They are disagreeing, not missing
Its blatantly obvious what he is saying, that nobody thinks we didn't need new attackers, but priorities should have been elsewhere. Which is a perfectly valid view.
Other people (I'm one of them) think that attackers were just as much of a priority because we failed to score in more games than almost every other side, and not having options up front completely dictated the way we had to play. I think thats also very valid.
Who's to say who's right or wrong, nobody will know for a fair few weeks/ months yet, but I don't think its any more than a discussion about how we're trying to develop the way we play and what players are needed to set about it. And I don't think anyone would dispute its been a weird window, its not been plain sailing.
One thing that gets lost in all this is that it seems to being taken for granted that Waghorn is a huge improvement- his scoring record was terrible last year- fair bit of pressure on him to deliver not just experience & nous but a few more goals than he scored last year.
It's hard to say Dabo and especially Rose have that experience when they were injured or unfit for so much of the season.Are you not taking any confidence from having a seasons experience in the league for rose hyam and Dabo?
09:41
DOOR OPEN FOR WALTON TO LEAVE BRIGHTON
Goalkeeper Christian Walton will be allowed to leave Brighton this summer, with several unnamed Sky Bet Championship clubs interested.
The 25-year-old, who has spent time on loan at Blackburn and Wigan in recent seasons, wants to play regular first-team football.
Walton has only one year left on his current contract and Brighton are keen to sanction a sale this month, rather than lose him on a free next summer.
Nope. Still missing. The point is the strikers don’t matter if you can’t create chances and you can’t create chances if you have to have ten men behind the ball to stop conceding. Bringing up how many we scored is proving my point. If we had high xG and low goals scored then yes we’d need better finishers, but we don’t, we need to play higher up the pitch and for that the midfield and wingbacks need to be able to leave their half and trust the defence to handle themselves.
We had two strikers who if fit were on track to score as many as Waghorn on his best season.
Nope. Still missing. The point is the strikers don’t matter if you can’t create chances and you can’t create chances if you have to have ten men behind the ball to stop conceding. Bringing up how many we scored is proving my point. If we had high xG and low goals scored then yes we’d need better finishers, but we don’t, we need to play higher up the pitch and for that the midfield and wingbacks need to be able to leave their half and trust the defence to handle themselves.
I don't view Waghorn as purely a goalscorer though, he offers far more than just that, which as much as I like Walker, isn't really the case with him.
I'm guessing you were going for hyperbole but his best season at this level was 16 goals & 11 assists with NPG/90 of 0.39, way ahead of what both Godden & Walker managed last season.
Missing. People are blathering on about Bakayoko who played 300 minutes all season when the point is our attack was poor because we had to use quantity rather than quality to plug the leaks on the pitch.
We had two strikers who if fit were on track to score as many as Waghorn on his best season. Maybe we needed another, I can accept that. But we’ve clearly spent the majority of the budget on two and still have the issues at the back that meant we couldn’t get out of our half half the time last season.
You’re saying that was Robins choice, if so then it’s a departure from his normally sensible transfer strategies of previous seasons.
Yes but they averaged no where near as many assists. Waghorn had 27 goal contributions that season which is brilliant. What Frostie is trying to say is that he offers us a goal threat as well as the versatility to play as a forward off the striker creating chances.Walkers NPG/90 was 0.35 last season. Goddens 0.37. Hardly way behind. Over a season Walker would’ve got 16, Waghorn and Godden 17.
The importance of having a left footed CB is being way over played. It's not essential, there just aren't that many out there and therefore they're more expensive. Much rather a solid right footer at LCB than chasing an average defender just because he's left footed.
It has been pointed out many times that the way the club is looking to play is to get on the front foot and be aggressive, given how successful that strategy was late on in the season. I'm not sure why you keep referring to playing 10 men behind the ball, it is irrelevant to next season.
So you’ve formed the opinion that Maatsen is weaker defensively based on 45 mins against possibly the quickest player in the world. We will recruit defenders, do you not think Robins sees this? We were crying out for a better forward and we signed one, anyone with any football knowledge can see that. You spout constant, negative bile. Fucking boring palNope. Still missing. The point is the strikers don’t matter if you can’t create chances and you can’t create chances if you have to have ten men behind the ball to stop conceding. Bringing up how many we scored is proving my point. If we had high xG and low goals scored then yes we’d need better finishers, but we don’t, we need to play higher up the pitch and for that the midfield and wingbacks need to be able to leave their half and trust the defence to handle themselves.
Walkers NPG/90 was 0.35 last season. Goddens 0.37. Hardly way behind. Over a season Walker would’ve got 16, Waghorn and Godden 17.
We will be able to play the way we want to do much easier with a left footed LCB. Watching Hyam either scuff it forward with his left foot out of play or turn around and pass back to the keeper was not good
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's not NPG, it's including penalties isn't it?
Walker scored 6 (1pen) in 1801mins
NPG/90 = 0.30
Godden scored 6 (2pens) in 1452mins
NPG/90 = 0.25
Would it be ideal? Yes.
But it's not essential and it's being massively overplayed. I'd say the majority of teams that play 3 at the back don't have a left footer at LCB.
For example I'd rather sign Ostigard and play Hyam LCB, than sign Clarke-Salter so he can play LCB.
Being a good defender and good player takes massive precedence over left or right foot in that position.
All true, but we now have options up front that will worry the opposition, Bright and Jones will give us pace and skill off the bench which we didnt have last season, Gyokres and Waghorn are different class compared to Bakayoko and Biamou, Sheaf and Hamer are far more experienced than this time last year, AND we arnt being hampered by an extended lay off!Even if we signed Osti we’d be the same team that needed 9 defensive players on the pitch to stop leaking goals.
I think going forward we have much more talent this season. Maatsen looks better in the final third than McCallum, Sheaf is much more progressive than Kelly, a fit Dabo is a threat. But defensively Maatsen looks like a downgrade, our main CB is a year older, and our keeper doesn’t inspire confidence IMO. So I don’t see how we’re going to utilise this new found attacking talent when we’ll need them all behind the ball protecting the back line.
People build up this picture of a player and decide they're bad, even if the majority haven't actually seen him play. Clarke-Salter is a good ball playing CB that we would have been dreaming of signing 2 years ago. Alot of people on here live on cloud 9 and think we should be in for Gary Cahill, but then if we did get him, moan about how much we are paying him!On what basis is Clarke-Salter not a good defender? Plus his ability on the ball surpasses anything else we have, he will be a massive asset.
Bottom line: do you panicking after the transfer window has shut!
The assessment is based on having never seen the left wing back or keeper play and some ridiculous nostalgia for James and particularly Ostigard. With still some time before the season begins and transfer window closes.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
On what basis is Clarke-Salter not a good defender? Plus his ability on the ball surpasses anything else we have, he will be a massive asset.
Exactly and this all seems to originate from criticisms of Hyam's passing which was no worse than Ostigard's.The importance of having a left footed CB is being way over played. It's not essential, there just aren't that many out there and therefore they're more expensive. Much rather a solid right footer at LCB than chasing an average defender just because he's left footed.
Agree with this. Overall I am not convinced we have strengthened the squad, especially as we have lost James, McCallum and Ostigard,and they were some of our most influential players. However, my suspicion is that most of the teams around our level will be weaker.What has been said about James and Ostigard? They were two of our better players, certainly Ostigard was one of the first names on the team sheet. We haven't replaced either of them, let alone strengthen the defence or central midfield.
Of course, time will tell, but I am apprehensive to say the least. The question for me is how weak the league might be this year, that will work in our favour.
I haven't said he's a bad defender.
All I'm saying is overall ability takes massive precedence over what foot they are stronger with.
What if Clarke-Salter turns out to be just as good/better defensively than Osti as well as naturally offering balance on the left side & being an enormous upgrade in possession?
Well that's entirely different of course. Then it's a perfect signing.
I'm just saying that being left footed isn't the be all and end all that some are making it out to be. And that I, and I'm sure Robins too, would rather sign a better right footed defender than a slightly inferior left footed defender.
Hyam gets a lot of stick but had a better pass completion rate than Ostigard.
He was a major part to survival I’m sure we will see his presence missed soon enoughFeel free to check my history, I rated him and could see the impact he had while half the forum thought he was bang average.
My point remains though, he wasn’t a world beater, he wouldn’t single handedly win your games. He kept the ball moving, could pick a pass when needed and was positionally smart. They aren’t especially unique attributes, and in my view we have someone who has all those traits, but they’re overshadowed by the mistakes he’s makes - mistakes I expect will disappear this year.
Fair point I’ve been saying we haven’t replaced osti but haven’t seen the Chelsea lad play maybe he’s betterOk, fair enough but you said you'd rather sign Østigård. I assumed the comment about not signing someone average just because he's left footed was aimed at Clarke-Salter.
What if Clarke-Salter turns out to be just as good/better defensively than Osti as well as naturally offering balance on the left side & being an enormous upgrade in possession?
I hope we're nothing like Barnsley, the football they played was atrocious. They'll find their level this season.We have the best pressing CAM in the league and Waghorn is a pressing forward, we’re clearly making that tactical tweak.
Personally, I think it’ll be effective and hopefully we’re difficult to beat in a similar way to Barnsley were last season.
We really do need the 2-3 signings Robins is hoping, but I’m optimistic about our team.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?