I think you will always have who created the creator argument. It doesn't clarify anything with the discovery of new life either, other than that it surely proving that the Bible and Koran etc. were written by man for man.
I am not sure it can ever be truly explained. There surely can't have always been a creator. You would say there has to be something before any creator, but then what? A creator that created a creator? Who created that one?
I do think there must be a scientific answer rather than a religious godly one.
The God thing will never make sense to me due to the if God created mankind, who created God? What was before God?
Why all these billions of planets? And if there was a God why would he make nature so cruel?
For me, there has to be life on other planets. We simply cannot be the only planet out of billions of planets to have life upon it.
Seem to remember as a kid someone telling me that the brain has some kind of filter to prevent us thinking to much on these subjects as we would go nuts, probably not true
I like to think of it as something that is too much for our brains to fathom. It is a human trait to create and attach reason, it is likely that there is no reason for it all.
Your estimate of planets is way off:Space is so large and vast with millions even billions of planets .
I believe there absolutely has to Be life somewhere else .
I watched a programme and one of the scientists put it brilliantly
“If earth is one in a million , then there’s millions of earths out there “
But then if we had the ways and the means we would surely be making contact with them wouldn't we?
We have been seeking out intelligent life now on other worlds for decades.
If we could fly across the universe and knew of life on other planets we WOULD be trying to make contact.
So basically even more likely that living things exist elsewhereYour estimate of planets is way off:
How many planets are there in the universe?
With at least 200 billion galaxies out there (and possibly even more), we're very likely talking about a Universe filled with around 10 to the 24th power planets, or, for those of you who like it written out, around 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets in our observable Universe.Jan 5, 2013
You would travel through a woods though hoping maybe to make contact with some animals wouldn't you?If you are wandering through the woods and come across a fungus growing on a tree, do you try to make contact with it?
Have you tried to make contact with a fish swimming in the sea?
How about a spider? Contacted any of them recently?
Why? Because you realise it is pointless; there is no point of reference, no means of communication.
I put it down as nosey neighbours.I don't think that the fact that they have not deliberately made contact but may have been visible is proof of anything. It's assuming we would know their motivations for travelling - and we don't.
Yes, they have encountered, observed, and no doubt studied us, but not made contact as we have not done with most other species here on Earth.You would travel through a woods though hoping maybe to make contact with some animals wouldn't you?
You would travel to planets hoping to encounter life. It is something we have been endeavouring to do for decades now.
The Drake equation : "The universe has 10 million, million, million suns (10 followed by 18 zeros) similar to our own. One in a million has planets around it. Only one in a million million has the right combination of chemicals, temperature, water, days and nights to support planetary life as we know it. This calculation arrives at the estimated figure of 100 million worlds where life has been forged by evolution."There was an article in the Telegraph a week or so ago reporting on comments from a former head of a US government programme. Google shows me that it was also reported in other broadsheets.
Existence of extra-terrestrial craft 'proved beyond reasonable doubt', says former Pentagon X-Files chief
This of course could be fake news. The same guy also said that SISU had accepted his offer to buy the Sky Blues. However, let's imagine, for the purposes of this thread, that it is real.
I'm generally sceptical of most things (both supernatural and bizarre claims on the internet), however I am willing to entertain the possibility that intelligent life exists elsewhere and that it may have cracked the problems of travelling huge distances. So after I read this I thought about the scenario for a while.
If aliens have visited Earth without deliberately making contact then first of all I think that's good news: they do not have malicious intent. And then I started thinking about why they would hold back.
We have been stuck in the mechanical age for travel for about 100 years. In recent years we have invented computers and that technology is growing quickly - but it's no more than a stepping stone towards inter-stellar travel. And we still don't understand the Universe.
I think that if inter-stellar travel is possible then it will come from leveraging the structure of the Universe: taking advantage of quantum behaviour and/or dark energy or dark matter (which may turn out to be all related). I didn't study physics and so apologise in advance to anyone here who did and thinks that my thoughts are naive... and would love to learn from you.
It strikes me that humans need to make that leap from mechanical to 'universe-structural' travel before aliens would have any interest in making contact. That could be many thousands of years away. Or equally, a breakthrough with current theories could mean it is only a hundred years away. I like the idea of super-symmetry and also other dimensions - but that's possibly my maths background (liking elegant solutions).
Anyone else thinking about this issue? Thoughts?
No-one apart from Thom Yorke, who is f**king special. In fact, so f**king special.The Drake equation : "The universe has 10 million, million, million suns (10 followed by 18 zeros) similar to our own. One in a million has planets around it. Only one in a million million has the right combination of chemicals, temperature, water, days and nights to support planetary life as we know it. This calculation arrives at the estimated figure of 100 million worlds where life has been forged by evolution."
I have no time for claims regarding the "supernatural" but when it comes to the alien life, this is a probability that sits firmly in the natural (requires no magic, religious belief or miracle) I'm not saying we have been visited by little green men, in wobbly saucer shaped craft with a penchant for bothering cattle, but all peer reviewed scientific evidence relative to the subject points to the highest probability that we are not special.
Yeah, but he's just a creep!No-one apart from Thom Yorke, who is f**king special. I'm fact, so f**king special.
In that case, I'm sure many of them no longer exist. If it takes the light that long to reach us (13 billion years), they could be long since gone. Certainly, any civilisations in those Galaxies may not yet have developed or may have already been extinguished. 13 billion years is a long time.<snip> in a dark space that looked like was no light coming from it, they were wrong they found 10,000 galaxies in a tiny space observed 1/10th the size of the moons view from earth, those galaxies were nearly 13 billion light years away!
You could have made you point more distinctly if you had chosen some of his more flamboyant outfits to be honest.Aliens exist and are living among us right here on Earth. Here is photographic proof.
This one masquerades as a musician called 'Elton John', yeah right!
View attachment 8729 View attachment 8732 View attachment 8730 View attachment 8731
13 billion years is a long time.
I would change 'must be' to 'surely is.'FWIW I always think the, 'there must be life on other planets' argument no more plausible than the, 'there must be a creator who made everything' argument. No conclusive evidence, just conjecture.
Why must there be?
FWIW I always think the, 'there must be life on other planets' argument no more plausible than the, 'there must be a creator who made everything' argument. No conclusive evidence, just conjecture.
Why must there be?
Maybe if they were a particularly lazy creator.I would change 'must be' to 'surely is.'
Would be very odd I would say out of billions and billions and billions and billions of planets to only have life on one of them.
That is surely a lot more astounding than accepting that we surely can't be the only ones out there.
And on the creator point, if there is a creator out there somewhere, why would they create hundreds of billions of planets and then just put life on just one single solitary one?
arisen and become extinct... when their nearby Sun blew up/went Nova.Whereas the pure numbers of the universe make it more likely than not that there’s a significant number of Goldilocks planets out there and the length of time the universe has been around makes it likely life has arisen on one or more of these planets.
arisen and become extinct... when their nearby Sun blew up/went Nova.
Like that novel your started writing at age 13 but never finished?Maybe if they were a particularly lazy creator.
Well there is evidence that life exists elsewhere - UFOs. But there is zero evidence a creator exists.FWIW I always think the, 'there must be life on other planets' argument no more plausible than the, 'there must be a creator who made everything' argument. No conclusive evidence, just conjecture.
Why must there be?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?