Accounts Published - May 2024 (23 Viewers)

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
We don’t average 20k a week. Probably only 4 or 5 players on that or above. I wonder if that’s the total staff costs? Players, coaching staff, shop staff, tea lady etc.

Wage bill of £24m (including NI and pension contributions) is for absolutely everybody employed by the club, 153 players and coaches and 61 admin and commercial. The players and coaches employee numbers have fallen since 2023 whereas the admin and commercial have increased by 80% (probably due to onboarding the retail + some additional other commercially focused roles). The wages and salaries is just over £20m. The average salary of a player in the first team squad is nowhere near 20k.
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
That’s what I thought so why are they claiming it’s an extension
Season 5 Idk GIF by NBC
 

Earlsdon-Loyal-Blue

Well-Known Member
Genuinely positive but some concerns/questions, although I’m not an accountant.

We only made £23.5M profit on Gyokeres and Hamer. This is based on book value (not transfer outlay), so as they were in the last year of their contracts with amortisation over their last 2-3 years - I’d have expected this to be higher. We have trade debtors of £17.8M so this suggests we’ve only received ~£6M upfront for Gyokeres and Hamer… which is probably why King needed to loan the £30M.

King has written the £30M as being unsecured and without interest which is a positive but with a maturity date of 2 years time. I guess he will need to extend this unless we generate £12.2M on player sales on top of the trade debtors to pay him back?

We have spent circ £35M on player registrations (the asset) and have trade creditors of circa £6M so that infers we have paid £29M upfront… hopefully so that we get better deals rather than paying more for over 3 years etc.
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
Genuinely positive but some concerns/questions, although I’m not an accountant.

We only made £23.5M profit on Gyokeres and Hamer. This is based on book value (not transfer outlay), so as they were in the last year of their contracts with amortisation over their last 2-3 years - I’d have expected this to be higher. We have trade debtors of £17.8M so this suggests we’ve only received ~£6M upfront for Gyokeres and Hamer… which is probably why King needed to loan the £30M.

King has written the £30M as being unsecured and without interest which is a positive but with a maturity date of 2 years time. I guess he will need to extend this unless we generate £12.2M on player sales on top of the trade debtors to pay him back?

We have spent circ £35M on player registrations (the asset) and have trade creditors of circa £6M so that infers we have paid £29M upfront… hopefully so that we get better deals rather than paying more for over 3 years etc.
Imagine Doug would keep kicking the can down the road regarding the loan until he sells the club and demands payment in full.
 

Cally Fedora

Well-Known Member
Fairly standard. Key points reading between the lines. Club along with most others is dependant on a benefactor (King). He seems to have put a 2 year ceiling on prem status tied in to when he wants his cash back. If we get to the prem he’ll pay himself back. If not he’ll try and recoup via selling to someone else. We haven’t bought anything for £2m. That will be the capital additions tarting up Ryton.
 

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
Fairly standard. Key points reading between the lines. Club along with most others is dependant on a benefactor (King). He seems to have put a 2 year ceiling on prem status tied in to when he wants his cash back. If we get to the prem he’ll pay himself back. If not he’ll try and recoup via selling to someone else. We haven’t bought anything for £2m. That will be the capital additions tarting up Ryton.
Why do you say he has a 2 year ceiling on getting to the Premier league or sell up. He might not want to sell at all.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Fairly standard. Key points reading between the lines. Club along with most others is dependant on a benefactor (King). He seems to have put a 2 year ceiling on prem status tied in to when he wants his cash back. If we get to the prem he’ll pay himself back. If not he’ll try and recoup via selling to someone else. We haven’t bought anything for £2m. That will be the capital additions tarting up Ryton.
Supposition.
 

Cally Fedora

Well-Known Member
Why do you say he has a 2 year ceiling on getting to the Premier league or sell up. He might not want to sell at all.
He’s set the maturity date on his own loan as two years. No need to do that if he didn’t have something in mind. Of course it’s possible he’ll extend but if that’s his thinking why put the time limit on in the first place. He’s not a fan, he’s a businessman.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top