He seems like a popular guy among the squad, which is worth something I guess. As a cheap backup who you hope you never have to play, I’m fine with that.
He’s the best ‘keeper we’ve had in years and is light years ahead of Wilson.After a good start Moore form wise has dropped off,felt he was at fault for Boros goal on Saturday.
Ok. How was he at fault though?After a good start Moore form wise has dropped off,felt he was at fault for Boros goal on Saturday.
Ok. How was he at fault though?
No way you can blame Moore. You have to look at JCS and Bidwell first.After a good start Moore form wise has dropped off,felt he was at fault for Boros goal on Saturday.
If that had been Wilson you all would be saying it was his fault.No way you can blame Moore. You have to look at JCS and Bidwell first.
Yes he was a bit slow to get out to it, whether he expected it to be cut out by JCS I don't knowRobins said the same, should be dropping on that ball in and not getting beaten by the striker.
Yes he was a bit slow to get out to it, whether he expected it to be cut out by JCS I don't know
As mentioned on another thread, I haven't been particularly blown over by Bidwell (although very, very early days) but I must say, I find it really harsh that he is getting some of the blame apportioned here. First;y, it was JCS' man:No way you can blame Moore. You have to look at JCS and Bidwell first.
Yeah from this it is very harsh to blame Bidwell. There's a few mistakes in there that lead to the goal but I still don't think you can blame Moore.As mentioned on another thread, I haven't been particularly blown over by Bidwell (although very, very early days) but I must say, I find it really harsh that he is getting some of the blame apportioned here. First;y, it was JCS' man:
View attachment 23716
Bidwell has to cover Crooks (25) and Jones (35 bottom of the screen) with no support whatsoever. By the time JCS commits to the ball, around the below screenshot:
View attachment 23714
Bidwell is left in an almost impossible situation. He has to gamble as he is covering three players. He has anticipated (rightly in my opinion) that JCS should be able to block or intercept the cross to 11 (Sporar), the eventual goal scorer. If he had got sucked in, Balogun could well have pulled back to Crooks or Jones who are completely unmarked and people would be saying 'Bidwell got sucked in!'.
View attachment 23715
He had to gamble because there was zero defensive support (arguably from Shipley with Crooks) so to blame him is very harsh.
Some might have. A few put down Miwall's goal to a Wilson mistake but I think that was harsh. He's a good number 2.If that had been Wilson you all would be saying it was his fault.
Well broken down. I would also say that maybe McFadz should be looked at too. He ran at their left sided player as if he was going to clatter him, fully committed himself, then defended how we were doing it last season and left it open for the player to play it past him and cut inside. He made it a bit too easy for their man.As mentioned on another thread, I haven't been particularly blown over by Bidwell (although very, very early days) but I must say, I find it really harsh that he is getting some of the blame apportioned here. First;y, it was JCS' man:
View attachment 23716
Bidwell has to cover Crooks (25) and Jones (35 bottom of the screen) with no support whatsoever. By the time JCS commits to the ball, around the below screenshot:
View attachment 23714
Bidwell is left in an almost impossible situation. He has to gamble as he is covering three players. He has anticipated (rightly in my opinion) that JCS should be able to block or intercept the cross to 11 (Sporar), the eventual goal scorer. If he had got sucked in, Balogun could well have pulled back to Crooks or Jones who are completely unmarked and people would be saying 'Bidwell got sucked in!'.
View attachment 23715
He had to gamble because there was zero defensive support (arguably from Shipley with Crooks) so to blame him is very harsh.
Yup, fair analysis. You can just tell Shipley thinking 'oh shit' in the second screenshotAs mentioned on another thread, I haven't been particularly blown over by Bidwell (although very, very early days) but I must say, I find it really harsh that he is getting some of the blame apportioned here. First;y, it was JCS' man:
View attachment 23716
Bidwell has to cover Crooks (25) and Jones (35 bottom of the screen) with no support whatsoever. By the time JCS commits to the ball, around the below screenshot:
View attachment 23714
Bidwell is left in an almost impossible situation. He has to gamble as he is covering three players. He has anticipated (rightly in my opinion) that JCS should be able to block or intercept the cross to 11 (Sporar), the eventual goal scorer. If he had got sucked in, Balogun could well have pulled back to Crooks or Jones who are completely unmarked and people would be saying 'Bidwell got sucked in!'.
View attachment 23715
He had to gamble because there was zero defensive support (arguably from Shipley with Crooks) so to blame him is very harsh.
Not solely, it was a difficult ball to deal with but think you can say he should have been a bit braver coming for the ball. Then he would have probably got the foul he was asking for.Yeah from this it is very harsh to blame Bidwell. There's a few mistakes in there that lead to the goal but I still don't think you can blame Moore.
As mentioned on another thread, I haven't been particularly blown over by Bidwell (although very, very early days) but I must say, I find it really harsh that he is getting some of the blame apportioned here. First;y, it was JCS' man:
View attachment 23716
Bidwell has to cover Crooks (25) and Jones (35 bottom of the screen) with no support whatsoever. By the time JCS commits to the ball, around the below screenshot:
View attachment 23714
Bidwell is left in an almost impossible situation. He has to gamble as he is covering three players. He has anticipated (rightly in my opinion) that JCS should be able to block or intercept the cross to 11 (Sporar), the eventual goal scorer. If he had got sucked in, Balogun could well have pulled back to Crooks or Jones who are completely unmarked and people would be saying 'Bidwell got sucked in!'.
View attachment 23715
He had to gamble because there was zero defensive support (arguably from Shipley with Crooks) so to blame him is very harsh.
100%, i posted similar on the Bidwell thread.As mentioned on another thread, I haven't been particularly blown over by Bidwell (although very, very early days) but I must say, I find it really harsh that he is getting some of the blame apportioned here. First;y, it was JCS' man:
View attachment 23716
Bidwell has to cover Crooks (25) and Jones (35 bottom of the screen) with no support whatsoever. By the time JCS commits to the ball, around the below screenshot:
View attachment 23714
Bidwell is left in an almost impossible situation. He has to gamble as he is covering three players. He has anticipated (rightly in my opinion) that JCS should be able to block or intercept the cross to 11 (Sporar), the eventual goal scorer. If he had got sucked in, Balogun could well have pulled back to Crooks or Jones who are completely unmarked and people would be saying 'Bidwell got sucked in!'.
View attachment 23715
He had to gamble because there was zero defensive support (arguably from Shipley with Crooks) so to blame him is very harsh.
Based on what?Wilson should play Southampton
Wilson should play Southampton
Based on what?
It‘s a cup game,league’s more important - rotate the squad - come on,use your head
It's common for teams with superior squads to ours. Why on earth would you insult 5k away fans by playing your second choice team for a cup game?Not uncommon for back up goalies to play in the cups is it? Also he’s not done anything wrong when called upon this season either wouldn’t have a problem with him starting tbh!
CluelessIt‘s a cup game,league’s more important - rotate the squad - come on,use your head
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?