21/22 Summer transfer mega-thread (5 Viewers)

[oldfiver]

I'd like the little wet nosey! Soooooo cute!

It's yours!

 

---

[covcity4life]

You can hope but it depends on what "a bit of a kitty " you are expecting

We still have a sell on? He's already gone from norwich to leicester. Thay eoukd have been when we got paid?

 

[shmmeee]

You can hope but it depends on what "a bit of a kitty " you are expecting

Couple of hundred thousand?

Just enough to get another loan would do. I’m not greedy.

 

[shmmeee]

We still have a sell on? He's already gone from norwich to leicester. Thay eoukd have been when we got paid?

Sell ons apply to any money the other club receives, including their own sell ons

 

[covcity4life]

Sell ons apply to any money the other club receives, including their own sell ons

Didnt know that

How much is rumoured? Cant be a big %?

 

[shmmeee]

Didnt know that

How much is rumoured? Cant be a big %?

Going off here, so watch your heart with all that salt, it’s 15% of 15% of the profit.

 

[AFCCOVENTRY]

Didnt know that

How much is rumoured? Cant be a big %?

Normally about 10% but depends. Could be lower or higher.

 

[oldfiver]

Sell ons apply to any money the other club receives, including their own sell ons

After deducting the initial fee and any other addons already paid

 

[TwistAndShoutCCFC1987]

NEWS: New Ticket Office and Club Shop to be cashless

Coventry City’s new Ticket Office and Club Shop will both be cashless operations when they open.

www.ccfc.co.uk

FFS We’ve got no cash it’s a disgrace , Joy get your purse out! Taxi for robins we’re going down!!!!

 

[slowpoke]

You can hope but it depends on what "a bit of a kitty " you are expecting

If the rumours of a 60million fee is correct and the 15% off the Norwich profit is correct then it could be as much as £900k doubt if MR will see much of that though.

 

[oldfiver]

If the rumours of a 60million fee is correct and the 15% off the Norwich profit is correct then it could be as much as £900k doubt if MR will see much of that though.

We do not know the terms of the deal with Norwich - not the terms of the deal between Norwich and Leicester. Even less the deal between Leicester and anyone else

 

[Alkhen]

If the rumours of a 60million fee is correct and the 15% off the Norwich profit is correct then it could be as much as £900k doubt if MR will see much of that though.

anyone know what happens when a player has a sell on fee set but the move to a new club includes players in trade? does the their value in the deal get worked out or is it just the % cut on the cash, cant be surely?

 

[skyblueelephant76]

anyone know what happens when a player has a sell on fee set but the move to a new club includes players in trade? does the their value in the deal get worked out or is it just the % cut on the cash, cant be surely?

They have assign values to the players

 

[shmmeee]

We do not know the terms of the deal with Norwich - not the terms of the deal between Norwich and Leicester. Even less the deal between Leicester and anyone else

In over a year you’ve posted almost 2,500 messages and as far as I can tell not one has been about football. All have been defending the owners or attacking those who haven’t defended the owners.

Just so people have some context.

 

[1ccfc]

We do not know the terms of the deal with Norwich - not the terms of the deal between Norwich and Leicester. Even less the deal between Leicester and anyone else

I see what you've done there. You've applied logic and sense and I don't like it. As a kid I remember looking through the argos catalogue and circling all the things I wanted for Christmas or Birthdays. With your sensible approach I wouldn't have bothered as inevitably it was a wasted effort every time. Before we find out we'll only get £10, lets run with the £900k.

 

[oldfiver]

In over a year you’ve posted almost 2,500 messages and as far as I can tell not one has been about football. All have been defending the owners or attacking those who haven’t defended the owners.

Just so people have some context.

I am not sure what your point is
I tend to limit my comments to what I can reasonably comment on. There are many more better versed on "football" than me
My response above is a case in question - the questioners raised points about how much CCFC will realise from a Maddison transfer. Presumably you do not consider that to be a "football" related question ?
My reply raised points of fact and I see no reference to defending the owners or attacking anyone else.
Perhaps I should rename to EvenOlderSkyBlue etc?

 

[oldfiver]

I see what you've done there. You've applied logic and sense and I don't like it. As a kid I remember looking through the argos catalogue and circling all the things I wanted for Christmas or Birthdays. With your sensible approach I wouldn't have bothered as inevitably it was a wasted effort every time. Before we find out we'll only get £10, lets run with the £900k.

But the writer has taken 15% of £60m - assuming £60m is all profit
So lets not run with £900k because the naysayers will want to know where the difference went if it is not that amount
I follow your point so let us drop all speculation on this site?

 

[SlowerThanPlatt]

I am not sure what your point is
I tend to limit my comments to what I can reasonably comment on. There are many more better versed on "football" than me
My response above is a case in question - the questioners raised points about how much CCFC will realise from a Maddison transfer. Presumably you do not consider that to be a "football" related question ?
My reply raised points of fact and I see no reference to defending the owners or attacking anyone else.
Perhaps I should rename to EvenOlderSkyBlue etc?

Confused here, how is a transfer clause a thing you can “reasonably comment” on but not the team?

 

[oldfiver]

Confused here, how is a transfer clause a thing you can “reasonably comment” on but not the team?

I have said others on here can make better observations and comments on the team than me. My contribution would add little

However, on matters I can contribute to - I do

 

[slowpoke]

But the writer has taken 15% of £60m - assuming £60m is all profit
So lets not run with £900k because the naysayers will want to know where the difference went if it is not that amount
I follow your point so let us drop all speculation on this site?

You will find unless it goes into the Joy Sepalla undisclosed category that it is 15% off the Norwich profit that won’t be £60million should have said, more like 40 mill which is £600k much to your disappointment

 

[SlowerThanPlatt]

I have said others on here can make better observations and comments on the team than me. My contribution would add little

However, on matters I can contribute to - I do

Oh right, so you have information regarding the deal we struck then?

 

[Saddlebrains]

16 Days until opening game.

Still havent got a defence.

 

[oldfiver]

Oh right, so you have information regarding the deal we struck then?

I clearly said "we" that includes me do not have the information etc

 

[oldfiver]

You will find unless it goes into the Joy Sepalla undisclosed category that it is 15% off the Norwich profit that won’t be £60million should have said, more like 40 mill which is £600k much to your disappointment

Gibberish

 

[oldfiver]

I clearly said "we" that includes me do not have the information etc
Read all the post

 

[slowpoke]

The full Maddison deal was released when he was sold to Norwich and again when he was sold to Leicester its on here somewhere I can’t be arsed or bothered to look

 

[SlowerThanPlatt]

I clearly said "we" that includes me do not have the information etc

You’ve not actually contributed anything though and I thought you only post when you can?

 

[shmmeee]

I am not sure what your point is
I tend to limit my comments to what I can reasonably comment on. There are many more better versed on "football" than me
My response above is a case in question - the questioners raised points about how much CCFC will realise from a Maddison transfer. Presumably you do not consider that to be a "football" related question ?
My reply raised points of fact and I see no reference to defending the owners or attacking anyone else.
Perhaps I should rename to EvenOlderSkyBlue etc?

My point is that you only post on here to talk about the owners and not the club. You claim you only post on what you know and points of fact but your post was literally “no one knows” so not sure how that stacks up.

I don’t think you’re as stupid as you’re playing but just in case: you came onto a (lighthearted) post about a possible increase in funding to downplay that possible amount without posting anything to support it. Clearly your aim is to protect the owners from accusations of underfunding should Maddison go and we don’t get any money in the kitty (however small).

I just find it interesting is all. I’m not sure there’s another poster as one note as you and therefore that makes you remarkable. You have links to the club as we know so are hardly an unbiased observer.

I think it’s fair to say if you were doing the same but against the owners as we have seen you’d have been lynched by now.

If knowing fuck all about football was a barrier to posting this site would be empty!

 

[Saddlebrains]

Why dont you 2 just shag?

 

[oldfiver]

Why dont you 2 just shag?

He is too old and pedantic

 

[SBchimp]

next season in addition to a mega transfer thread should we also have a parallel mega fight club thread.
might help direct people to the topic they are most interested in

 

[Alex1987]

I'm sure and Maddison sell on now becomes negligible. Like less than 1% of any fee of any next move

 

[NortonSkyBlue]

Speak

My point is that you only post on here to talk about the owners and not the club. You claim you only post on what you know and points of fact but your post was literally “no one knows” so not sure how that stacks up.

I don’t think you’re as stupid as you’re playing but just in case: you came onto a (lighthearted) post about a possible increase in funding to downplay that possible amount without posting anything to support it. Clearly your aim is to protect the owners from accusations of underfunding should Maddison go and we don’t get any money in the kitty (however small).

I just find it interesting is all. I’m not sure there’s another poster as one note as you and therefore that makes you remarkable. You have links to the club as we know so are hardly an unbiased observer.

I think it’s fair to say if you were doing the same but against the owners as we have seen you’d have been lynched by now.

If knowing fuck all about football was a barrier to posting this site would be empty!

speak for yourself...

 

[Ccfcisparks]

I'm sure and Maddison sell on now becomes negligible. Like less than 1% of any fee of any next move

So 1% of £60m which is £600,000? I'd hardly say thats negligible.

 

[Frostie]

They have assign values to the players

Correct. Been some shady dealings previously though with clearly misleading valuations attached to some decent players to try & circumvent it. Michel Vorm's transfer from Swansea to Spurs is a good example but Swansea got away with it.