I didn't say it was asset stripping mate, I was just referring to the furore that happened when we initially moved him on.LG that type of deal helps long term finance of selling club's so it isn't asset stripping as you stated and another percentage from another sale is good news if Madison moves on.
I’m sure I have read somewhere it is 15% but it is off the profit so you have to take off what Leicester paid Norwich which I think was £20million so doing the maths it looks to me to be about £900k.
Nice little earner
Imagine if our third hand sell on on Madderz10 allowed us to sign Ostigard
LG that type of deal helps long term finance of selling club's so it isn't asset stripping as you stated and another percentage from another sale is good news if Madison moves on.
Jamie Paterson is on trial at Middlesbrough
If we offered him a contract and Middlesbrough offered him a trial, surely he would rather take the contract than perform the trial. Surprised by him being on trial considering we apparently offered him good terms but he wanted first team. If he's on trial that would suggest hes not gonna be first choice at Middlesbrough.Simple, highest bidder wins. But that move closer to home he wanted didn’t happen.
£50m on Ben White and £60m on Maddison....can't see it myself. Even with Premiership money they'd have to sell a fair bit to justify that. Lacazette only has one year left on his contract so won't go for huge amounts. hold, just remembered they've got the Sheaf money.......
Patterson won't be signing for us now, that's dead in the water, needed 1 more attacking midfielder to take some work load off O'Hare and we got Bright. If he turned us down originally in favour of a trial, good luck to him.
I also wonder whether that Bright approaching us or becoming available actually was more appealing to MR than Paterson. Like Bright fits our model and we all agree has exceptional talent and could make us a good profit in the future.Granted he'd be a solid signing but for the wages he'd likely demand I question whether bringing him in would be a wise use of resources.
2 players for every position can’t have being battered 4-0 every week, honestly refund every signingAll gone a bit quiet hasnt it
What we saying then, all agreed on 2 CB's, 1LWB, 1CM?
All gone a bit quiet hasnt it
What we saying then, all agreed on 2 CB's, 1LWB, 1CM?
All gone a bit quiet hasnt it
What we saying then, all agreed on 2 CB's, 1LWB, 1CM?
Well done, you are yet to mention him today. You are doing well.Telegraph seems to be implying 1 CB and 2 LWBs and a CM.
I won’t say what I want for fear of awakening the beast.
Nice to see someone else gets an erection chatting about incoming transfers....Telegraph seems to be implying 1 CB and 2 LWBs and a CM.
I won’t say what I want for fear of awakening the beast.
AgreedGenuine question,
Why is everyone happy for 1cb?
Weve got to replace Osti for a start, then were still relying on 1 of Fadz and Hyam again imn the back 3.
For me its 2CB more of a need than 2 LWB
Genuine question,
Why is everyone happy for 1cb?
Weve got to replace Osti for a start, then were still relying on 1 of Fadz and Hyam again imn the back 3.
For me its 2CB more of a need than 2 LWB
Priority is:
LWB
CB to Replace Osti
CB to improve defence
CDM
GK.
That will do.Priority is:
LWB
CB to Replace Osti
CB to improve defence
CDM
GK.
Possibly because we need a better Kelly. That grafter who just breaks up play. As talismanic as he is, he’s likely to be injured 10 games inWithout wanting another argument. Why is everyone so sure we need a other DM? We’ve got Sheaf and Kelly to come back, plus Eccles and Hamer.
Telegraph say it so there’s probably something to it, but seems further down the list than the other IMO.
Genuine question,
Why is everyone happy for 1cb?
Weve got to replace Osti for a start, then were still relying on 1 of Fadz and Hyam again imn the back 3.
For me its 2CB more of a need than 2 LWB
Possibly because we need a better Kelly. That grafter who just breaks up play. As talismanic as he is, he’s likely to be injured 10 games in
Half or your posts are absolute nonsense and half bang on. This falls into the second category
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?