stupot07
Well-Known Member
Pure conjecture with no factual evidence.
And so is saying that another more experienced manager would do better with our squad.
Pure conjecture with no factual evidence.
Pure conjecture with no factual evidence.
Despite being handed the worst budget for any manager since relegation:
1) He has brought 3 youth players into the first time and managed them well, and got performances from them.
2) The players work for him
3) He actually IS 'gutted' when we lose.
I don't think Coleman, Adams, Dowie or Bothroyd could claim to cover all those 3 points.
Adams : Pig-headed, unattractive football, players fell out with him
Dowie : Great guy, motivator, woefully inept tactically, soft?
Coleman : Was his heart in it? Negative football, Talked a lot of crap!!
Pure conjecture with no factual evidence.
He merely said experienced manager, you then chose one that suited your intention to show him as wrong so no.
Ok then: Ian Holloway. There's an example of a manager with experience who did well with an underfunded club who at the time were tipped for League One. Is that your claim disproved or have I just been very selective also?
He said he thinks experienced managers are more likely to succeed, he didn't say one definitely would.
It's called OPINION KD: or isn't anyone else allowed one?
Although Adams - with over 10 years experience DB - didn't manage so at Sheffield United last season, dear chap
I though you didn't like sweeping generalizations to prove a point. One statistical fact is Adams was the best manager we had in this league and would probably have been ok if his paranoid behaviour hadn't surfaced.
I though you didn't like sweeping generalizations to prove a point. One statistical fact is Adams was the best manager we had in this league and would probably have been ok if his paranoid behaviour hadn't surfaced.
Not by a long shot. His win ratio was roughly 30% same as Coleman, Reid, Boothroyd, etc. The best three were undisputably Nillsson, Black and Dowie and only Dowie did that over more than 20 games.
Sorry, but you did just call someone out for stating things as facts without evidence.
Final league position. That said I do concede dowies ratio is really surprising. If wikeprdia is correct I may take an even dimmer view of ranson than I already had. I am surprised.
That 8th place finish is deceiving though. We were garbage then shot up at the end to finish well off the playoffs but top of the middle pile.
It's not like we were ever seriously challenging that season.
I think Dowie is the most underrated CCFC manager since we came down. The one thing I really don't like Ranson for was sacking him for non-footballing reasons.
That 8th place finish is deceiving though. We were garbage then shot up at the end to finish well off the playoffs but top of the middle pile.
It's not like we were ever seriously challenging that season.
I think Dowie is the most underrated CCFC manager since we came down. The one thing I really don't like Ranson for was sacking him for non-footballing reasons.
I think Dowie was good with the players for sure.
Though he was woeful in the transfer Market and I remember a palace fan on CWR warning us that he was too.
Didn't Dowie sign Fox and Dann? I could be wrong!!
To back up your point though... he did sign Borrowdale!!
I just don't like sweeping generalisations being used to prove a point. Experienced managers aren't always likely to succeed. I think Holloway's a decent manager, sure.