No point in a swap as Burnley have no strikers - cannot see them letting Austin, Rodriquez or Patterson go. Teams in this division need 4 strikers (well all teams except us apparently)
Maybe this is why the CT has an article saying we are looking for a striker today.
Stuart linnell says that his "sources" say we are after McDonald from norwich and Kevin motion from fortar
Yes but everyone has their price..Not just a game but a business, no mater how poorly it's run.Wouldn't surprise me if it was the board trying to be heros again and making it all up.
"Lets pretend we turned a bid down, the fans will love us and all by season tickets. Just like when we said Marlon was signing"
Stuart linnell says that his "sources" say we are after Kevin motion from fortar
And I think the transfer embargo was because of money owed to Stockport for Baker?
I'm pretty sure it was money owed to Bolton for the Danny Ward loan where the more he played the less we paid them. Little shit got a groin injury and refused to come back. Think the club have confirmed this somewhere...
If we sold Juke and signed A.L.F then we're back to square one really, we'd still be short of options up front.
I think your missing the point, they would be selling him to make money, not to reinvest. They would HAVE to buy one striker, maybe spend 500 000 or a million, but that's all we would get, the rest would go in to SISU's coffers
You genuinely believe if we sold Juke for £1.5 million SISU would allow Thorn to spend £1.5 million on transfers?! Why would they even sell Juke in the first place if they weren't after the money for themselves?!