I'm not just on about this thread I'm on about generally.
So some bloke has said all ST holders are wankers big deal, I'm a ST holder not going to cry over it, that's his view I had my view over Sfields you had yours.
As was mentioned before you can reform you can buy the history back to attach to the new club. I know it's not the same but what other choice will we have if we do fold?
Not even saying I would follow that club properly not if I'm honest.
I would just go to watch Cov now and again and then go to B and Q and finish off my house after 20 years of waiting.
Yes to be fairDid they all avoid Wembley?
The fact you really can't see why somebody who purposely makes things up to get fans angry is driving a wedge is baffling.
The only reason I know about guys like this is because you never stop going on about him or the few like him. If they’re the wedge you’re a hammer knocking them in. Not sure why you keep giving them oxygen, all you’re doing is assisting them.
Because plenty of others see it, I did try to bring it up privately first but nobody really seems interested that a Trust Board member is up to that sort of thing. Maybe nobody else can see that while CJ and Moz etc are doing things to communicate with fans there are others stood in the background throwing bombs over their shoulder.
Oh well.
Because the guy is speaking for himself. What is there to be interested about? The only person making anything of it is you, you’re like his partner in crime the way you promote it when there’s far more serious things to be concerned about. This guy and others like him regardless of who they are don’t even register on my radar. The only thing I remember about them is you promoting them, helping him in particularly to drive the very wedge you’re complaining about. Give it up.
So anyway this forum went meltdown about a topic that was never important.. here is the SBT press release following the meeting which not surprisingly doesn't mention Phoenix clubs.
Sky Blue Trust Open Meeting 28th January - Press Release
Sky Blue Trust - Sky Blue Trust Open Meeting 28th January - Press Release
Published: 31 January 2019
Last Monday the Sky Blue Trust called a meeting to give all Coventry City fans the opportunity to have their input on the stadium issues that threaten the future of our club and to offer any suggestions as to what supporters can do to break the impasse.
We invited Joy Seppala, Tim Fisher and David Boddy to the meeting but received no response. We also invited representatives from Wasps and Coventry City Council who responded to say they were unable to attend.
Approximately 100 attended the meeting, many of whom were angry and frustrated that there had been no resolution to this damaging issue.
At the start of the meeting it was outlined to those in attendance how the Trust’s “Countdown to Homelessness campaign, which was in operation for the second successive season had targeted all key stakeholders, including club owners, CCFC Chief Executive, CCFC Chairman, Coventry City Council, EFL, Local MP’s etc., appealing for their input to seek a solution to the potential “homelessness” issue.
We then provided an update on the support we had received from a large number of local MP’s and the action they were taking, following our intervention, to arrange meetings with the parties concerned.
Members attending the meeting were keen to continue to raise the profile by writing individual letter to MP’s to further seek their support. Particularly the two local MP’s who had not yet responded despite repeated contact.
There was also a view that with Coventry soon to receive both “City of Culture” and “City of Sport” status, that Coventry City Council may be persuaded to take a more active role in seeking a solution. The Trust has sought meetings with the Council and will continue to do so.
It was also agreed that talks with the EFL be pursued to seek clarity on the allocation of the “Golden Share”, confirmation of the deadlines they are imposing on the club owners to confirm where the Sky Blues will be playing next season and critically, should no solution be found, what action they will take about the clubs place in the football league. There was also a call to raise concerns with them about Tim Fisher’s untenable position due to the conflict of interest between his concurrent roles as: Sole Director of Otium Entertainment and co-Director of Sky Blue Sports & Leisure, two of the litigants against Wasps; and Chairman of Coventry City FC, trading name of Otium, which is the tenant of Wasps.
It was also felt that the EFL should endeavour to speak directly with Joy Seppala to try and identify her intentions for the football club.
The meeting was also keen for the Trust to continue to seek meetings with both the owners of Coventry City FC and Wasps RFC.
There were a number of other ideas suggested in the form of protest and raising awareness on a National level, targeted at each of the parties involved and these will be considered further and allocated amongst different groups in attendance.
The Sky Blue Trust will now be writing to both those attending the meeting and members generally to outline how it intends to take these plans forward.
Yes just the link with your dismissive critique. I think it's best people judge for themselves and see it in full, don't you agree?It has already been posted....
Yes just the link with your dismissive critique. I think it's best people judge for themselves and see it in full, don't you agree?
No time for that LG, they've been having important meetings with the council.@CJ_covblaze Any update on where my open letter idea is or when the full transcript of the meeting will be out?
And before you ask that is the entire thing. Nothing about the council lying to us about ACL 'washing its face', nothing about the council lying to us and say a deal would only be done if it protected the football club. What a joke.The Sky Blue Trust met Coventry City Councillors today and have issued the following statement.
" A group from the Sky Blue Trust met today with senior Councillors and Officers from Coventry City Council.
Representatives of the City Council recognised the efforts of the Sky Blue Trust to engage with all relevant parties in connection with the impasse over Coventry City FC’s playing arrangements at the RICOH Arena.
The City Council is supportive of the Sky Blue Trust’s attempts to develop a viable and satisfactory solution with all parties.
The Trust recognises the limitations imposed upon the City Council by the ongoing litigation between Sky Blue Sports & Leisure Limited, Avro Master Fund Limited and Otium Entertainment Group Limited versus Coventry City Council ".
Not sure how the council coped with all that pressure.Will it be announced what was said? Looks like a "but we pressured the council" box ticked.
OldSkyBlue gets a side job?The Sky Blue Trust has commissioned a detailed, researched account of the key facts which has been compiled by a well respected Chartered Accountant
Interesting that the club isn't mentioned in the key stakeholders section...So there are a few matchday protests, there's a shock.
Interesting that they are trying to get confidential meetings with the council, Wasps and EFL but inviting Fisher to open meetings.
It's pretty predictable really isn't it? "Reach out to the media", "protest at games".
The only good thing will be the article dispelling myths
The pattern is always the same and ends up in the same way.
"meet and discuss"
"we are listening to what people say"
"we blame them all"
"sisu protest lads? wahey get on it"
Interesting that the club isn't mentioned in the key stakeholders section...
I think I actually laughed out loud when I saw the article listed under the section on 'establishing & communicating the real facts'I really should be selling my services of seeing into the future.
If somebody wants this week's lottery tickets, I can give them to you if you donate £50 to charity. There are no guarantees.
I did fail to predict an article completely ignoring any blame that other parties may have, even I thought that would be too extreme.
Hope to be proved wrong but given they are citing Johnson’s piece as a factual reference I have my doubts about this being unbiased.The only good thing will be the article dispelling myths
Hope to be proved wrong but given they are citing Johnson’s piece as a factual reference I have my doubts about this being unbiased.
The Trust are in a position of responsibility and everything *everything* they do should be to put pressure on a rental deal being done asap. Letters to parties should be open for all to read, they have lost a lot of respect so need to be seen to be doing the right thing not just doing it, they should be a force for uniting a divided fan base when actually they are a cause for division. Get the myth busting statement out now, get everyone on the same page, once were somewhere near parity then they should write the open letters to all parties from a united front of city fans. Demand meetings with all parties in the public on CWR and in the Telegraph. Demand the council don't wash their hands of the football club, remind them of their commitments and threaten them at the ballot box. Demand Sisu act as responsible owners, remind them their greatest chance of a return is a successful clubs and threaten them with direct action to their investors. Demand Wasps never make the club homeless, remind them they are new in the city and threaten them with protests and disruptions.
Just do something, be seen doing it and don't do the same things that have failed time and time again.
Exactly what I was saying with the letters. Write an initial one politely inviting them to a meeting with the other parties, if they refuse tell them that it is unacceptable and further action will be taken against them if they continue with their refusal. If they refuse again then plan action and inform them this will happen until they come to the table.
Same for the other parties, no pussy footing around anyone while at the same time keeping it professional and respectable.
I have already copied and pasted your message into an email and proposed something gets done.
Thank you.
Please let me know what comes of it, how long do you expect it to be reviewed? Also when the full report of the meeting is published.
One part of what you suggested has already been implemented.
Yeah...It’s all well and good saying we’re getting a new training ground, but like the stadium - seems to have gone quiet
Its a nice idea but think Ryton will struggle to meet the criteria. And if it does how much protection does it really give? Isn't it just that you get six months once the owner puts it up for sale to raise money and make a bid?To be fair, I like the idea of Ryton being an Asset of Community Value. Could back SISU into a corner with regards to what they want to do with the club long term.
The article regarding the facts has been written by a well respected chartered accountant who is highly regarded by the fanbase and the local area. It dispels certain myths from every side of the argument and is an excellent piece. With regards to Luton if anyone that is going can help us on the day (it's nothing strenuous) with the set up for the demonstration please get in touch. It's probably going to be for 20-30 minutes once the turnstiles open. I must state that it's 100% about keeping our club at the Ricoh. The only side that will be mentioned will be the 11 lads on the pitch who it will actually help in the process.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?