
It will have been 15% on profit Norwich made for sure. I'm not sure you can insert clauses on all future profits can you? Sure Norwich will get a cut from Foxes on this deal, I just don't see how the levy can carry forward infinitely?
I would happily be wrong and give a hand rolled Cuban to the person who negotiated it.
I’m sure I have read somewhere it is 15% but is off the profit so you have to take off what Leicester paid Norwich which I think was £20million so doing the maths it looks to me to be about £900k.
Nice little earner
[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure on this.
It will have been 15% on profit Norwich made for sure. I'm not sure you can insert clauses on all future profits can you? Sure Norwich will get a cut from Foxes on this deal, I just don't see how the levy can carry forward infinitely?
I would happily be wrong and give a hand rolled Cuban to the person who negotiated it.
skyblueelephant76
Well-Known Member
Jamie Paterson is on trial at Middlesbrough
Happy_Martian
Well-Known Member
Anyone decrying the Maddison to Norwich deal is deluding only themselves. We have always been and will continue to be a selling club. It's the ability we have of nurturing good youth talent and selling for a small profit but building in decent sell-ons that have allowed us to run for as long as we have.
Tommo1993
Well-Known Member
Simple, highest bidder wins. But that move closer to home he wanted didn’t happen.
Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
If we offered him a contract and Middlesbrough offered him a trial, surely he would rather take the contract than perform the trial. Surprised by him being on trial considering we apparently offered him good terms but he wanted first team. If he's on trial that would suggest hes not gonna be first choice at Middlesbrough.
Skyblue_CP
Well-Known Member
Patterson won't be signing for us now, that's dead in the water, needed 1 more attacking midfielder to take some work load off O'Hare and we got Bright. If he turned us down originally in favour of a trial, good luck to him.
KenilworthSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
Not so sure. I suspect Arsenal will be more willing to spend this summer as they've probably realised that a big spend is needed as they're fast becoming a mid-table team which just won't wash with Kroenke regardless of how frugal he traditionally is.
They've also made a number of players up for grabs which should generate a bit of cash to reinvest.
KenilworthSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
Granted he'd be a solid signing but for the wages he'd likely demand I question whether bringing him in would be a wise use of resources.
cooperskyblue
Well-Known Member
I also wonder whether that Bright approaching us or becoming available actually was more appealing to MR than Paterson. Like Bright fits our model and we all agree has exceptional talent and could make us a good profit in the future.
I Would have liked Paterson, personally for the 'Cov City Fan' coming home factor, but in a way I think the magic of Bright is in a way more exciting.
Saddlebrains
Well-Known Member
All gone a bit quiet hasnt it
What we saying then, all agreed on 2 CB's, 1LWB, 1CM?
What we saying then, all agreed on 2 CB's, 1LWB, 1CM?
PUSB-We_are_going_up
Well-Known Member
2 players for every position can’t have being battered 4-0 every week, honestly refund every signing
TomS91
Well-Known Member
I would like a pacy striker on loan too but that is almost certainly wishful thinking.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Telegraph seems to be implying 1 CB and 2 LWBs and a CM.
I won’t say what I want for fear of awakening the beast.
Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
Well done, you are yet to mention him today. You are doing well.
vow
Well-Known Member
Nice to see someone else gets an erection chatting about incoming transfers....
Saddlebrains
Well-Known Member
Genuine question,
Why is everyone happy for 1cb?
Weve got to replace Osti for a start, then were still relying on 1 of Fadz and Hyam again imn the back 3.
For me its 2CB more of a need than 2 LWB
Why is everyone happy for 1cb?
Weve got to replace Osti for a start, then were still relying on 1 of Fadz and Hyam again imn the back 3.
For me its 2CB more of a need than 2 LWB
PUSB-We_are_going_up
Well-Known Member
Agreed
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Fadz did well last year TBF. In an ideal world I’d want a first choice back three of Rose Osti LCB with Pask/Drysdale Fadz and Hyam as backup. Get the impression budget is limited though.
Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
Priority is:
LWB
CB to Replace Osti
CB to improve defence
CDM
GK.
LWB
CB to Replace Osti
CB to improve defence
CDM
GK.
Saddlebrains
Well-Known Member
CDK
Well-Known Member
That will do.
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
Possibly because we need a better Kelly. That grafter who just breaks up play. As talismanic as he is, he’s likely to be injured 10 games in
Half or your posts are absolute nonsense and half bang on. This falls into the second category
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
But where do you play him? Ahead of Sheaf?