So read the 31 pages of Barnsley’s accounts and tell me where they lack transparency - it’s my year end in March and I’ll be reviewing with my accountant shortly - are you suggesting they are lying about wages turnover and transfer fees which are the key YOY variances?
Oh I forgot - you haven’t read them
Nowhere am I saying they're lying. I'm saying you can report them differently and come up with very different outcomes. All would be transparent and above board but the reported values would be massively different.
Had a quick look through last set of accounts on Companies House (2019). Main points were loss of turnover from relegation from league distributions, largely offset by player sales and cash reserves. This will of course for the following season increase again as they got promoted. The likely realisable values of the players will have increased as well as they'll be playing in a higher division which although not reflected in the statements adds a bit more reassurance.
I noticed a share issue in the previous year as well adding £6m to the coffers (i.e. owners adding funds), which helped cover the losses.
I noticed all of the fixed assets are depreciated by S/L, which is quite rare - most are done by percentage of NBV to reflect the higher loss in value early on. Nothing wrong with doing it as they have but tends to result in a raised asset value on the balance sheet in the first few years after purchase. (Not including player value amortisation which is tended to be S/L over contract length and makes sense).
Also noticed the number of footballing staff fell by 15, probably either in the youth football or coaching side predominantly and wages dropped a fair bit as would be expected due to relegation. These will have likely increased again following promotion.
Transfer fee debtors increased significantly, again expected due to likely sales from relegation.
So from that it looks like Barnsley are doing a similar system to us, looking to invest in young players to sell on in order to survive. This is risky but in context of the industry it's in it's no riskier than anyone else. It's reliant on at least some of those young players progressing to be sold on and not suffering relegation (or at least relegation for a prolonged period) reducing those player values significantly. They suffered quite a drastic drop in cash reserves (which is far more worrying for the immediate future of a business than profitability or even balance sheet value) and if they hadn't got promoted it would've put significant strain on them had they relied on it for a second year, esp as cash was boosted by £6m via a share issue the previous year so without that their cash reserves would've been totally wiped out.
Difference between them and us though is that they had a share issue to sort out their liquidity, ours is always done via loans from the owners and so will accrue interest.
So in an ordinary industry it'd be a risky position but in football it's about as secure as possible in the lower leagues (i.e. not particularly) but just a couple of seasons of poor performance or recruitment can stuff you right up. The Covid effect on everyone will be interesting to see. But I don't see anything there to suggest Barnsley are in any more shit than any other team.