shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Literally anyone the point is to waste time and break up momentum.
Who did you want brought on to see the game out? Dasilva? Binks? Fabio Tavares?
What subs would you have made? It does irritate me when fans just want a manager to make changes for the sake of it.Yes the main complaint is the awful game management. We had subs left. We were still attacking and leaving ourselves open after the equaliser.
I’m not too bothered by the result, we always lose to Norwich, but it’s yet more evidence we’ve got a team and a manager who can’t do the basics.
What subs would you have made? It does irritate me when fans just want a manager to make changes for the sake of it.
Looking at our bench, there was only really Torp to bring on. Sakamoto was supposedly not 100% so that leaves:
Binks
JDS
Tavares
Rapha
Kitching was having a good game so would you change Binks for him? I’m assuming you wouldn’t bring on JDS for Bidwell when defending a lead. Tavares and Rapha, no evidence they can impact the game. So really, the only sub he possibly should’ve made was Torp for Allen.
It’s individual errors that led to their second. First was Lati trying to buy a foul which let the winger in. When the cross was made, the shape of the midfielders (Allen and Eccles) collapsed in the box and they dropped deeper. Watching it closely, you see Thomas and Kitching push past them and Kitching ended up being closest to the shooter. It should’ve been Allen/Eccles who was closing them down.
All the subs available were probably a downgrade defensively on what we had on the pitch, and changing shape can be risky.Literally anyone the point is to waste time and break up momentum.
Yeah, did you see the state of the 22/23 after the loanees went back and selling Vik and Hamer?So we’ve spent c£40 million on players who, half way into the season are not good enough and we still need 2/4 more to be a playoff side?
I give up!
Seems like Frank needs to get shithousing some of the fuckers and be the gaffer, not pally pally with them.
So who would you have brought on? Just saying anyone isn’t helpful. I could see a logic in bringing on Tavares to just stretch the play potentially or maybe Torp for BTA and play 5-4-1 to seal the drawWe’d been under the cosh all half and had just conceded. At the very least I’d have told us to not be too risky. Again the point was running down the clock, the specific sub is irrelevant but a defender on for an attacker for four minutes would be the obvious one.
So who would you have brought on? Just saying anyone isn’t helpful. I could see a logic in bringing on Tavares to just stretch the play potentially or maybe Torp for BTA and play 5-4-1 to seal the draw
If anything, the more viable critique is that we seemed to consider going for the win when really we probably should’ve hunkered down for the draw. It’s why Lati was in the RB area of the pitch for their second rather than MVE.
A manager can’t do a lot if the team makes a few mistakes as we did for their winner. It’s not tactical and nor would a sub have necessarily stopped it happening.
Binks for who?It’s five minutes to go and your backs are to the wall formations are irrelevant. Just throw Binks on for another body. Again the point was to break momentum and waste time not enact some tactical masterplan.
Binks for who?
You’re just playing captain hindsight because we lost. There were no logical subs to make, wasting 30s which will likely be added back on anyway to make our team worse defensively would not have been a good choice.Fucking anyone. You’re entirely missing the point.
You’re just playing captain hindsight because we lost. There were no logical subs to make, wasting 30s which will likely be added back on anyway to make our team worse defensively would not have been a good choice.
So who would you have brought on? Just saying anyone isn’t helpful. I could see a logic in bringing on Tavares to just stretch the play potentially or maybe Torp for BTA and play 5-4-1 to seal the draw
If anything, the more viable critique is that we seemed to consider going for the win when really we probably should’ve hunkered down for the draw. It’s why Lati was in the RB area of the pitch for their second rather than MVE.
A manager can’t do a lot if the team makes a few mistakes as we did for their winner. It’s not tactical and nor would a sub have necessarily stopped it happening.
Been happening all year, but there were points of the game on Sat that people needed telling and nothing was happening.“Accepting what was going on around them”… we were winning for the majority of the match?
Some criticism on here is totally baffling
Just two of them separately if it was allowed that's all.Who did you want brought on to see the game out? Dasilva? Binks? Fabio Tavares?
Just two of them separately if it was allowed that's all.
Lesson learned we hope,guile added to the portfolio of this manager and the one before him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?