The reasons against the Butts park are numerous.
The game of Rugby is far harder on the playing surface than Football, and if played on it on a weekly basis it would turn into a mud pile.
The police might not approve on the grounds that the area might not be suitable for increased parking and the congestion it may cause.
Would it have the capacity to hold the potential gates, away fans, and cup games ?
Would the "Football league" approve it as suitable, in the long or short term ?
The loss of gate revenue would probably be far greater, than paying the rent on the Ricoh, making the financial situation even worse.
No! the sums do not add up, not for me anyway, others may present a different view???
The game of Rugby is far harder on the playing surface than Football, and if played on it on a weekly basis it would turn into a mud pile.
The police might not approve on the grounds that the area might not be suitable for increased parking and the congestion it may cause.
Would it have the capacity to hold the potential gates, away fans, and cup games ?
Would the "Football league" approve it as suitable, in the long or short term ?
The loss of gate revenue would probably be far greater, than paying the rent on the Ricoh, making the financial situation even worse.
No! the sums do not add up, not for me anyway, others may present a different view???